Road safety

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
User avatar
Martin Y
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Re: Road safety

Post by Martin Y » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:16 am

lpm wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:43 am
It's 2021 mate. We don't need bobbies on the beat checking windscreens for expired tax discs. Technology solves all this.
Lew Dolby wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:44 am
to me, a large part of the problem isn't weight, momentum, dick-heads - it's the vanishingly small chance that dickheadery will ever be caught and punished.
A handy juxtaposition. Technology like ANPR means that someone should have pretty good stats on how many untaxed and uninsured cars are on the road. The insurers reckon there are about a million. Doing something about it seems to be the hard part. Until the autonomous missile drone executioner fleet is up to full strength this remains a problem.

plodder
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:50 pm

Re: Road safety

Post by plodder » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:21 am

meh, the technology already exists to disable a non-legal car, it's just not fitted as standard.

The problem is this disproportionately impacts poorer people.

User avatar
Martin Y
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Re: Road safety

Post by Martin Y » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:31 am

plodder wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:21 am
meh, the technology already exists to disable a non-legal car, it's just not fitted as standard.

The problem is this disproportionately impacts poorer people.
So we should offer subsidies to make it free for poorer uninsured drivers to come and get disabling tech fitted to their untaxed and uninsured cars. Seems simple enough.

KAJ
Fuzzable
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: UK

Re: Road safety

Post by KAJ » Wed Mar 03, 2021 7:18 pm

lpm wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 9:41 am
Yes. The Dominic Cummings approach to rules. The roads are packed with people who think they are the best judge of safety rules and can pick & choose which ones to obey.

The current world is one where every idiot believes they are an expert and actual experts can f.ck off. It manifests itself as Brexit and lockdown breeches and tailgating.
Are they something like chastity belts?

(I'll get my coat.)

monkey
After Pie
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: Road safety

Post by monkey » Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:32 pm

I don't like the idea of limiting speed based on momentum/kinetic energy because I spend quite a lot of time on buses already and I don't want to spend more time on buses.

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 7527
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Road safety

Post by dyqik » Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:34 pm

monkey wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:32 pm
I don't like the idea of limiting speed based on momentum/kinetic energy because I spend quite a lot of time on buses already and I don't want to spend more time on buses.
K.E. per user could work.

monkey
After Pie
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: Road safety

Post by monkey » Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:43 pm

dyqik wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:34 pm
monkey wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:32 pm
I don't like the idea of limiting speed based on momentum/kinetic energy because I spend quite a lot of time on buses already and I don't want to spend more time on buses.
K.E. per user could work.
Buses aren't always full. How is it supposed to keep to a timetable if it doesn't know how fast it can go?

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 7527
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Road safety

Post by dyqik » Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:52 pm

monkey wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:43 pm
dyqik wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:34 pm
monkey wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:32 pm
I don't like the idea of limiting speed based on momentum/kinetic energy because I spend quite a lot of time on buses already and I don't want to spend more time on buses.
K.E. per user could work.
Buses aren't always full. How is it supposed to keep to a timetable if it doesn't know how fast it can go?
I missed out the words "in interesting ways".

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8244
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: Road safety

Post by shpalman » Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:55 pm

So that's a positive incentive for carpooling.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 7527
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Road safety

Post by dyqik » Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:13 pm

shpalman wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:55 pm
So that's a positive incentive for carpooling.
We already have HOV lanes here that encourage carpooling with a special lane that usually moves faster than the single occupancy car traffic.

Going 41% faster (or a little less if we're working on gross vehicle mass) for two people in a car, and double for four sounds like the right kind of return.

Buses etc. could use averaged occupancy so they can have timetables.

;)

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8244
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: Road safety

Post by shpalman » Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:17 pm

Holiday coaches would probably all crash though.

So not much change there.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

plodder
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:50 pm

Re: Road safety

Post by plodder » Thu Mar 04, 2021 8:56 am

dyqik wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:13 pm
shpalman wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:55 pm
So that's a positive incentive for carpooling.
We already have HOV lanes here that encourage carpooling with a special lane that usually moves faster than the single occupancy car traffic.

Going 41% faster (or a little less if we're working on gross vehicle mass) for two people in a car, and double for four sounds like the right kind of return.

Buses etc. could use averaged occupancy so they can have timetables.

;)
Or, if passengers were properly incentivised, the safest means of travel (ie the fastest when passenger numbers are factored in) would also be the most crowded.

