Flag w.nker.shpalman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 6:26 pmMatt Hancock tweets it, like a f.cking tw.t
f.cking state of these people
Vaccine rollout in the UK
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
Congratulations! Less than 1% of the population have received part-protection!shpalman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 6:26 pmMatt Hancock tweets it, like a f.cking tw.t
f.cking state of these people
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 1621
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:02 am
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
The first dose probably has some effect (though I don't think the trials measured it very much). From a population point of view, is it more useful to have 800,000 people who have had the first dose or 400,000 who have had both? One of the factors to consider is that if you are in the first situation, and more vaccine becomes available, you get to 800,000 people fully treated faster than from the second (because the next 400,000 have to wait between doses).mediocrity511 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 6:41 pmSo we have 800,000 doses delivered so far and have used over half of them on first doses. Better hope there's no delays getting hold of the next batch...
-
- Stargoon
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:44 pm
- Location: Stourbridge
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
We have just been informed that Blackcountrygirl (she is only 80) and I will have our first dose on 30 December and the second dose on 20 January.
- discovolante
- Light of Blast
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
Congratulations!
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.
-
- Stargoon
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:44 pm
- Location: Stourbridge
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
There was me thinking that when people didn't turn up for their jab it would go to front line staff to save it being wasted. Stupid old me.
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/m ... D6IRkIOor8
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/m ... D6IRkIOor8
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
In other news, some people are egocentric a..holes.Blackcountryboy wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 5:05 pmThere was me thinking that when people didn't turn up for their jab it would go to front line staff to save it being wasted. Stupid old me.
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/m ... D6IRkIOor8
Although this is indeed a particularly fine example of that.
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
So far only 57 of the country’s 135 NHS acute hospital trusts have had a delivery of the vaccine
Two-thirds of GPs haven't received any yet either.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- Trinucleus
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1047
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
Well, what happens if you're late with the second dose? Does the first dose eventually "expire"?Trinucleus wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 11:57 amTony Blair says they're doing it wrong
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55410349
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
Jeremy Corbyn says we should have done it with some sort of anarco-collective or somethingTrinucleus wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 11:57 amTony Blair says they're doing it wrong
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55410349
https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status ... 3873310720
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
Don't some journals effectively ban the phrase "more research is needed"?shpalman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:02 pmWell, what happens if you're late with the second dose? Does the first dose eventually "expire"?Trinucleus wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 11:57 amTony Blair says they're doing it wrong
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55410349
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
On the vaccine, Hancock said the government will be “publishing tomorrow the full data on the vaccination programme so far” and also that next year is also mostly f.cked.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
Yay, "first dose total" has appeared at https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/healthcare
it's at 616,933 so there's clearly the plan to get through the first delivery of 800,000 rather than save half for second doses.
it's at 616,933 so there's clearly the plan to get through the first delivery of 800,000 rather than save half for second doses.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
predictable backlash from those who are supposed to give the vaccine without receiving it themselves
But realizing that if your health care workers get ill there'll be nobody to deliver the vaccines should be a good enough reason to suggest they're allowed to get vaccinated first.
ministers decreeing that 75% of supplies of the Pfizer jab should be given to those over 80 and 20% to care home personnel, leaving just 5% – or 48 doses from a batch of 975 – for NHS staff.
Except of course we don't know if this vaccine stops people from passing this virus on, because we haven't checked (personally, I think it does).“Vaccines stop people from passing viruses on. We have limited vaccines available. Who is most in need of a vaccine? The people who are forced to mix with others. And those people are the frontline healthcare staff looking after Covid-19 patients, who encounter Covid-19 continually.”
