The Biden Administration
Re: US Election
The transition is steaming ahead. The White House senior staff is in place (lots of ex-Obama staff). Today we've had foreign and nat security appointments (lots of ex-Obama officials). Looks very Obama term-3 ish.
https://buildbackbetter.com/the-adminis ... ppointees/
https://buildbackbetter.com/the-adminis ... ppointees/
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7075
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
The Biden Administration
New Administration New Thread
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7075
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: The Biden Administration
Antony Blinken to be Secretary of State
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/23/politics ... index.html
Fun fact, he grew up in France and speaks fluent French.
ETA John Kerry also spoke French.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/23/politics ... index.html
Fun fact, he grew up in France and speaks fluent French.
ETA John Kerry also spoke French.
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10137
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: US Election
Hooray! Make America Great Again!lpm wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 7:15 pmThe transition is steaming ahead. The White House senior staff is in place (lots of ex-Obama staff). Today we've had foreign and nat security appointments (lots of ex-Obama officials). Looks very Obama term-3 ish.
https://buildbackbetter.com/the-adminis ... ppointees/
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
-
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm
Re: The Biden Administration
Looks like the Biden administration has opened an embassy in the climate.
- sTeamTraen
- After Pie
- Posts: 2558
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
- Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Re: The Biden Administration
I seem to recall seeing John Kerry speaking French on TV once, and also Mitt Romney (who spent time in Europe on that programme the Mormons have where their smartly dressed young members accost people in the street, usually in English - it's hilarious). My recollection is that neither actually spoke French in a way that would get, say, François Hollande or Emmanuel Macron to send their interpreters home for the day, unlike (to my surprise) Tony Blair, whose French seems to be quite good for someone who has not lived in a French-speaking country for a long time. Blair was filmed once visiting Sarkozy and the two got on like a house on fire, all in French. (Macron has, I think, a reasonable working grasp of English, as you would need for the career that he had in finance, but he still has Ze Outrageous Accehhhnt.)
Something something hammer something something nail
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: The Biden Administration
So who had 22nd November 2020 down for the “First Liberal Whinge About the Biden Administration” sweepstake?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... erful-post
Something something something may as well have let Trump win.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... erful-post
Something something something may as well have let Trump win.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
Re: The Biden Administration
Antony Blinken does not seem too impressed with Brexit...
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
- sTeamTraen
- After Pie
- Posts: 2558
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
- Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Re: The Biden Administration
What else was Biden meant to do? Anyway, as of an hour ago he seems to gave got the Federal money. Looks like the coup might be over.Little waster wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 10:35 pmSo who had 22nd November 2020 down for the “First Liberal Whinge About the Biden Administration” sweepstake?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... erful-post
Something something something may as well have let Trump win.
Something something hammer something something nail
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: The Biden Administration
Care taken, it seems, to avoid leaving openings that might be difficult to fill if the Georgia runoffs don't give him senate control. Yellen, for example, as treasury secretary leaves Brainard in her role at the federal reserve, meaning there won't be an opportunity for the Republicans to mess about with the federal reserve.
Re: The Biden Administration
And lots of people who have already held roles, usually in the Obama Administration, so they can hit the ground running.
However, I'm sure there'll be cries of "Biden's re-stocking the swamp!"
However, I'm sure there'll be cries of "Biden's re-stocking the swamp!"
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"
Re: The Biden Administration
Agency transition teams:
https://buildbackbetter.gov/the-transit ... iew-teams/
https://buildbackbetter.gov/the-transit ... iew-teams/
Re: The Biden Administration
They are expecting to find everything in a bit of a mess, so it makes sense to bring in people who can remember what it used to be like.
- tenchboy
- After Pie
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:18 pm
- Location: Down amongst the potamogeton.
Re: The Biden Administration
S'gonna be like going into a museum store-room and finding nothing but empty shelves.
"Where is everything?"
"Ah, it was just a load of old sh.t that han't been used for ages: we tidied it up and chucked it out"
If you want me Steve, just Snapchat me yeah? You know how to Snapchap me doncha Steve? You just...
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10137
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: The Biden Administration
I didn't really view that as a criticism on Biden specifically, so much as the culture of partisan funding for government transition:Little waster wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 10:35 pmSo who had 22nd November 2020 down for the “First Liberal Whinge About the Biden Administration” sweepstake?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... erful-post
Something something something may as well have let Trump win.
Seems to lay the ultimate blame at Trump's feet, so "may as well have elected Trump" is a total strawman there.Such pleading erodes the distinction between campaigning and governance. It provides partisan funding for what is part of the state. At a time when America is so polarised, such funding makes it more difficult to be a “president for all Americans”. It further privatises governance, leverages the power of lobbyists and special interests and undermines the authority of the president-elect: the most powerful figure in the world begging for your loose change.
Trump’s refusal to accept the election result and the farcical conspiracy theories peddled by his lawyers are undermining US democracy, but in the long term there is something deeply corrosive about turning transition into a crowd-funded partisan process.
It's hardly an original observation that the amount of private money in US politics leads to wide-open vulnerabilities to corruption, so it's right to be concerned about a development that increases that. Maybe Biden had no choice because he and the Democratic Party have spent all their funds on the election and don't have $10m left.
If that's the case, the federal government needs to ensure this can't happen again, and I'm sure Biden's already working on a plan to fix it. For instance, maybe the GSA shouldn't need presidential approval to release funding?
