US Election

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Locked
User avatar
EACLucifer
Stummy Beige
Posts: 4177
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
Location: In Sumerian Haze

Re: US Election

Post by EACLucifer » Thu Sep 24, 2020 2:30 pm

dyqik wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:51 am
In the US, thanks to racism, the legacy of Jim Crow, etc., "Liberal" now largely means more centralized Federal government to prevent conservative local governments trampling on rights and equality, while "Conservative" means less centralized government so that local government can oppress who they want.
Absolutely. There's a huge gulf between the most foundational ideological underpinnings and the common beliefs and practise. That said, some people do make the transition from one to the other, and one hopes judges might think a bit more about the underpinnings than randoms on the street.

monkey
After Pie
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: US Election

Post by monkey » Thu Sep 24, 2020 2:34 pm

EACLucifer wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:17 am
In some ways, the more principled ends of liberalism and conservatism (small l and small c), can converge quite remarkably. I was struck recently by a prominent never-Trump self-identified conservative describing as a conservative virtue the idea that government should make law only when necessary and otherwise leave prople to live their lives uninterfered with, as that's a position I would personally describe as liberal.
Sounds like you're describing a Libertarian, who sometimes describe themselves as "classical liberals", and complain that the meaning of the word liberal has changed since the 1800s. There's a few of them on the republican side of things. They come in several flavours, but they are all united by having a limited idea of what freedom is. Often what laws they disagree with or what actions they think a government should be allowed to take seems to be guided by their prejudices, their personal gain, or the gain of their cronies.

User avatar
JQH
After Pie
Posts: 2141
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:30 pm
Location: Sar Flandan

Re: US Election

Post by JQH » Thu Sep 24, 2020 3:10 pm

monkey wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 2:34 pm
EACLucifer wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:17 am
In some ways, the more principled ends of liberalism and conservatism (small l and small c), can converge quite remarkably. I was struck recently by a prominent never-Trump self-identified conservative describing as a conservative virtue the idea that government should make law only when necessary and otherwise leave prople to live their lives uninterfered with, as that's a position I would personally describe as liberal.
Sounds like you're describing a Libertarian ...
Well that view is necessary to be a Libertarian but is it sufficient? Liberals and libertarians might agree on the lack of necessity to make laws regulating the gender or race of people consenting adults can have sex with but they would disagree on legislating on workplace rights.
And remember that if you botch the exit, the carnival of reaction may be coming to a town near you.

Fintan O'Toole

monkey
After Pie
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: US Election

Post by monkey » Thu Sep 24, 2020 4:04 pm

JQH wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 3:10 pm
monkey wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 2:34 pm
EACLucifer wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:17 am
In some ways, the more principled ends of liberalism and conservatism (small l and small c), can converge quite remarkably. I was struck recently by a prominent never-Trump self-identified conservative describing as a conservative virtue the idea that government should make law only when necessary and otherwise leave prople to live their lives uninterfered with, as that's a position I would personally describe as liberal.
Sounds like you're describing a Libertarian ...
Well that view is necessary to be a Libertarian but is it sufficient? Liberals and libertarians might agree on the lack of necessity to make laws regulating the gender or race of people consenting adults can have sex with but they would disagree on legislating on workplace rights.
No, it's not sufficient. I used sounds like for a reason. I was just suggesting that EAClucifer may have encountered a Libertarian who often seem to consider themselves to be the "true liberals", based on a historic definition, not the contemporary, which seemed to be related to his/her thoughts.

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Princess POW
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: US Election

Post by Bird on a Fire » Thu Sep 24, 2020 5:01 pm

JQH wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 3:10 pm
monkey wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 2:34 pm
EACLucifer wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:17 am
In some ways, the more principled ends of liberalism and conservatism (small l and small c), can converge quite remarkably. I was struck recently by a prominent never-Trump self-identified conservative describing as a conservative virtue the idea that government should make law only when necessary and otherwise leave prople to live their lives uninterfered with, as that's a position I would personally describe as liberal.
Sounds like you're describing a Libertarian ...
Well that view is necessary to be a Libertarian but is it sufficient? Liberals and libertarians might agree on the lack of necessity to make laws regulating the gender or race of people consenting adults can have sex with but they would disagree on legislating on workplace rights.
A lot of libertarians online also seem to agree on the lack of necessity to make laws regulating the age of people consenting adults can have sex with, which makes me suspect they haven't quite grasped the way that power dynamics interact with liberties.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.

