Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
User avatar
bjn
Dorkwood
Posts: 1466
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:58 pm

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by bjn » Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:11 pm

The energy cost of the block chain itself is near zero, it's just some bits representing a ledger of transactions sitting on storage somewhere. You could turn all the storage off, and the block chain would still exist for zero energy.

However, the cost of recording transactions in the blockchain is f.cking insane. It consumed 121 terawatt-hours in 2020, to record at most 315,360,000 transactions (as it's capped at 10 transactions/second). Which works out to be 383kWh per transaction.

Imagine if every time you purchased something with your debit card it consumed 383kWh, that's the comparison you need to be making.

It's a libertarian farce, eminently scammable (see NFT thread) and an environmental nightmare.

plodder
After Pie
Posts: 2011
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:50 pm

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by plodder » Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:13 pm

Yeah, we're straying into LibTard territory now which is where I lose focus. When something is 'self-evidently' better to the zealots but it can't be explained except through hand-waving away complex systems then, you know. Zzzzz.

User avatar
dyqik
Light of Blast
Posts: 4323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by dyqik » Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:37 pm

temptar wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 2:25 pm
Crypto is a libertarian's wet dream. Objective is to get government out of transactions. I am not all that convinced of proof of stake being anything other than the rich to stay rich either. Currently, thecryprosdont work a whole lot as form of payments and the focus tends to be on asset value rather than payment utility.
The problem with this, of course, is that transfer of currency is only one side of any transaction. The other side usually isn't handled by crypto, and is eventually only enforceable via either personal use of physical force, which governments tend to frown on, or government threats of physical force.

Which is why governments maintain a monopoly on the use of force.

User avatar
dyqik
Light of Blast
Posts: 4323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: NFTs

Post by dyqik » Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:44 pm

Bird on a Fire wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 1:26 pm
plodder wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:43 pm
Bird on a Fire wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:13 pm


Crypto is obviously pure self-perpetuating consumption, whereas a modern capitalist economy might be only half that. How do cumulative emissions stack up?

I should split this, eh?
sorry, what?

Crypto is just a currency. Printing dollars and typing numbers on a spreadsheet hardly uses any energy. Mining crypto for the same thing uses loads.

Not heard of these new energy efficient ones.
But why do people want dollars? If you set up ploddercoins, even if the quality of printing and minting and data-entry were equal or higher you'd struggle to get anyone using them.

It's because dollars are backed by the US economy, and fossil fuel extraction in general (petrodollars). Belief pays a part, but that belief rests on tangible activity.
And the fundamental reason dollars "are backed by the US economy" is that US courts regard the transfer of dollars as sufficient to discharge payments mandated by US courts. That is, US courts are bound to accept the transfer of US dollars as discharging fines and debts.

If you are sued for not paying your employee their due wages, then showing the court a piece of paper that says you transferred 1000 ploddercoins to them is not going to prevent a judgment against you unless they agree to accept ploddercoins in lieu of dollars. And writing another piece of paper that you are paying your court mandated damages by transferring 10000 ploddercoins will likely see you eventually charged with contempt and given a jail sentence.
Last edited by dyqik on Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

plodder
After Pie
Posts: 2011
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:50 pm

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by plodder » Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:46 pm

and that's because government violence is bad, m'kay?

</LibTard>

User avatar
dyqik
Light of Blast
Posts: 4323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by dyqik » Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:51 pm

plodder wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:46 pm
and that's because government violence is bad, m'kay?

</LibTard>
That depends on if you prefer organized, predictable violence where you can minimize your risk, or random violence, where you can't.

"...if you were going to have crime, it at least should be organised crime."

sheldrake
Dorkwood
Posts: 1394
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:48 am

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by sheldrake » Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:52 pm

The goal of crypto isn't to get the government out of payments, it's to get traditional banks out of the way.

Crypto exchanges can be regulated just like anything else. Blockchains like Bitcoin actually make your transactions less secret, not more, because they're published on the blockchain and anybody who knows your wallet ID can see which other wallets you've done transactions with, how many bitcoins were involved and which way they went.

ZCash adds more privacy but still provides inspection capability to governments. Monero aims for true libtard secrecy but exchanges that deal in it are the ones who get blocked and banned by regulators.

noggins
Fuzzable
Posts: 262
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:30 pm

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by noggins » Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:53 pm

I dont get the benefit of crypto to me.

If its a scam, best case I have a laugh, worst case it pulls down the real economy.

If it works, a bunch of already relatively privileged w.nkers have just printed themselves some money, which will decrease the value of my real currency holdings.

sheldrake
Dorkwood
Posts: 1394
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:48 am

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by sheldrake » Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:54 pm

temptar wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 2:25 pm
Point is that it makes bitcoin by definition deflationary
Some people want that for the same reason they want commodities like Gold. Restricted supply is a feature for them.
Plus bitcoin is one of the least energy efficient crypto
Quite so, but that's orthogonal to its fixed supply.

User avatar
dyqik
Light of Blast
Posts: 4323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by dyqik » Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:56 pm

noggins wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:53 pm
I dont get the benefit of crypto to me.

If its a scam, best case I have a laugh, worst case it pulls down the real economy.

If it works, a bunch of already relatively privileged w.nkers have just printed themselves some money, which will decrease the value of my real currency holdings.
I really can't see that it does anything that a GPG signature doesn't.

sheldrake
Dorkwood
Posts: 1394
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:48 am

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by sheldrake » Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:59 pm

noggins wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:53 pm
If it works, a bunch of already relatively privileged w.nkers have just printed themselves some money, which will decrease the value of my real currency holdings.
It will cost you less to send money overseas. If you own some, then you would be one of the privileged people, if it works.