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: The Biden Administration
Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:08 amI didn't really view that as a criticism on Biden specifically, so much as the culture of partisan funding for government transition:Little waster wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 10:35 pmSo who had 22nd November 2020 down for the “First Liberal Whinge About the Biden Administration” sweepstake?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... erful-post
Something something something may as well have let Trump win.Seems to lay the ultimate blame at Trump's feet, so "may as well have elected Trump" is a total strawman there.Such pleading erodes the distinction between campaigning and governance. It provides partisan funding for what is part of the state. At a time when America is so polarised, such funding makes it more difficult to be a “president for all Americans”. It further privatises governance, leverages the power of lobbyists and special interests and undermines the authority of the president-elect: the most powerful figure in the world begging for your loose change.
Trump’s refusal to accept the election result and the farcical conspiracy theories peddled by his lawyers are undermining US democracy, but in the long term there is something deeply corrosive about turning transition into a crowd-funded partisan process.
It's hardly an original observation that the amount of private money in US politics leads to wide-open vulnerabilities to corruption, so it's right to be concerned about a development that increases that. Maybe Biden had no choice because he and the Democratic Party have spent all their funds on the election and don't have $10m left.
If that's the case, the federal government needs to ensure this can't happen again, and I'm sure Biden's already working on a plan to fix it. For instance, maybe the GSA shouldn't need presidential approval to release funding?
Fair points but the strapline was:-
Now you can put that down to the sub-editor however the implication (and the hook driving the clicks) is that Biden is just like Trump in openly "grifting" off his supporters, to the point they even use that exact word.There is something absurd about grifting from the very people who voted for him
We were used to it with Trump, but with this the Guardian feeds the swamp notion and the sense that they are really just as bad as each other, which drives apathy and makes you wonder why they are pushing that narrative even before Biden walks in the door.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10137
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: The Biden Administration
Well - could the Dems really not find $10m without sending out a newsletter asking supporters for it? It does feel a bit gross and irresponsible.
I agree that the headline and strapline were probably a subeditor, probably trying to generate some clickbaity controversy.
I agree that the headline and strapline were probably a subeditor, probably trying to generate some clickbaity controversy.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: The Biden Administration
Just to point out from that articleLittle waster wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 10:35 pmSo who had 22nd November 2020 down for the “First Liberal Whinge About the Biden Administration” sweepstake?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... erful-post
Something something something may as well have let Trump win.
Somebody should have caught that earlierThis article was amended on 22 November 2020 because the amount the US government normally funds an administration transition process is $10m, not $10bn as an earlier version said.
Out by $990m, but who cares?
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7075
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: The Biden Administration
I really don't know. Campaign finance laws are complicated so I don't know whether the Democrats are able to move funds from one account to another.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:32 amWell - could the Dems really not find $10m without sending out a newsletter asking supporters for it? It does feel a bit gross and irresponsible.
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10137
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: The Biden Administration
Mmm. But this isn't campaigning any more - he's won. This is just getting on with being president-elect.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:42 amI really don't know. Campaign finance laws are complicated so I don't know whether the Democrats are able to move funds from one account to another.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:32 amWell - could the Dems really not find $10m without sending out a newsletter asking supporters for it? It does feel a bit gross and irresponsible.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: The Biden Administration
The Fifth Risk by Michael Lewis describes Trump's initial failure to engage with establishing a transition team - particularly in the pre-election period
He only agreed to continue funding the transition team preparations when it was clear that if he didn't it would show he didn't expect to winThe first time Donald Trump paid attention to any of this was when he read about it in the newspaper. The story revealed that Trump’s very own transition team, led by New Jersey governor Chris Christie, had raised several million dollars to pay the staff. The moment he saw it, Trump called Steve Bannon, the chief executive of his campaign, from his office, on the twenty-sixth floor of Trump Tower, and told him to come immediately to his residence, many floors above. Bannon stepped off the elevator to find the governor of New Jersey seated on a sofa, being hollered at. Trump was apoplectic, actually yelling, You’re stealing my money! You’re stealing my f.cking money! What the f.ck is this??
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
Re: The Biden Administration
$9,990 millioncvb wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:37 amJust to point out from that articleLittle waster wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 10:35 pmSo who had 22nd November 2020 down for the “First Liberal Whinge About the Biden Administration” sweepstake?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... erful-post
Something something something may as well have let Trump win.
Somebody should have caught that earlierThis article was amended on 22 November 2020 because the amount the US government normally funds an administration transition process is $10m, not $10bn as an earlier version said.
Out by $990m, but who cares?
And remember that if you botch the exit, the carnival of reaction may be coming to a town near you.
Fintan O'Toole
Fintan O'Toole
Re: The Biden Administration
Am I alone among ageing computer scientists to hope that, following the nomination of Mr Blinken, Biden will be able to find a Mr Lichten to complete the team?
And when it starts to slide
Let it go
Leave it behind
Let it go
Leave it behind
Re: The Biden Administration
Transition funds are their own political action, and not a thing you can spend campaign money onBird on a Fire wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 10:02 amMmm. But this isn't campaigning any more - he's won. This is just getting on with being president-elect.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:42 amI really don't know. Campaign finance laws are complicated so I don't know whether the Democrats are able to move funds from one account to another.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:32 amWell - could the Dems really not find $10m without sending out a newsletter asking supporters for it? It does feel a bit gross and irresponsible.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: The Biden Administration
Which is something that takes money, money they were meant to receive from the government, but did not receive in a timely fashion because of a mixture of politics and cowardice from someone who had the clear responsibility to grant them that money. The article was sh.tty clickbait, end of.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 10:02 amMmm. But this isn't campaigning any more - he's won. This is just getting on with being president-elect.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:42 amI really don't know. Campaign finance laws are complicated so I don't know whether the Democrats are able to move funds from one account to another.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:32 amWell - could the Dems really not find $10m without sending out a newsletter asking supporters for it? It does feel a bit gross and irresponsible.