User avatar
EACLucifer
Stummy Beige
Posts: 4177
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
Location: In Sumerian Haze

Re: US Election

Post by EACLucifer » Thu Sep 24, 2020 5:23 pm

monkey wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 2:34 pm
EACLucifer wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:17 am
In some ways, the more principled ends of liberalism and conservatism (small l and small c), can converge quite remarkably. I was struck recently by a prominent never-Trump self-identified conservative describing as a conservative virtue the idea that government should make law only when necessary and otherwise leave prople to live their lives uninterfered with, as that's a position I would personally describe as liberal.
Sounds like you're describing a Libertarian
No, I'm describing a social liberal. The key part of that is the "when necessary", which opinions differ on, and I am talking about foundational principles, not ideological details. The point I am making is not that liberals and conservatives are alike, and a lot of people are not principled at all, but tribal or selfish*, but that principled small c conservatism can lead to alignment with small l liberalism. This is specifically in the context of a judge appointed as an apparent conservative ultimately supporting liberal positions.



*Or rather everyone's a blend of all of these in different proportions.

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8241
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: US Election

Post by shpalman » Thu Sep 24, 2020 5:32 pm

Vote him out!
Donald Trump was loudly booed by crowds as he visited the supreme court to pay his respects to Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

As the president and the first lady paused at Ginsburg’s casket, the crowd yelled: 'Vote him out!'
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

monkey
After Pie
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: US Election

Post by monkey » Thu Sep 24, 2020 8:13 pm

EACLucifer wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 5:23 pm
monkey wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 2:34 pm
EACLucifer wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:17 am
In some ways, the more principled ends of liberalism and conservatism (small l and small c), can converge quite remarkably. I was struck recently by a prominent never-Trump self-identified conservative describing as a conservative virtue the idea that government should make law only when necessary and otherwise leave prople to live their lives uninterfered with, as that's a position I would personally describe as liberal.
Sounds like you're describing a Libertarian
No, I'm describing a social liberal. The key part of that is the "when necessary", which opinions differ on, and I am talking about foundational principles, not ideological details. The point I am making is not that liberals and conservatives are alike, and a lot of people are not principled at all, but tribal or selfish*, but that principled small c conservatism can lead to alignment with small l liberalism. This is specifically in the context of a judge appointed as an apparent conservative ultimately supporting liberal positions.



*Or rather everyone's a blend of all of these in different proportions.
I did think what you wrote sounded like a libertarian, whether you meant it to or not. Libertarians are socially liberal and they seem very keen on principles rather than ideology, even if they often get bent when it suits and ideological libertarians exist. Anyway, as I said to JQH, I just thought that a group that often aligns themselves with conservatives that also sometimes call themselves liberals was pertinent to what you wrote. It was an example of where the overlap I thought you were talking about.

I nearly wrote a sentence or two on the "when necessary" bit about it covering everyone from a pure Anarchist to Big Brother, but that seemed overly pedantic :)
Bird on a Fire wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 5:01 pm
A lot of libertarians online also seem to agree on the lack of necessity to make laws regulating the age of people consenting adults can have sex with, which makes me suspect they haven't quite grasped the way that power dynamics interact with liberties.
This sort of thing is why I said they have a limited view of freedom. The only power they think is relevant to freedom is the power of the state.

