sh.t in Rivers

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Post Reply
IvanV
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2742
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 11:12 am

Re: sh.t in Rivers

Post by IvanV » Thu Apr 04, 2024 7:52 pm

jimbob wrote:
Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:01 pm
I would suggest that East Coast Mainline is probably a better counterexample and model than bailing out the banks.
ECML earns a large profit. They went bankrupt over bidding too much to government to access that profit. When you take it over, without having to pay those large premiums to government, suddenly you have a very profitable business again. But the government no longer has the sums the companies bid to run it.

It's just arithmetic, not success. The arithmetic is very different with a water company.

User avatar
tenchboy
After Pie
Posts: 1915
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:18 pm
Location: Down amongst the potamogeton.

Re: sh.t in Rivers

Post by tenchboy » Thu May 09, 2024 11:41 am

I'm sorry I didn't get far with this one
England river clean-up effort ‘poor’, says watchdog [BBC]
Because when I got to...
A government spokesperson said this government had done "more than any other" to restore waterways.
I couldn't think of anything other than, "but how many years have you been in control now? This is your fault and no-one elses"; and turned the page.
I readily admit, not having read the complete article, that I may be rushing to judgment but my prejudice comforts me.
If you want me Steve, just Snapchat me yeah? You know how to Snapchap me doncha Steve? You just...

Post Reply