What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Post Reply
User avatar
JQH
After Pie
Posts: 2142
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:30 pm
Location: Sar Flandan

What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by JQH » Tue Sep 01, 2020 11:37 pm

Not a lot really, they're both defending a social order based on white supremacy.
And remember that if you botch the exit, the carnival of reaction may be coming to a town near you.

Fintan O'Toole

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Princess POW
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by Bird on a Fire » Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:27 am

That's an excellent essay. Thanks for sharing.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.

User avatar
Boustrophedon
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2860
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
Location: Lincolnshire Wolds

Re: What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by Boustrophedon » Wed Sep 02, 2020 1:24 am

The right wing have been pushing the theory that one of his victims, Joseph Rosenbaum, was a convicted peadophile sex offender, so that's alright that he got shot. I tried to investigate online but got lost in a deep dark rabbit hole of misinformation and untrustworthy sites and had to block a lot of people on facebook.
Hjulet snurrar men hamstern är död.

User avatar
Little waster
After Pie
Posts: 2385
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes

Re: What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by Little waster » Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:35 am

Boustrophedon wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 1:24 am
The right wing have been pushing the theory that one of his victims, Joseph Rosenbaum, was a convicted peadophile sex offender, so that's alright that he got shot. I tried to investigate online but got lost in a deep dark rabbit hole of misinformation and untrustworthy sites and had to block a lot of people on facebook.
Which has as much logic as claiming one of the children allegedly abused by Rosenbaum would have grown up to be Future Space-Hitler so that’s OK too.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.

User avatar
Little waster
After Pie
Posts: 2385
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes

Re: What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by Little waster » Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:59 am

Unsurprisingly the DM has taken the line “Rosenbaum shouted at Rittenhouse before he was shot so really he probably deserved it”, it’s ironic that the biggest snowflakes always appear to be from the Right. However not even a whisper of any past wrongdoing from any of the usual suspects who you’d expect to be all over that so it appears to be certainly as false as it is irrelevant.

I did find the following disclaimer from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel https://eu.jsonline.com/story/news/2020 ... 679537002/ suggesting they are aware of the allegations but have refused to report them on the basis they aren’t relevant and, despite their superior investigative resources, have been unable to verify them.

Meanwhile, supposed 2nd Amendment supporters are twisting themselves through all sorts of logic-pretzels to explain away how the third, wounded victim Grosskreutz was actually still in the wrong when he tried to tackle Rittenhouse with a handgun in the immediate aftermath.

So much for the sub-Die Hard cant about “a good man with a gun”. It also goes to show that in the majority of mass shooting cases any “good man with a gun” present would simply be added to the death-count when faced with a better-armed and better-prepared “bad man with a gun” and just exponentially add to the chaos.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.

User avatar
JQH
After Pie
Posts: 2142
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:30 pm
Location: Sar Flandan

Re: What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by JQH » Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:39 am

Bird on a Fire wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:27 am
That's an excellent essay. Thanks for sharing.
On reading it suddenly a lot of things make "sense".

Still haven't a clue what to do about them mind. It makes clear that the spittle flecked rants of the likes of Mike Adams, claiming BLM and Antifa are terrorists, are actually mainstream views in the US. I'm seriously thinking that they are sleep walking into another civil war.
And remember that if you botch the exit, the carnival of reaction may be coming to a town near you.

Fintan O'Toole

FlammableFlower
Dorkwood
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm

Re: What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by FlammableFlower » Wed Sep 02, 2020 11:18 am

JQH wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:39 am
Bird on a Fire wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:27 am
That's an excellent essay. Thanks for sharing.
On reading it suddenly a lot of things make "sense".

Still haven't a clue what to do about them mind. It makes clear that the spittle flecked rants of the likes of Mike Adams, claiming BLM and Antifa are terrorists, are actually mainstream views in the US. I'm seriously thinking that they are sleep walking into another civil war.
I know it's easy to over-read things, especially as magnified by the media, but I am starting to feel a little worried about this too. There's definite entrenchment of positions occurring. I know here there's the Tory/Labour divide, but guns aren't in that mix.

User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 5180
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by Gfamily » Wed Sep 02, 2020 11:31 am

FlammableFlower wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 11:18 am
JQH wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:39 am
Bird on a Fire wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:27 am
That's an excellent essay. Thanks for sharing.
On reading it suddenly a lot of things make "sense".

Still haven't a clue what to do about them mind. It makes clear that the spittle flecked rants of the likes of Mike Adams, claiming BLM and Antifa are terrorists, are actually mainstream views in the US. I'm seriously thinking that they are sleep walking into another civil war.
I know it's easy to over-read things, especially as magnified by the media, but I am starting to feel a little worried about this too. There's definite entrenchment of positions occurring. I know here there's the Tory/Labour divide, but guns aren't in that mix.
I have a suspicion that there's a significant faction that's marching towards a civil war with its eyes open, but they're seen as 'good people'
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 7527
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by dyqik » Wed Sep 02, 2020 11:40 am

Gfamily wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 11:31 am
I have a suspicion that there's a significant faction that's marching towards a civil war with its eyes open, but they're seen as 'good people'
A loud faction is openly calling for that, and turning up in cities heavily armed to shoot protesters.

