Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Post Reply
User avatar
bob sterman
Dorkwood
Posts: 1123
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm
Location: Location Location

Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by bob sterman » Wed Mar 03, 2021 9:48 am

Daily Mail owner buys New Scientist magazine in £70m deal
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... n-70m-deal

:o :x :evil:

User avatar
Martin Y
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by Martin Y » Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:10 am

Worrying, but I expect that editorially they'll leave it the f.ck alone.

Still, it does lead one to speculate on what a Daily Mail New Scientist story would look like. Recent discoveries indicate that future minor celebrities may be able to become up to 250% more beach-ready thanks to this revolutionary one weird trick.

User avatar
Fishnut
After Pie
Posts: 2447
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:15 pm
Location: UK

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by Fishnut » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:01 am

I used to read NS avidly as a teen but I got increasingly disillusioned with it in the mid-2000s and eventually stopped subscribing. Their "Darwin Was Wrong" front cover was really the nail in the coffin for me as it was clearly a clickbait headline that they knew was sensationalist but did it anyway. They significantly reduced the number of books they reviewed and the articles seemed to be increasingly speculative. I don't know whether it's improved in recent years but its ownership by the DMG doesn't exactly inspire me to give it another go.
it's okay to say "I don't know"

User avatar
malbui
Fuzzable
Posts: 315
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:25 am

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by malbui » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:18 am

Fishnut wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:01 am
I used to read NS avidly as a teen but I got increasingly disillusioned with it in the mid-2000s and eventually stopped subscribing. Their "Darwin Was Wrong" front cover was really the nail in the coffin for me as it was clearly a clickbait headline that they knew was sensationalist but did it anyway. They significantly reduced the number of books they reviewed and the articles seemed to be increasingly speculative. I don't know whether it's improved in recent years but its ownership by the DMG doesn't exactly inspire me to give it another go.
I was a subscriber well into the 90s but walked away when the articles turned markedly to the speculative clickbait, as you say, and the bulk of the magazine was adverts for jobs that weren't at all relevant to me.
And when it starts to slide
Let it go
Leave it behind

User avatar
Martin Y
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by Martin Y » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:18 am

Fishnut wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:01 am
I used to read NS avidly as a teen but I got increasingly disillusioned with it in the mid-2000s and eventually stopped subscribing. Their "Darwin Was Wrong" front cover was really the nail in the coffin for me as it was clearly a clickbait headline that they knew was sensationalist but did it anyway. They significantly reduced the number of books they reviewed and the articles seemed to be increasingly speculative. I don't know whether it's improved in recent years but its ownership by the DMG doesn't exactly inspire me to give it another go.
You are me and I claim my £5.

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8241
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by shpalman » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:32 am

I think I had a phase of reading it while I was doing my PhD, but the way they reported on science which I knew something about led me to believe that also everything else they wrote was essentially b.llsh.t.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
Boustrophedon
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2860
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
Location: Lincolnshire Wolds

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by Boustrophedon » Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:59 pm

Given the lightweight journalism in both the Mail and the New Scientist, can I suggest this thread is moved to Relaxation Station?
Hjulet snurrar men hamstern är död.

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5276
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by jimbob » Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:55 pm

Fishnut wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:01 am
I used to read NS avidly as a teen but I got increasingly disillusioned with it in the mid-2000s and eventually stopped subscribing. Their "Darwin Was Wrong" front cover was really the nail in the coffin for me as it was clearly a clickbait headline that they knew was sensationalist but did it anyway. They significantly reduced the number of books they reviewed and the articles seemed to be increasingly speculative. I don't know whether it's improved in recent years but its ownership by the DMG doesn't exactly inspire me to give it another go.
Likewise.

Dad told me that bought the first issue. I think it had an article about the interesting new geological theory of continental drift
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
Aitch
Snowbonk
Posts: 545
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2019 9:53 am
Location: St Aines

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by Aitch » Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:02 pm

It's not been the same since they dropped Grimbledon Down. :(
Some people call me strange.
I prefer unconventional.
But I'm willing to compromise and accept eccentric
.

User avatar
science_fox
Snowbonk
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:34 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by science_fox » Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:04 pm

Fishnut wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:01 am
I used to read NS avidly as a teen but I got increasingly disillusioned with it in the mid-2000s and eventually stopped subscribing. Their "Darwin Was Wrong" front cover was really the nail in the coffin for me as it was clearly a clickbait headline that they knew was sensationalist but did it anyway. They significantly reduced the number of books they reviewed and the articles seemed to be increasingly speculative. I don't know whether it's improved in recent years but its ownership by the DMG doesn't exactly inspire me to give it another go.
I still read it because it allows me to learn something in areas far wider than my work covers. The last couple of years they've reviewed a few books, but added in reviews of films/games/podcasts etc that have a science bent to them. The articles vary in depth and speculative nature, I do wish they'd be clearer as to which ones are reports of actual reviewed findings, and which are just speculation. (I was quite annoyed that the last one featured Metabolism , and all sounded sensible until the final points when you realised it was free advertising for the much debunked ultra-processed food people).