User avatar
EACLucifer
Stummy Beige
Posts: 4177
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
Location: In Sumerian Haze

Re: US Election

Post by EACLucifer » Fri Sep 25, 2020 6:16 am

monkey wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 8:13 pm
EACLucifer wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 5:23 pm
monkey wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 2:34 pm


Sounds like you're describing a Libertarian
No, I'm describing a social liberal. The key part of that is the "when necessary", which opinions differ on, and I am talking about foundational principles, not ideological details. The point I am making is not that liberals and conservatives are alike, and a lot of people are not principled at all, but tribal or selfish*, but that principled small c conservatism can lead to alignment with small l liberalism. This is specifically in the context of a judge appointed as an apparent conservative ultimately supporting liberal positions.



*Or rather everyone's a blend of all of these in different proportions.
I did think what you wrote sounded like a libertarian, whether you meant it to or not. Libertarians are socially liberal and they seem very keen on principles rather than ideology, even if they often get bent when it suits and ideological libertarians exist. Anyway, as I said to JQH, I just thought that a group that often aligns themselves with conservatives that also sometimes call themselves liberals was pertinent to what you wrote. It was an example of where the overlap I thought you were talking about.

I nearly wrote a sentence or two on the "when necessary" bit about it covering everyone from a pure Anarchist to Big Brother, but that seemed overly pedantic :)
It's not overly pedantic at all, it's the crux of the matter of how people can move between political positions. If both positions agree on everything but a single position re: when is necessary, then there's not so much that has to change.
Bird on a Fire wrote:
Thu Sep 24, 2020 5:01 pm
A lot of libertarians online also seem to agree on the lack of necessity to make laws regulating the age of people consenting adults can have sex with, which makes me suspect they haven't quite grasped the way that power dynamics interact with liberties.
I've seen that sort of kneejerk, brainless libertarianism described as "critical government studies" before - they can problematise all government and identify the similarities between, say, the US National Park Service and Iran's Revolutionary Guards, but fail to grasp why the differences are rather more important.

This sort of thing is why I said they have a limited view of freedom. The only power they think is relevant to freedom is the power of the state.

User avatar
El Pollo Diablo
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
Location: FBPE

Re: US Election

Post by El Pollo Diablo » Mon Sep 28, 2020 8:29 am

538 has biden now set to win Ohio. Interesting.
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: US Election

Post by lpm » Mon Sep 28, 2020 12:32 pm

There was an outlier Fox poll for Ohio, will probably move back.

What matters more is the clock running down. The 538 model partly gave Trump a high % chance because there was a long way to go. Every week the odds move in Biden's favour, even though polls are refusing to shift. 5 weeks left isn't much to produce a turnaround.

But Debate 1 tomorrow. Could cause a sudden shift, if Biden tries to kiss a moderator or Trump shits his pants. I'm hoping Trump will choke on his own vomit, or someone else's vomit, and dies thrashing around on stage.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
Little waster
After Pie
Posts: 2385
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes

Re: US Election

Post by Little waster » Mon Sep 28, 2020 12:43 pm

lpm wrote:
Mon Sep 28, 2020 12:32 pm
There was an outlier Fox poll for Ohio, will probably move back.

What matters more is the clock running down. The 538 model partly gave Trump a high % chance because there was a long way to go. Every week the odds move in Biden's favour, even though polls are refusing to shift. 5 weeks left isn't much to produce a turnaround.

But Debate 1 tomorrow. Could cause a sudden shift, if Biden tries to kiss a moderator or Trump shits his pants. I'm hoping Trump will choke on his own vomit, or someone else's vomit, and dies thrashing around on stage.
And 40% of the US electorate would still vote for his rotten, bloated corpse on the basis that slowly putrescing while stinking vile fumes leak out of his decayed orifices is exactly the dignified presidential behaviour they want the world to see the US represented by and the sort of world class leadership the US needs right now.

The "Christian" Conservatives I imagine will be loudly predicting his resurrection on the third day and will attribute his failure to, to the biased fake news of the godless MSM.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5276
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: US Election

Post by jimbob » Mon Sep 28, 2020 1:41 pm

Little waster wrote:
Mon Sep 28, 2020 12:43 pm
lpm wrote:
Mon Sep 28, 2020 12:32 pm
There was an outlier Fox poll for Ohio, will probably move back.

