Wut? Really?!?!?!
US 2021 Capitol insurrection
-
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1510
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 2396
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
I think it’s 3pm ET which is 8pm in the UKlpm wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 1:23 pmWhat do we reckon to the odds of Trump objecting? He has to respond at 3pm foreign time, I believe.
I'm assuming he'll refuse to let them be unsealed. It sounds like the judge is supposed to give preference to his views - the judge can in theory decide to unseal despite Trump's objections, but would be unlikely to do so in practice.
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
1:15 to go.Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 5:44 pmI think it’s 3pm ET which is 8pm in the UKlpm wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 1:23 pmWhat do we reckon to the odds of Trump objecting? He has to respond at 3pm foreign time, I believe.
I'm assuming he'll refuse to let them be unsealed. It sounds like the judge is supposed to give preference to his views - the judge can in theory decide to unseal despite Trump's objections, but would be unlikely to do so in practice.
- Rich Scopie
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:21 pm
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
He claims not to be opposing it.dyqik wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 5:44 pm1:15 to go.Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 5:44 pmI think it’s 3pm ET which is 8pm in the UKlpm wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 1:23 pmWhat do we reckon to the odds of Trump objecting? He has to respond at 3pm foreign time, I believe.
I'm assuming he'll refuse to let them be unsealed. It sounds like the judge is supposed to give preference to his views - the judge can in theory decide to unseal despite Trump's objections, but would be unlikely to do so in practice.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-62512360
It first was a rumour dismissed as a lie, but then came the evidence none could deny:
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
https://twitter.com/IntelCrab/status/15 ... 8038044675
OuchBreitbart (of all sources) suggests former President Donald Trump is being investigated for violating the Espionage Act.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
It's like one of those twisty turny movies or books.
You know he'll get away with it. But you can't for the life of you see how.
You know he'll get away with it. But you can't for the life of you see how.
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 2396
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
Trump leaked it to his favourite media outlets without obscuring the FBI agents names so Breitbart has doxed them.jimbob wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 6:54 pmhttps://twitter.com/IntelCrab/status/15 ... 8038044675
OuchBreitbart (of all sources) suggests former President Donald Trump is being investigated for violating the Espionage Act.
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 2396
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
Trump should know https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-get ... -all-wrong
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 2396
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
Thread on what the WSJ has listed but there could be omissions from the official release because corrupt bastards https://twitter.com/muellershewrote/sta ... OKmgFIQFZw
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
Not sure, nor whether interference in an investigation is
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status ... NiuK7Ehi5w
Kyle Griffin
@kylegriffin1
The FBI search related to possible violations of 3 statutes:
- The Espionage Act
- A law prohibiting the destruction/concealment of documents to obstruct an investigation
- The unlawful removal of government materials
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 2396
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
WTF did they have on Macron?
https://twitter.com/robertmaguire_/stat ... OKmgFIQFZw
Looks like noting was declassified despite Trump supporters saying that (it can’t be done telepathically) but anyway all three charges could apply whether or not the stuff was declassified
https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/sta ... OKmgFIQFZw
https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/sta ... OKmgFIQFZw
https://twitter.com/robertmaguire_/stat ... OKmgFIQFZw
Looks like noting was declassified despite Trump supporters saying that (it can’t be done telepathically) but anyway all three charges could apply whether or not the stuff was declassified
https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/sta ... OKmgFIQFZw
AlsoTrump could have violated all three criminal statutes *even if* he previously declassified the material in question, although there is no evidence that he did.
That takes one of his potential defenses—that he declassified the material without following procedure—off the table.
https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/sta ... OKmgFIQFZw
The Espionage Act is a broad statute. Violating it does *not* necessarily mean you’re spying on the United States.
Most experts expected the search warrant to cite the Espionage Act.
The unexpected statute cited was 18 USC 1519, usually used to prosecute obstruction.
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:18 pmWTF did they have on Macron?
https://twitter.com/robertmaguire_/stat ... OKmgFIQFZw
Looks like noting was declassified despite Trump supporters saying that (it can’t be done telepathically) but anyway all three charges could apply whether or not the stuff was declassified
https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/sta ... OKmgFIQFZw
AlsoTrump could have violated all three criminal statutes *even if* he previously declassified the material in question, although there is no evidence that he did.
That takes one of his potential defenses—that he declassified the material without following procedure—off the table.
https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/sta ... OKmgFIQFZw
The Espionage Act is a broad statute. Violating it does *not* necessarily mean you’re spying on the United States.
Most experts expected the search warrant to cite the Espionage Act.
The unexpected statute cited was 18 USC 1519, usually used to prosecute obstruction.
What did they have on Macron?
Corruption is traditional for senior French politicians. Thinking about Total, for example.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
The section of the Espionage Act that addresses "willfully retaining" sensitive documents and "failing to deliver them on demand" is 18 U.S.C. 793. The penalty is a fine or up to 10 years in prison. I have no idea how much a typical fine would be, or how much "up to 10" would typically be. Not that this case is typical anyway.
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
Yeah, but it could just be a state department report on what he's said about the Faroe Islands too. That bit wasn't lumped in with the "miscellaneous top secret documents", so I imagine it wasn't that bad. Of course, there could be other stuff about Macron in the Top secret and confidential bits, but I suspect we'll never find out, 'cos Top Secret and whatnot.
The conspiracy theorists are going to have fun with possibilities that confirm their worldview though.
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
Julian Assange is charged under the same code. Reality Winner jailed.
Would be a lovely script to have Trump sharing a cell with the cupboard hiding rapist.
Would be a lovely script to have Trump sharing a cell with the cupboard hiding rapist.
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
That's potentially per document, I think?bolo wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:31 pmThe section of the Espionage Act that addresses "willfully retaining" sensitive documents and "failing to deliver them on demand" is 18 U.S.C. 793. The penalty is a fine or up to 10 years in prison. I have no idea how much a typical fine would be, or how much "up to 10" would typically be. Not that this case is typical anyway.
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 2396
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
He and his family have Secret Service protection so they’re never going to prison although with a bit of luck we could get house arrest.
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 2396
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
Unsealed documents here https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 7.0_10.pdf
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
Eh?Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:51 pmHe and his family have Secret Service protection so they’re never going to prison although with a bit of luck we could get house arrest.
The secret service have to obey the law, just like everyone else. And the secret service protection can be withdrawn.
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
I'm amazed he let this be unsealed. He should have objected, leaked lies and muddied the waters.
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
I'm not entirely sure whether Secret Service protection can be withdrawn, as there is a statute specifically authorizing it. (Does a law saying "the Secret Service is authorized to X" mean they are also allowed to choose not to X? IANAL.)
But I see no reason why he couldn't still have Secret Service protection while in prison.
But I see no reason why he couldn't still have Secret Service protection while in prison.
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 2396
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
Not according to all the lawyers I heard discussing this on MSNBC but I claim no expertisedyqik wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 9:39 pmEh?Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:51 pmHe and his family have Secret Service protection so they’re never going to prison although with a bit of luck we could get house arrest.
The secret service have to obey the law, just like everyone else. And the secret service protection can be withdrawn.
ETA the kids may not be safe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Former_Presidents_Act
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
Re: US 2021 Capitol insurrection
Maybe the Secret Service will insist on very close protection, so no private meetings, no private phone calls, never alone and never unsupervised.Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 11:33 pmNot according to all the lawyers I heard discussing this on MSNBC but I claim no expertise
That would work....
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!