There is every chance that what appears in the news isn’t what actually happened. But police using drones and such is straight from the horse’s mouth.raven wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:09 pmIf the Easter eggs thing is as presented in, for instance, this BBC story, then yes, what the actuall hell.
But I did wonder if perhaps what had happened was some police officer had a quiet word with someone who'd nipped out to the corner shops to buy the kids a treat like normal, and the resulting barney got overheard and interpreted as police telling shopkeepers what they can and can't sell.
Because people will take the piss when they don't like the rules. As I was reminded when I read these two stories today: https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/18344 ... okemon-go/
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-52088987
That last one... He put his wife in the boot. On the M6.
COVID-19 Police state
Re: COVID-19 Police state
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
Re: COVID-19 Police state
From the legal twitterers commenting on this - the police need to be clear about the difference between the law and government guidance, because there are gaps and inconsistencies. In particular, they cannot **enforce** guidance, though they can encourage people to follow the guidance.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Raphael_Hoga ... 1799237632
https://mobile.twitter.com/Raphael_Hoga ... 1799237632
Re: COVID-19 Police state
Oh, and also on the badly worded legislation - it says you may only ***leave your house*** for a reasonable excuse. But what if I leave my house to buy food, and then subsequently decide I fancy heading off to the beach?
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10137
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: COVID-19 Police state
I don't think a reasonable person could be in any genuine confusion about things like that, really.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7082
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: COVID-19 Police state
That does appear to be excessive.raven wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:09 pmIf the Easter eggs thing is as presented in, for instance, this BBC story, then yes, what the actuall hell.
-
- Stargoon
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:44 pm
- Location: Stourbridge
Re: COVID-19 Police state
I see a difference between going out to just buy an Easter egg and going out to buy essential groceries and putting an Easter egg in the trolley. When I went to Waitrose last Friday I put some smoked salmon in the trolley. If the wife asked me to pop out and get her some smoked salmon for her tea she would be told that isn't an essential item.
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7082
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: COVID-19 Police state
Interesting.lpm wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 5:17 pmThe police in Stupidosaurus's lands posted their invented rules on Sat 28th. Your Gove quote was from Sun 29th. The police have also invented rules about visiting elderly parents, going shopping in the wrong places and not being allowed to buy easter eggs.
If the govt issues new guidelines then good - they, unlike the police, are entitled to.
Looking into it it seems that the "exercise once a day for an hour" rule originated in France about a week ago. But the French also added within one kilometer from your house.
There was also confusion and dispute that about exactly what it meant.
Re: COVID-19 Police state
It seems counterproductive to confine everyone to 1km of their houses. In dense urban areas that leads to more contact rather than less, surely.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
Re: COVID-19 Police state
Not just in dense urban areas. Where I live, I'm right on the edge of a small town. In one direction, I can go for a run along all sorts of paths that are mostly pretty quiet, but only once I get more than about 750m from home. In the other, I'm on much busier roads. If I'm restricted to staying within 1km of home, then most of the time I'll be on busy paths or roads which will, of course, be even busier as no-one can spread out into the countryside.
- bob sterman
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm
- Location: Location Location
Re: COVID-19 Police state
It is worth noting that although the legislation does refer to members of a "household" it does not define the place that you must not leave without reasonable excuse as a "house" - it is simply the place "where you are living" ...
"During the emergency period, no person may leave the place where they are living without reasonable excuse. "
And it adds...
"For the purposes of paragraph (1), the place where a person is living includes the premises where they live together with any garden, yard, passage, stair, garage, outhouse or other appurtenance of such premises."
How long someone needs to have spent in a particular place to be deemed to be "living" there does not seem to be defined.
Re: COVID-19 Police state
If your exercise is cycling, then if you can only get 1 km away in an hour you must live near a velodrome!Woodchopper wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 7:43 amInteresting.lpm wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 5:17 pmThe police in Stupidosaurus's lands posted their invented rules on Sat 28th. Your Gove quote was from Sun 29th. The police have also invented rules about visiting elderly parents, going shopping in the wrong places and not being allowed to buy easter eggs.
If the govt issues new guidelines then good - they, unlike the police, are entitled to.
Looking into it it seems that the "exercise once a day for an hour" rule originated in France about a week ago. But the French also added within one kilometer from your house.
There was also confusion and dispute that about exactly what it meant.
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"
- discovolante
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4099
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm
Re: COVID-19 Police state
There will be quite a lot of other case law relating to that in respect of e.g. tenancies etc, although no they don't seem to have taken account of the fact that some people may have chosen to 'live' elsewhere during the lockdown.bob sterman wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 8:50 amIt is worth noting that although the legislation does refer to members of a "household" it does not define the place that you must not leave without reasonable excuse as a "house" - it is simply the place "where you are living" ...
"During the emergency period, no person may leave the place where they are living without reasonable excuse. "
And it adds...