But realizing that if your health care workers get ill there'll be nobody to deliver the vaccines should be a good enough reason to suggest they're allowed to get vaccinated first.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
Tessa K wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 8:43 amThe Oxford vaccine just got approval but being realistic, how long is it going to take to vaccinate everyone (twice) and what happens in the meantime? I'm not expecting to get called for a jab until well into the spring.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55280671
Vaccinating 1 million people a week sounds like a lot but it's not enough.shpalman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 8:03 amOnly 25 million? That wouldn't even be enough for everyone over 40.29 NHSE&I is currently planning on the assumption that up to 25 million people could be vaccinated against COVID-19 in England throughout 2021 provided sufficient doses of vaccine are available.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- Tessa K
- Light of Blast
- Posts: 4840
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:07 pm
- Location: Closer than you'd like
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
That's less than half the population (England currently around 56 million) and two caveats in the same sentence: could be... provided...shpalman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 8:57 amTessa K wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 8:43 amThe Oxford vaccine just got approval but being realistic, how long is it going to take to vaccinate everyone (twice) and what happens in the meantime? I'm not expecting to get called for a jab until well into the spring.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55280671Vaccinating 1 million people a week sounds like a lot but it's not enough.shpalman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 8:03 amOnly 25 million? That wouldn't even be enough for everyone over 40.29 NHSE&I is currently planning on the assumption that up to 25 million people could be vaccinated against COVID-19 in England throughout 2021 provided sufficient doses of vaccine are available.
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
Didn't New York manage 6 million in about 3 weeks with Smallpox Vaccine?Tessa K wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 9:06 amThat's less than half the population (England currently around 56 million) and two caveats in the same sentence: could be... provided...shpalman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 8:57 amTessa K wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 8:43 amThe Oxford vaccine just got approval but being realistic, how long is it going to take to vaccinate everyone (twice) and what happens in the meantime? I'm not expecting to get called for a jab until well into the spring.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55280671Vaccinating 1 million people a week sounds like a lot but it's not enough.
Our local pharmacist has been looking for a local vaccination venue to operate 7 days per week/12 hour days. I guess we're going to need a lot of these very quickly! And people to staff them. NHS responder app has been sending out pleas for volunteers but it's going to be a monumental effort (if they even want to try for a properly 'game-changing moonshot' vaccination programme).
Great news re Oxford Vaccine. Have they published new results study yet? Or do we still have to take ~95% on trust?
- discovolante
- Light of Blast
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
See the 'developing the Covid vaccine' thread.badger wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 9:58 amDidn't New York manage 6 million in about 3 weeks with Smallpox Vaccine?
Our local pharmacist has been looking for a local vaccination venue to operate 7 days per week/12 hour days. I guess we're going to need a lot of these very quickly! And people to staff them. NHS responder app has been sending out pleas for volunteers but it's going to be a monumental effort (if they even want to try for a properly 'game-changing moonshot' vaccination programme).
Great news re Oxford Vaccine. Have they published new results study yet? Or do we still have to take ~95% on trust?
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
My sister is administering the Pfizer vaccine. Apparently you’re not allowed to even shake the vial, it’s so delicate. I do wonder if some vaccine doses will be ineffective because of that?
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
Thanks Disco, greatness of news slightly curtailed, it seems.
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
I think the rollout will be easy. Even this government should be able to manage it.
It's a single product in a single process. This contrasts with test & trace which is multiple components needing to be brought together effectively, with complicated human behaviours needing to be changed.
All it takes is dragging in retirees and other people with medical experience, give them a bit of training, set up a centre, then get the supply of humans steadily walking or driving through. Reports from other countries show a festival atmosphere at mass vaccination sites, people enjoying the day despite queues lasting for hours.
I got a flu jab a few weeks ago, outside, with appointment times allowing 60 seconds per person, two jabbers at work so a person every 30 seconds. A centre will need a handful of admin people, some assistants to unpack vials, a coffee van, entertainment in the post-jab waiting area... Easy enough to add in friendly volunteers, e.g. the local vicar or women's institute, to keep the celebration moving along. As a country we have plenty of unused adminstrators and helpers currently on furlough - e.g. airline cabin crew - who can be taken on as helpers. The military can help with logistics but I suspect normal distribution systems are easily good enough.
Two million a week is only around 50,000 per hour. A couple of thousand jabbers could do that at the mass vaccination centres. Probably need another thousand to do the harder outreach stuff in nursing homes and other community living places.