They aren't a significant number, but they are loud and amplified by the President's fringe media supporters.

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Princess POW
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by Bird on a Fire » Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:02 pm

In a way it's encouraging. I think the forces of reaction have noticed that there's a huge appetite for change on so many levels, and much of it is happening under its own momentum - women are uniting to take down privileged predators, celebrities are uniting to draw attention to racism, economics now prefers renewable energy to their fossil fuel investments.

They're freaking out because they're losing power and losing control on public sentiment. They know that if people actually united, organised and mobilised en masse they'd be toast. That's why they're loudly and angrily trying to stir up as much division as possible, in particular seeking to divide the working class. And despite the occasional tragedy it doesn't seem to be that successful.

I don't think the US has been on the cusp of such momentous change since the 1960s. Back then, there was a big scary external enemy to frighten people with. Now, the US is the international outlier, and young people who use the internet know this. The only response the beneficiaries of the old order have is to try to conjure up an enemy within. I think they've been a bit too complacent, perhaps even arrogant, and most people aren't buying it.

It does seem like the country (perhaps even the world) might be headed for a "they've got the guns, we've got the numbers" showdown, but obviously I very much hope not.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Princess POW
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by Bird on a Fire » Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:09 pm

JQH wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:39 am
Bird on a Fire wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:27 am
That's an excellent essay. Thanks for sharing.
On reading it suddenly a lot of things make "sense".
It's rare to see an explicit analysis of power these days, but I think it's essential for making sense of the world.

It's not exactly a secret that the US (and much of the world) is controlled by a small class of wealthy capitalists, nor that the process that generates their wealth is and always has been inextricably bound to the exploitation of workers, to racism, to sexism, to incarceration, mass-media propaganda, overseas militarism and so on and so on. But, annoyingly, as soon as you join the dots and point out the big picture and its consequences you get dismissed as a "loony lefty" by people who are clinging to a historically and economically incomplete worldview.

I'd read all the salient points of that essay before, but it's very well written for a mainstream audience, avoiding most of the vocabulary that seems to trigger people.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by Woodchopper » Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:24 pm

JQH wrote:
Tue Sep 01, 2020 11:37 pm
Not a lot really, they're both defending a social order based on white supremacy.
Sorta, but also more complicated. It would be simplistic to portray US police officers as being motivated by white supremacism. To start with, in many departments, white people are a minority.

For example, in the LAPD only 25% of officers of all ranks are white. In the NYPD 47% are white. Its difficult to imagine forces with those demographics being made up of officers who are motivated by white supremacy.

That's not to say that racism isn't a huge problem. Its just complicated.

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Princess POW
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by Bird on a Fire » Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:44 pm

Woodchopper wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:24 pm
JQH wrote:
Tue Sep 01, 2020 11:37 pm
Not a lot really, they're both defending a social order based on white supremacy.
Sorta, but also more complicated. It would be simplistic to portray US police officers as being motivated by white supremacism. To start with, in many departments, white people are a minority.

For example, in the LAPD only 25% of officers of all ranks are white. In the NYPD 47% are white. Its difficult to imagine forces with those demographics being made up of officers who are motivated by white supremacy.

That's not to say that racism isn't a huge problem. Its just complicated.
I think that's why JQH/the article refer to a social order based on white supremacy, rather than white supremacy per se - it's certainly possible for people to accept or defend the current social order without endorsing or noticing its racist underpinnings.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: What’s the Difference Between Kyle Rittenhouse and the Police?

Post by Woodchopper » Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:49 pm

Bird on a Fire wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:44 pm
Woodchopper wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:24 pm
JQH wrote:
Tue Sep 01, 2020 11:37 pm
Not a lot really, they're both defending a social order based on white supremacy.
Sorta, but also more complicated. It would be simplistic to portray US police officers as being motivated by white supremacism. To start with, in many departments, white people are a minority.

For example, in the LAPD only 25% of officers of all ranks are white. In the NYPD 47% are white. Its difficult to imagine forces with those demographics being made up of officers who are motivated by white supremacy.

That's not to say that racism isn't a huge problem. Its just complicated.
I think that's why JQH/the article refer to a social order based on white supremacy, rather than white supremacy per se - it's certainly possible for people to accept or defend the current social order without endorsing or noticing its racist underpinnings.
I agree, and there is the whole overlap with class politics as well. I was disagreeing with some of the text of the linked article which mentions white supremicism among police officers. That of course occurs, but it doesn't seem to explain behaviour overall.

Post Reply