What matters more is the clock running down. The 538 model partly gave Trump a high % chance because there was a long way to go. Every week the odds move in Biden's favour, even though polls are refusing to shift. 5 weeks left isn't much to produce a turnaround.

But Debate 1 tomorrow. Could cause a sudden shift, if Biden tries to kiss a moderator or Trump shits his pants. I'm hoping Trump will choke on his own vomit, or someone else's vomit, and dies thrashing around on stage.
And 40% of the US electorate would still vote for his rotten, bloated corpse on the basis that slowly putrescing while stinking vile fumes leak out of his decayed orifices is exactly the dignified presidential behaviour they want the world to see the US represented by and the sort of world class leadership the US needs right now.

The "Christian" Conservatives I imagine will be loudly predicting his resurrection on the third day and will attribute his failure to, to the biased fake news of the godless MSM.
Is it just abortion and racism? Or have I missed any other reason why Trump's support is still so surprisingly high?
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
bolo
Dorkwood
Posts: 1016
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:17 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: US Election

Post by bolo » Mon Sep 28, 2020 1:55 pm

It's not just abortion and racism. It's political polarization generally. There are a lot of Republicans who would vote for a shoebox if it was painted red and had an R on the lid. Similarly there are plenty of Democrats who would vote for a blue shoebox with a D on it. And the polarization is on all sorts of issues in addition to abortion and race -- taxes, the environment, the size of the military, globalization, everything.

FlammableFlower
Dorkwood
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm

Re: US Election

Post by FlammableFlower » Mon Sep 28, 2020 1:57 pm

Dems/libruls = communists?

FlammableFlower
Dorkwood
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm

Re: US Election

Post by FlammableFlower » Mon Sep 28, 2020 1:59 pm

lpm wrote:
Mon Sep 28, 2020 12:32 pm
There was an outlier Fox poll for Ohio, will probably move back.

What matters more is the clock running down. The 538 model partly gave Trump a high % chance because there was a long way to go. Every week the odds move in Biden's favour, even though polls are refusing to shift. 5 weeks left isn't much to produce a turnaround.

But Debate 1 tomorrow. Could cause a sudden shift, if Biden tries to kiss a moderator or Trump shits his pants. I'm hoping Trump will choke on his own vomit, or someone else's vomit, and dies thrashing around on stage.
Trump must be desperately casting about for another "Russia, if you're listening..." moment to have something to sling at Biden.

User avatar
Little waster
After Pie
Posts: 2385
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes

Re: US Election

Post by Little waster » Mon Sep 28, 2020 2:40 pm

jimbob wrote:
Mon Sep 28, 2020 1:41 pm
Little waster wrote:
Mon Sep 28, 2020 12:43 pm
lpm wrote:
Mon Sep 28, 2020 12:32 pm
There was an outlier Fox poll for Ohio, will probably move back.

What matters more is the clock running down. The 538 model partly gave Trump a high % chance because there was a long way to go. Every week the odds move in Biden's favour, even though polls are refusing to shift. 5 weeks left isn't much to produce a turnaround.

But Debate 1 tomorrow. Could cause a sudden shift, if Biden tries to kiss a moderator or Trump shits his pants. I'm hoping Trump will choke on his own vomit, or someone else's vomit, and dies thrashing around on stage.
And 40% of the US electorate would still vote for his rotten, bloated corpse on the basis that slowly putrescing while stinking vile fumes leak out of his decayed orifices is exactly the dignified presidential behaviour they want the world to see the US represented by and the sort of world class leadership the US needs right now.

The "Christian" Conservatives I imagine will be loudly predicting his resurrection on the third day and will attribute his failure to, to the biased fake news of the godless MSM.
Is it just abortion and racism? Or have I missed any other reason why Trump's support is still so surprisingly high?
Chuck in a massive unpaid-for tax cut and 2 (soon to be three Supreme Court judges) appointments.

He is also very good at telling his base exactly what they want to hear; that all the problems in their lives are in fact down to sneering godless liberal elites, uppity blacks, dirty Mexicans and the insidious Chinese and that he is the only politician willing to say that out loud because lets face the core Republican vote are a bunch of horrible stupid c.nts*.