Given the delays in brining even a weekly magazine to print/email, vs the speed of online reporting, you do have to wonder quite what NS's purpose is - other than making money from gullible people like me.

Are there alternate trustworthy, wide topic, generally approachable, moderately priced (eg not nature?) alternatives? I'm a chemist, so I also receive Chemistry World and it's frankly barely readable apart from the areas you know something about. One year (for an xmas special) they managed to create 5 pages of article on the chemistry of chocolate, which should have been fascinating. Like trying 100% dark chocolate, it came out incredibly dry. I'd never stand to read that for fields that I'm only curious about.
I'm not afraid of catching Covid, I'm afraid of catching idiot.

User avatar
Boustrophedon
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2860
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
Location: Lincolnshire Wolds

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by Boustrophedon » Wed Mar 03, 2021 4:39 pm

Aitch wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:02 pm
It's not been the same since they dropped Grimbledon Down. :(
Or since David Jones AKA Daedalus departed.

I remember an epic war of words between the back pages of the New Scientist and the platform notice board at Northwood Metropolitan line station, It carried on for several weeks til the high ups at London Transport put a stop to it.
Northwood underground station was well known for the quality of the announcements: "The next train is delayed due to technical thingies." Which was what had started it.
Hjulet snurrar men hamstern är död.

User avatar
JQH
After Pie
Posts: 2141
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:30 pm
Location: Sar Flandan

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by JQH » Wed Mar 03, 2021 4:56 pm

shpalman wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:32 am
I think I had a phase of reading it while I was doing my PhD, but the way they reported on science which I knew something about led me to believe that also everything else they wrote was essentially b.llsh.t.
I remember in the Previous Place, Duck once commented that their coverage of psychology was shite and asked were they as bad on the physical sciences.
And remember that if you botch the exit, the carnival of reaction may be coming to a town near you.

Fintan O'Toole

User avatar
sTeamTraen
After Pie
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by sTeamTraen » Wed Mar 03, 2021 5:03 pm

JQH wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 4:56 pm
shpalman wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:32 am
I think I had a phase of reading it while I was doing my PhD, but the way they reported on science which I knew something about led me to believe that also everything else they wrote was essentially b.llsh.t.
I remember in the Previous Place, Duck once commented that their coverage of psychology was shite and asked were they as bad on the physical sciences.
Yes, I've been slightly surprised at the negative reactions to this news on Twitter. If you'd told me that NS was already owned by DMGT I wouldn't have fallen off my chair; it doesn't have a good reputation among social scientists, at least. (The interview that the Dutch edition did with me a couple of years ago was absolutely brilliant, of course.)
Something something hammer something something nail

User avatar
El Pollo Diablo
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
Location: FBPE

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by El Pollo Diablo » Thu Mar 04, 2021 4:30 pm

Boustrophedon wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 4:39 pm
Aitch wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:02 pm
It's not been the same since they dropped Grimbledon Down. :(
Or since David Jones AKA Daedalus departed.

I remember an epic war of words between the back pages of the New Scientist and the platform notice board at Northwood Metropolitan line station, It carried on for several weeks til the high ups at London Transport put a stop to it.
Northwood underground station was well known for the quality of the announcements: "The next train is delayed due to technical thingies." Which was what had started it.
... what?
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued

User avatar
tenchboy
After Pie
Posts: 1891
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:18 pm
Location: Down amongst the potamogeton.

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by tenchboy » Thu Mar 04, 2021 7:31 pm

El Pollo Diablo wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 4:30 pm
Boustrophedon wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 4:39 pm
Aitch wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:02 pm
It's not been the same since they dropped Grimbledon Down. :(
Or since David Jones AKA Daedalus departed.

I remember an epic war of words between the back pages of the New Scientist and the platform notice board at Northwood Metropolitan line station, It carried on for several weeks til the high ups at London Transport put a stop to it.
Northwood underground station was well known for the quality of the announcements: "The next train is delayed due to technical thingies." Which was what had started it.
... what?
Don't come the wide eyed innocence: we all know it was you!
If you want me Steve, just Snapchat me yeah? You know how to Snapchap me doncha Steve? You just...

Chris Preston
Snowbonk
Posts: 529
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:05 am

Re: Daily Mail group buys New Scientist

Post by Chris Preston » Fri Mar 05, 2021 3:09 am

bob sterman wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 9:48 am
Daily Mail owner buys New Scientist magazine in £70m deal
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... n-70m-deal

:o :x :evil:
I am not sure it will make that much difference. New Scientist has done a poor job of reporting on science for many years now.
Here grows much rhubarb.

Post Reply