User avatar
bjn
Dorkwood
Posts: 1466
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:58 pm

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by bjn » Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:09 pm

dyqik wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:56 pm
noggins wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:53 pm
I dont get the benefit of crypto to me.

If its a scam, best case I have a laugh, worst case it pulls down the real economy.

If it works, a bunch of already relatively privileged w.nkers have just printed themselves some money, which will decrease the value of my real currency holdings.
I really can't see that it does anything that a GPG signature doesn't.
^^^^This.

sheldrake
Dorkwood
Posts: 1394
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:48 am

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by sheldrake » Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:11 pm

GPG signatures don't let you run a distributed ledger on their own.

User avatar
dyqik
Light of Blast
Posts: 4323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: NFTs

Post by dyqik » Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:24 pm

dyqik wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:44 pm
Bird on a Fire wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 1:26 pm
plodder wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:43 pm


sorry, what?

Crypto is just a currency. Printing dollars and typing numbers on a spreadsheet hardly uses any energy. Mining crypto for the same thing uses loads.

Not heard of these new energy efficient ones.
But why do people want dollars? If you set up ploddercoins, even if the quality of printing and minting and data-entry were equal or higher you'd struggle to get anyone using them.

It's because dollars are backed by the US economy, and fossil fuel extraction in general (petrodollars). Belief pays a part, but that belief rests on tangible activity.
And the fundamental reason dollars "are backed by the US economy" is that US courts regard the transfer of dollars as sufficient to discharge payments mandated by US courts. That is, US courts are bound to accept the transfer of US dollars as discharging fines and debts.

If you are sued for not paying your employee their due wages, then showing the court a piece of paper that says you transferred 1000 ploddercoins to them is not going to prevent a judgment against you unless they agree to accept ploddercoins in lieu of dollars. And writing another piece of paper that you are paying your court mandated damages by transferring 10000 ploddercoins will likely see you eventually charged with contempt and given a jail sentence.
BTW, I think we should point out that ploddercoin is a plodzi scheme.

noggins
Fuzzable
Posts: 262
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:30 pm

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by noggins » Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:56 pm

“ Lloyds Bank charge a flat fee of £9.50 for international transfers, ”.

sheldrake
Dorkwood
Posts: 1394
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:48 am

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by sheldrake » Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:59 pm

noggins wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:56 pm
“ Lloyds Bank charge a flat fee of £9.50 for international transfers, ”.
What does the receiving party charge, and what are the currency conversion fees like, etc..?

Large companies like Stripe use cryptos to move money internationally between their own subsidiaries to avoid the banking charges.

Millennie Al
Dorkwood
Posts: 1002
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:02 am

Re: NFTs

Post by Millennie Al » Sat Oct 09, 2021 1:48 am

sheldrake wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:07 pm
Bird on a Fire wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:02 pm
Where does crypto's value come from?
Belief. In that respect it's not that different from fiat money, except that fiat money has some inbuilt demand because you have to pay your taxes with it.
True apart from the bit about taxes. You do not have to pay UK taxes in Sterling, and I suspect that in many countries a court would take a very dim view of the tax authority refusing payment in major internationally traded currencies.
Covid-19 - Don't catch it: don't spread it.

Millennie Al
Dorkwood
Posts: 1002
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:02 am

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by Millennie Al » Sat Oct 09, 2021 1:52 am

bjn wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:11 pm
Imagine if every time you purchased something with your debit card it consumed 383kWh, that's the comparison you need to be making.
This bit is worth re-stating in a different way, which might make it more obvious how bad it is. In the UK you typically pay a bit over 10p/kWh for your domestic electricity. Imagine if every debit card transaction charged you a transaction fee of £38.30. That's Bitcoin.
Covid-19 - Don't catch it: don't spread it.

Millennie Al
Dorkwood
Posts: 1002
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:02 am

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by Millennie Al » Sat Oct 09, 2021 1:57 am

dyqik wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:37 pm
transfer of currency is only one side of any transaction. The other side usually isn't handled by crypto, and is eventually only enforceable via either personal use of physical force, which governments tend to frown on, or government threats of physical force.
Force is not required for many transactions. Imagine you go into a coffee shop every day and order the same coffee. The shop requires you to pay in advance, but there is no legal or other way for you to ensure you get your coffee. You can still safely trade with this shop because if they do not give you coffee after you have paid, you would simply stop visiting. Your future custom is worth far more than the price of one coffee. It's when transactions are for large amount and independent that you need enforcement. It's a bit like prisoners' dilemma.
Covid-19 - Don't catch it: don't spread it.

User avatar
dyqik
Light of Blast
Posts: 4323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Carbon intensity of crypto vs traditional currencies

Post by dyqik » Sat Oct 09, 2021 2:13 am

Millennie Al wrote:
Sat Oct 09, 2021 1:57 am
dyqik wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:37 pm
transfer of currency is only one side of any transaction. The other side usually isn't handled by crypto, and is eventually only enforceable via either personal use of physical force, which governments tend to frown on, or government threats of physical force.
Force is not required for many transactions. Imagine you go into a coffee shop every day and order the same coffee. The shop requires you to pay in advance, but there is no legal or other way for you to ensure you get your coffee. You can still safely trade with this shop because if they do not give you coffee after you have paid, you would simply stop visiting. Your future custom is worth far more than the price of one coffee. It's when transactions are for large amount and independent that you need enforcement. It's a bit like prisoners' dilemma.
Obviously it's not worth the cost of small claims court for a coffee. But then as you point out above, it's also not worth a crypto transaction either.

Post Reply