By a happy coincidence this is also the most cost effective and environmentally friendly approach.

So what is needed is a rejigging of capitalism to reflect these real world physical realities.

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: Road safety

Post by lpm » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:09 am

Or people should stop rushing from A to B and from B to A, and just once and for all work out where they want to be.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
Martin_B
After Pie
Posts: 1614
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:20 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Re: Road safety

Post by Martin_B » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:35 am

lpm wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:09 am
Or people should stop rushing from A to B and from B to A, and just once and for all work out where they want to be.
Especially if you live at point C, being a point directly in between point A and point B, and are often given to wonder what's so great about point A that so many people from point B are so keen to get there, and what's so great about point B that so many people from point A are so keen to get there.
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"

User avatar
Boustrophedon
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2861
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
Location: Lincolnshire Wolds

Re: Road safety

Post by Boustrophedon » Thu Mar 04, 2021 10:05 am

To a certain extent I blame Volvo and Beeching. Beeching for taking goods transport off the railway and thus leading to more HGVs on the road. And Volvo for convincing everyone that passive safety was the best sort of safety, leading to a tank like mentality in car design.

André-Gustave Citroën delighted instead in super light agile cars, cars that could avoid accidents.

The result is that we endured a "safety arms race" where cars became heavier and heavier and so the thing they were designed to resist hitting became heavier and so on. Cars are, size for size, heavier than they were in the 70s.

Incidentally I don't get the BS about momentum, it's energy that bends metal, energy that smashes your skull against the steering wheel.

We should all be running around in (slower) light agile cars without HGVs to be frightened of and getting in our way.
Hjulet snurrar men hamstern är död.

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8244
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: Road safety

Post by shpalman » Thu Mar 04, 2021 10:19 am

If you hit something unmovable in your car, like a wall or a tree, then the car stops but the whole point is that you have to stop too.

Cars have crumple zones, airbags, and pre-tensioning seatbelts (whose mountings are designed to peel away from the bit of the car they're attached to) in order to make this deceleration controlled and survivable. It's your mass which is the issue, not the mass of the car.

Otherwise what other kind of accident are you talking about. Please provide stats to show which kinds of RTA lead to significant numbers of injuries and deaths.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

monkey
After Pie
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: Road safety

Post by monkey » Thu Mar 04, 2021 2:03 pm

shpalman wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 10:19 am
If you hit something unmovable in your car, like a wall or a tree, then the car stops but the whole point is that you have to stop too.

Cars have crumple zones, airbags, and pre-tensioning seatbelts (whose mountings are designed to peel away from the bit of the car they're attached to) in order to make this deceleration controlled and survivable. It's your mass which is the issue, not the mass of the car.

Otherwise what other kind of accident are you talking about. Please provide stats to show which kinds of RTA lead to significant numbers of injuries and deaths.
So the speed limit should be set by your body weight?

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8244
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: Road safety

Post by shpalman » Thu Mar 04, 2021 2:05 pm

Yes, children should be allowed to drive faster.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 7527
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Road safety

Post by dyqik » Thu Mar 04, 2021 2:07 pm

shpalman wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 2:05 pm
Yes, children should be allowed to drive faster.
They have faster reactions, better eyesight, are more resilient to injuries, and have more life to look forward to.

So that seems legit.

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8244
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: Road safety

Post by shpalman » Thu Mar 04, 2021 2:08 pm

You'll notice that F1 drivers are all quite small. This is why.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: Road safety

Post by lpm » Thu Mar 04, 2021 2:59 pm

You're saying small men compensate with fast cars?
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8244
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: Road safety

Post by shpalman » Thu Mar 04, 2021 3:37 pm

Well, the really tiny ones ride motorbikes.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
Martin Y
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Re: Road safety

Post by Martin Y » Thu Mar 04, 2021 4:37 pm

shpalman wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 3:37 pm
Well, the really tiny ones ride motorbikes.
An ex boss of mine had a specially sculpted saddle (i.e. pared down to almost nothing in the middle) so he could ride his beloved Moto Guzzi without dropping it every time he had to stop.

plodder
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:50 pm

Re: Road safety

Post by plodder » Thu Mar 04, 2021 4:48 pm

bet it made his pee pee feel funny too

User avatar
Martin Y
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Re: Road safety

Post by Martin Y » Thu Mar 04, 2021 5:29 pm

plodder wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 4:48 pm
bet it made his pee pee feel funny too
I didn't notice.

Post Reply