"For the purposes of paragraph (1), the place where a person is living includes the premises where they live together with any garden, yard, passage, stair, garage, outhouse or other appurtenance of such premises."
How long someone needs to have spent in a particular place to be deemed to be "living" there does not seem to be defined.
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7082
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: COVID-19 Police state
As Bird on a Fire mentioned up thread the intention is to stop people transferring the infection from one area to another. For example, that could happen if someone drives to a local moor and has an interaction with someone from another town.
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7082
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: COVID-19 Police state
Or just cycle round the block lots of times.Martin_B wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 8:53 amIf your exercise is cycling, then if you can only get 1 km away in an hour you must live near a velodrome!Woodchopper wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 7:43 amInteresting.lpm wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 5:17 pmThe police in Stupidosaurus's lands posted their invented rules on Sat 28th. Your Gove quote was from Sun 29th. The police have also invented rules about visiting elderly parents, going shopping in the wrong places and not being allowed to buy easter eggs.
If the govt issues new guidelines then good - they, unlike the police, are entitled to.
Looking into it it seems that the "exercise once a day for an hour" rule originated in France about a week ago. But the French also added within one kilometer from your house.
There was also confusion and dispute that about exactly what it meant.
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 2396
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: COVID-19 Police state
It looks like the Easter egg thing is b.llsh.t
https://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/news/w ... er-4002482
https://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/news/w ... er-4002482
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
Re: COVID-19 Police state
It's a good sign the police are now taking the piss out of the moron police.Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 11:50 amIt looks like the Easter egg thing is b.llsh.t
https://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/news/w ... er-4002482
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
- Pucksoppet
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:13 pm
- Location: Girdling the Earth
Re: COVID-19 Police state
David Allen Green blogs on precisely this point:
The Law and Policy Blog (David Allen Green): What the police are getting wrong about the coronavirus regulations 31st March 2020
Re: COVID-19 Police state
Agreed. But you can't enforce this, because it wouldn't be breaking the law.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:14 pmI don't think a reasonable person could be in any genuine confusion about things like that, really.
Re: COVID-19 Police state
Courts decide on “reasonable” things all the time don’t they?AMS wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 1:47 pmAgreed. But you can't enforce this, because it wouldn't be breaking the law.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:14 pmI don't think a reasonable person could be in any genuine confusion about things like that, really.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
- discovolante
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4099
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm
Re: COVID-19 Police state
Pucksoppet wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 1:22 pmDavid Allen Green blogs on precisely this point:
The Law and Policy Blog (David Allen Green): What the police are getting wrong about the coronavirus regulations 31st March 2020
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7082
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: COVID-19 Police state
Or there's this option: https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments ... apartment/Woodchopper wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 9:13 amOr just cycle round the block lots of times.Martin_B wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 8:53 amIf your exercise is cycling, then if you can only get 1 km away in an hour you must live near a velodrome!Woodchopper wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 7:43 am
Interesting.
Looking into it it seems that the "exercise once a day for an hour" rule originated in France about a week ago. But the French also added within one kilometer from your house.
There was also confusion and dispute that about exactly what it meant.
Re: COVID-19 Police state
Is it the use of drones or that they decided to make an example of 2 people who were apparently isolated and not putting themselves at risk?
I agree that the latter was a bit of an own goal. The rules are not particularly clear, at least to us lay people. We're supposed to exercise while keeping away from other people & I think most of us can see circumstance that might make finding an empty hilltop a short drive away from home a reasonable compromise. Hence the public sympathy for the dog walkers.
There may be reasons it wasn't reasonable to go for a walk there --- contact with people from other areas, risk of a sprained ankle & resultant added burden on emergency services, it was inside a National Park that had been closed and the signs said that, there was no emergency rescue cover because they'd all volunteered at the local hospital, or whatever. If so, the police would have been better to explain that.
Drone use doesn't bother me any more than the police taking photos of demonstrators does. Which is to say, I want there to be clear guidelines for when they can do it and plenty of oversight.
At least they weren't using facial recognition.
Re: COVID-19 Police state
Oh yeah, not too bothered by the use of drones per se, I think it’s really the officiousness of the police who were using them that pissed me off more than anything.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
Re: COVID-19 Police state
There's always one jobsworth, isn't there.
I remember when Esther Rantzen used to give them prizes....
I remember when Esther Rantzen used to give them prizes....
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 1621
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:02 am
Re: COVID-19 Police state
A polite but firm conversation from someone in authority is harassment and possibly also abuse of powers (e.g. if they used a power to stop someone solely to have such a conversation). A person obeying the law is entitled to go about their business without being stopped by the police, except as necessary in the investigation and prevention of crime. The police should certainly be allowed to stop people when they have a suspicion that the law is being broken - only that they cannot do so solely to prevent people being irresponsible or anti-social in ways which are not illegal.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 1:16 pmThe police have always have a much wider role than enforcing laws. Then can have polite but firm conversations in which they tell someone that they are being irresponsible or anti-social even if that person hasn't broken any laws.