Just do it
Just do it
If it is using a highly potent greenhouse gas as the ‘air’ in your ‘air’ shoes, then selling lots of carbon credits on the basis that you stopped doing that, that is.
Move-a… side, and let the mango through… let the mango through
Re: Just do it
Alternative link (to what seems like the identical text) without the apparent need to sign up to Bloombergnekomatic wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 2:35 pmIf it is using a highly potent greenhouse gas as the ‘air’ in your ‘air’ shoes, then selling lots of carbon credits on the basis that you stopped doing that, that is.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
Re: Just do it
Ta, I’m not signed up to Bloomberg but it may have been a gift link that ran out.Gfamily wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 2:52 pmAlternative link (to what seems like the identical text) without the apparent need to sign up to Bloomberg
Move-a… side, and let the mango through… let the mango through
Re: Just do it
I seem to remember when I visited Daresbury some years back they showed us a tower a few metres across and about three storeys high that had originally been filled with SF6 for Science Reasons. I wonder where all of that went when they decommissioned it, and how many Air Jordans worth it represented.
Move-a… side, and let the mango through… let the mango through
Re: Just do it
Interestingnekomatic wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 5:33 pmI seem to remember when I visited Daresbury some years back they showed us a tower a few metres across and about three storeys high that had originally been filled with SF6 for Science Reasons. I wonder where all of that went when they decommissioned it, and how many Air Jordans worth it represented.
Article from 1977 on the design of the Nuclear Structure Facility instrument https://cds.cern.ch/record/1729633/file ... p150-e.pdf
Decommissioned in 1993, the 'Accelerator' tower still remains, it's been a while since we've been there at an Open Day, but - as you say - the tower no longer has the original NSF.
I'm not sure whether the awareness of the significance of the greenhouse gas effects of releasing the SF6 to the atmosphere (which is apparently 22,000 times that of CO2) would have been considered at the time.
I found this interesting article on decomposing SF6 by passing it through electroplating sludge. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23705981/
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
Re: Just do it
The line which caught my eye was "...and a limited amount of HF". Sounds like more than a smidgeon, but less than a fair old bit. Anyway, good luck with that, I'll be waaaaay over there.Gfamily wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 6:25 pm... I found this interesting article on decomposing SF6 by passing it through electroplating sludge. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23705981/
Re: Just do it
You just need quick reaction timesMartin Y wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 11:18 amThe line which caught my eye was "...and a limited amount of HF". Sounds like more than a smidgeon, but less than a fair old bit. Anyway, good luck with that, I'll be waaaaay over there.Gfamily wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 6:25 pm... I found this interesting article on decomposing SF6 by passing it through electroplating sludge. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23705981/
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three