My concern is lack of ambition, rather than the process. The government tends to do things half-heartedly and on the cheap. It needs to be bold. A true popularist would realise this is a chance for a national patriotic bonding event, something to enter the nation's mythology like singing songs during the blitz. But Johnson has pretty poor instincts for popularism.
It's a single product in a single process. This contrasts with test & trace which is multiple components needing to be brought together effectively, with complicated human behaviours needing to be changed.
All it takes is dragging in retirees and other people with medical experience, give them a bit of training, set up a centre, then get the supply of humans steadily walking or driving through. Reports from other countries show a festival atmosphere at mass vaccination sites, people enjoying the day despite queues lasting for hours.
I got a flu jab a few weeks ago, outside, with appointment times allowing 60 seconds per person, two jabbers at work so a person every 30 seconds. A centre will need a handful of admin people, some assistants to unpack vials, a coffee van, entertainment in the post-jab waiting area... Easy enough to add in friendly volunteers, e.g. the local vicar or women's institute, to keep the celebration moving along. As a country we have plenty of unused adminstrators and helpers currently on furlough - e.g. airline cabin crew - who can be taken on as helpers. The military can help with logistics but I suspect normal distribution systems are easily good enough.
Two million a week is only around 50,000 per hour. A couple of thousand jabbers could do that at the mass vaccination centres. Probably need another thousand to do the harder outreach stuff in nursing homes and other community living places.
My concern is lack of ambition, rather than the process. The government tends to do things half-heartedly and on the cheap. It needs to be bold. A true popularist would realise this is a chance for a national patriotic bonding event, something to enter the nation's mythology like singing songs during the blitz. But Johnson has pretty poor instincts for popularism.
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
Those 10-15% most vulnerable would be of the order of 6-9 million people. The UK has given Margaret Keenan her second dose but I still haven't seen how many first doses have been given last week. My main question would be if the ~500,000 who had their first doses in the week before that represented the whole of the available capacity which means from now on everyone will be busy giving second doses, and if/when ~1 million doses per week would be reached.sTeamTraen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 11:24 amIt will be interesting to see what happens when most of the 10-15% most vulnerable people are vaccinated and so the death and hospitalisation rates drop, say by mid-February for deaths and mid-March for hospital admissions. There could be a lot less popular support for lockdown measures if the numbers of deaths fall to the "typical flu season" level. If at that point they open the pubs, you could have half a million cases a day shortly afterwards and then you'd have the same number of deaths and hospitalisations among younger people, just at the rate of 0.02% of cases instead of 5%.Tessa K wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 8:43 amThe Oxford vaccine just got approval but being realistic, how long is it going to take to vaccinate everyone (twice) and what happens in the meantime? I'm not expecting to get called for a jab until well into the spring.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55280671
There may also be quite a good effect from the first dose of the vaccine. Obviously we all have to follow the protocol, but I don't think the effect of the first dose will be zero.
So do we think those 10-15% will have been done by the end of March?
(But it could at least get to the point where both the weather and the number of people vaccinated allows a bit of outdoor pubbery to start happening. It would be difficult to argue for forbidding it, based on whatever the new-infections and deaths numbers are doing. I'd hope to argue for waiting a bit longer before reopening so that there's a bit more control over what happens.)
Has that order of 10 5 million Pfizer doses starting arriving yet? The original batch of 800,000 must have been all used by now.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
Re: Vaccine rollout in the UK
I find it hard to think in those terms. Consider a medium-sized town of 200,000 people -- York, Portsmouth, Peterborough, Aberdeen. Suppose you are able to process four doses a minute -- assuming a minute per dose that might be two centres with two process lines each. Assume a single shift pattern, i.e. each process line works for 7 hours a day, 20 days a month. That's six months to do half the population with two doses. If there are no manufacturing or distribution bottlenecks, I agree, that seems a decidedly unambitious level of activity. So we really ought to be able to get everyone done before summer just looking at the logistics of doing the jabbing.