There is also one of the few things in his plus column* (and ironically one of the few things the AEI ghouls disagree with him on), in that he has mostly managed to keep the US out of any further overseas military entanglements.


*cue a million chin-stroking articles from self-appointed moderates who believe we shouldn't call them out on that but should instead try to find ways to pander to them.

**YMMV
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.

User avatar
El Pollo Diablo
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
Location: FBPE

Re: US Election

Post by El Pollo Diablo » Tue Sep 29, 2020 10:23 am

Biden nine points ahead in Pennsylvania, according to both WaPo and NYT polls. Excellent news.
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: US Election

Post by lpm » Tue Sep 29, 2020 10:48 am

Pennsylvania is the only state you need to poll. Not only is it the key marginal that's pretty likely to be the state that tips the EC from Trump to Biden, it's also the most correlated state.

It's highly correlated with Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota. Plus Ohio, Iowa and Missouri. And New Hampshire for some reason. It even correlates quite well with Florida. The only marginals it doesn't really correlate with are Georgia and Arizona.

There was a chart somewhere on 538 that shows the correlations, but I can't find it now.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: US Election

Post by lpm » Tue Sep 29, 2020 11:28 am

Couldn't find it on 538 because it was The Economist

https://projects.economist.com/us-2020- ... /president
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 7524
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: US Election

Post by dyqik » Tue Sep 29, 2020 1:19 pm

lpm wrote:
Tue Sep 29, 2020 10:48 am
Pennsylvania is the only state you need to poll. Not only is it the key marginal that's pretty likely to be the state that tips the EC from Trump to Biden, it's also the most correlated state.

It's highly correlated with Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota. Plus Ohio, Iowa and Missouri. And New Hampshire for some reason. It even correlates quite well with Florida. The only marginals it doesn't really correlate with are Georgia and Arizona.

There was a chart somewhere on 538 that shows the correlations, but I can't find it now.
If you assume that Wisconsin is safe enough, and correlated with PA, then you should be polling at least AZ, GA, NC and FL as well as PA. Any one of those states gets Biden to 270, and they aren't well correlated enough that lack of movement in PA means lack of movement elsewhere. Biden also has somewhat of a home town advantage in Scranton, PA, so you shouldn't assume the correlation holds for him as well as it does generally.

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 7524
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: US Election

Post by dyqik » Tue Sep 29, 2020 4:14 pm

Oh, and Alaska is probably worth polling too.

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: US Election

Post by lpm » Tue Sep 29, 2020 4:43 pm

Of course it isn't. Polling resources are limited, so deploy resources on a state that also reveals other states.

If you were only allowed one poll, you'd poll Pennsylvania. If allowed a second, then Florida. From those two you can pretty much get all the marginals.
That's how correlation works. If you poll Georgia as well then that only gives extra indications for Louisiana or Alabama that you don't care about. North Carolina gives indications for Tennessee and Kentucky.

The only benefit to polling Alaska or Iowa is for the Senate races.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 7524
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: US Election

Post by dyqik » Tue Sep 29, 2020 5:34 pm

lpm wrote:
Tue Sep 29, 2020 4:43 pm
Of course it isn't. Polling resources are limited, so deploy resources on a state that also reveals other states.

If you were only allowed one poll, you'd poll Pennsylvania. If allowed a second, then Florida. From those two you can pretty much get all the marginals.
That's how correlation works. If you poll Georgia as well then that only gives extra indications for Louisiana or Alabama that you don't care about. North Carolina gives indications for Tennessee and Kentucky.

The only benefit to polling Alaska or Iowa is for the Senate races.
You're allowed far more than one poll though. Dozens at least.

And control of the Senate is as important as the White House, and far more in question.

User avatar
El Pollo Diablo
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
Location: FBPE

Re: US Election

Post by El Pollo Diablo » Tue Sep 29, 2020 6:33 pm

Has something happened in Georgia? Because all of a sudden Raphael Warnock is polling ahead of the two republican candidates in the special senate election.
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued

Locked