Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Post Reply
User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4747
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by Grumble » Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:53 pm

https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/22/2144 ... -elon-musk

I don’t know if this link will update with all the information, I just watched Tesla’s battery presentation and the article linked currently only mentions the first part - tabless batteries. Altogether the improvements they claim will make battery cost fall by 56%, which given people estimate Tesla batteries are currently about $150/kWhr would bring us to about $70. Even if they don’t get all the way there we could break through that $100 barrier which gets touted as a tipping point for affordability of electric cars.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
EACLucifer
Stummy Beige
Posts: 4177
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
Location: In Sumerian Haze

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by EACLucifer » Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:19 pm

Grumble wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:53 pm
https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/22/2144 ... -elon-musk

I don’t know if this link will update with all the information, I just watched Tesla’s battery presentation and the article linked currently only mentions the first part - tabless batteries. Altogether the improvements they claim will make battery cost fall by 56%, which given people estimate Tesla batteries are currently about $150/kWhr would bring us to about $70. Even if they don’t get all the way there we could break through that $100 barrier which gets touted as a tipping point for affordability of electric cars.
On the other hand, it's from a firm run by a lying stock manipulator who once did a presentation where he told everyone the buildings around them were running on solar panels built into the roof tiles, and it was all entirely fake.

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4747
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by Grumble » Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:37 am

Here’s a link with a roundup of the announcements:
https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/22/2145 ... balt-plaid

EACL, anything to say about batteries? These are a pretty big deal IMO.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4747
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by Grumble » Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:23 am

Here’s an explainer of what a tabless electrode is

https://youtu.be/y9S1MCaiB5c
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
bjn
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2916
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:58 pm
Location: London

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by bjn » Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:07 am

EACLucifer wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:19 pm
Grumble wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:53 pm
https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/22/2144 ... -elon-musk

I don’t know if this link will update with all the information, I just watched Tesla’s battery presentation and the article linked currently only mentions the first part - tabless batteries. Altogether the improvements they claim will make battery cost fall by 56%, which given people estimate Tesla batteries are currently about $150/kWhr would bring us to about $70. Even if they don’t get all the way there we could break through that $100 barrier which gets touted as a tipping point for affordability of electric cars.
On the other hand, it's from a firm run by a lying stock manipulator who once did a presentation where he told everyone the buildings around them were running on solar panels built into the roof tiles, and it was all entirely fake.
Nonetheless Tesla generally delivers on their products, but usually to a delayed timetable. The $35,000 Model 3 actually happened as promised. The fully automated self driving car thing is still b.llsh.t though.

Regardless, the change in battery technology seems to be significant, and I'm surprised no-one thought of it earlier.

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4747
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by Grumble » Wed Sep 23, 2020 1:36 pm

One of Tesla’s boasts about the new battery was that it had 5x the capacity. The volume is 5.5x so this isn’t really surprising!
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
bjn
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2916
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:58 pm
Location: London

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by bjn » Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:40 pm

Ars has an article that covers the announced battery tech.

Cost reductions through incremental improvements, but the stated 56% reduction over 3 years is inline with the cost reductions we've seen in the recent past. Other folks are also working on similar incremental improvements and should also see cost declines.

One of the things they are aiming to do is remove the drying step from battery production, which has a high energy cost. So also lowering the environmental foot print of production.

User avatar
bjn
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2916
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:58 pm
Location: London

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by bjn » Fri Sep 25, 2020 9:39 am

Ars Technica has some in depth coverage on Tesla's announcement.

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4747
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by Grumble » Sat Sep 26, 2020 11:27 am

I wonder how independent all the announcements were from each other. The tabless battery architecture is surely quite independent of the chemistry and is a genuine advance. The use of the battery as a structural component of a vehicle is dependent on the battery design though. A larger diameter tube is significantly stiffer and I expect it’s this factor that has enabled the structural use, but it probably can’t be used in existing car designs.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
Martin Y
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by Martin Y » Sat Sep 26, 2020 11:51 am

Grumble wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:23 am
Here’s an explainer of what a tabless electrode is

https://youtu.be/y9S1MCaiB5c
I think I must be missing something because I have the impression capacitors have been made that way for ages. When you have two conductive layers with a separator and roll them up, leaving an offset so each layer sticks out to one side but not the other means you can bond an end cap to each. It seems kinda obvious.i must be missing something.

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4747
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by Grumble » Sat Sep 26, 2020 12:41 pm

Martin Y wrote:
Sat Sep 26, 2020 11:51 am
Grumble wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:23 am
Here’s an explainer of what a tabless electrode is

https://youtu.be/y9S1MCaiB5c
I think I must be missing something because I have the impression capacitors have been made that way for ages. When you have two conductive layers with a separator and roll them up, leaving an offset so each layer sticks out to one side but not the other means you can bond an end cap to each. It seems kinda obvious.i must be missing something.
Certainly obvious in hindsight. I can only think there’s an element of overcoming a long established design.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
Boustrophedon
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2861
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
Location: Lincolnshire Wolds

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by Boustrophedon » Sat Sep 26, 2020 12:48 pm

It all comes down to "Schoopage". Not new in battery construction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYP1sIu ... livedotcom
Hjulet snurrar men hamstern är död.

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 7527
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by dyqik » Sat Sep 26, 2020 2:49 pm

Grumble wrote:
Sat Sep 26, 2020 12:41 pm
Martin Y wrote:
Sat Sep 26, 2020 11:51 am
Grumble wrote:
Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:23 am
Here’s an explainer of what a tabless electrode is

https://youtu.be/y9S1MCaiB5c
I think I must be missing something because I have the impression capacitors have been made that way for ages. When you have two conductive layers with a separator and roll them up, leaving an offset so each layer sticks out to one side but not the other means you can bond an end cap to each. It seems kinda obvious.i must be missing something.
Certainly obvious in hindsight. I can only think there’s an element of overcoming a long established design.
Capacitors don't generally require the current densities that batteries do, and don't contain the chemicals that batteries do, so you may not be able to directly take a capacitor manufacturing technique and use it in a reliable battery.

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4747
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by Grumble » Sat Sep 26, 2020 3:50 pm

Boustrophedon wrote:
Sat Sep 26, 2020 12:48 pm
It all comes down to "Schoopage". Not new in battery construction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYP1sIu ... livedotcom
From that video it seemed like it was new in battery construction but not capacitors, and that one key difference is that capacitors don’t have an electrolyte to worry about.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
Boustrophedon
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2861
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
Location: Lincolnshire Wolds

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by Boustrophedon » Sat Sep 26, 2020 4:23 pm

Grumble wrote:
Sat Sep 26, 2020 3:50 pm
Boustrophedon wrote:
Sat Sep 26, 2020 12:48 pm
It all comes down to "Schoopage". Not new in battery construction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYP1sIu ... livedotcom
From that video it seemed like it was new in battery construction but not capacitors, and that one key difference is that capacitors don’t have an electrolyte to worry about.
Electrolytic capacitors do.
Hjulet snurrar men hamstern är död.

User avatar
Martin Y
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Re: Sub-$100/kWhr batteries

Post by Martin Y » Sat Sep 26, 2020 5:34 pm

I think it's probably fair to assume this won't be a case of nobody having thought of it before, but rather nobody having overcome various IABMCTT technical hurdles before.

Post Reply