2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Post Reply
plodder
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:50 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by plodder » Wed Feb 09, 2022 4:49 pm

Is that a party that Boris claimed was virtual?

f.cking lol.

User avatar
jdc
Hilda Ogden
Posts: 1928
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:31 pm
Location: Your Mum

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by jdc » Wed Feb 09, 2022 6:28 pm

Trinucleus wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 3:13 pm
jimbob wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 2:43 pm
tom p wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:42 pm

Very, very much so
Yup.

The guy obviously has a massive and fragile ego.

He couldn't help telling a needless ego-boosting lie about having predicted a Coronavirus pandemic when telling an implausible story about his trip to Barnard Castle
I can also see him, even when things are going well, collecting incriminating stuff 'just in case'
Who'd have thought that the man described as a "career psychopath" by Cameron* would turn out to be such an awkward ex-employee?

*Spoiler:

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5334
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by jimbob » Wed Feb 09, 2022 6:43 pm

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/bori ... 81697.html

Looks like the new party on 15th December is now going to be investigated by police
The development suggests the latest image to surface was not among more than 300 passed to officers by the Whitehall investigation, and adds to the pressure on Mr Johnson after major Tory donor John Armitage suggested his leadership is past the point of no return.
It WAS the virtual quiz apparently, Plodder.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
Stranger Mouse
After Pie
Posts: 2423
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Stranger Mouse » Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:41 pm

Now they’ve given everyone plenty of time to get their stories straight they will start sending questionnaires to 50 people. No rush then. https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status ... 80448?s=21
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works

Millennie Al
After Pie
Posts: 1621
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:02 am

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Millennie Al » Thu Feb 10, 2022 2:07 am

Stranger Mouse wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:41 pm
Now they’ve given everyone plenty of time to get their stories straight they will start sending questionnaires to 50 people. No rush then. https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status ... 80448?s=21
Maybe it's all part if a cunning plan. They get all the replies, cross check everything, then compare the stories against other evidence, and they can not only charge people with breaking the covid laws, but also get them for conspiracy to pervert the course of justoce for those whose stories all contain the same lies. Are they that Cummings cunning?

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7144
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Woodchopper » Thu Feb 10, 2022 6:06 am

Stranger Mouse wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:41 pm
Now they’ve given everyone plenty of time to get their stories straight they will start sending questionnaires to 50 people. No rush then. https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status ... 80448?s=21
There’s hundreds of photos of the parties. So there isn’t much point lying about whether someone was there. Though they might try it.

User avatar
Stranger Mouse
After Pie
Posts: 2423
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Stranger Mouse » Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:03 am

Woodchopper wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 6:06 am
Stranger Mouse wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:41 pm
Now they’ve given everyone plenty of time to get their stories straight they will start sending questionnaires to 50 people. No rush then. https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status ... 80448?s=21
There’s hundreds of photos of the parties. So there isn’t much point lying about whether someone was there. Though they might try it.
But they can come up with reasons for why they were there. “I was discussing how we were going to spend the Brexit bonus £350 million in the NHS with Tarquin and Oliver but can’t say what the other people were doing”

I can see”reasonable excuse “ being stretched quite a lot.
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works

plodder
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:50 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by plodder » Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:06 am

jimbob wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 6:43 pm
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/bori ... 81697.html

Looks like the new party on 15th December is now going to be investigated by police
The development suggests the latest image to surface was not among more than 300 passed to officers by the Whitehall investigation, and adds to the pressure on Mr Johnson after major Tory donor John Armitage suggested his leadership is past the point of no return.
It WAS the virtual quiz apparently, Plodder.
Maybe they got virtual and literal muddled up, that's an honest mistake.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7144
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Woodchopper » Thu Feb 10, 2022 11:40 am

Stranger Mouse wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:03 am
Woodchopper wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 6:06 am
Stranger Mouse wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:41 pm
Now they’ve given everyone plenty of time to get their stories straight they will start sending questionnaires to 50 people. No rush then. https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status ... 80448?s=21
There’s hundreds of photos of the parties. So there isn’t much point lying about whether someone was there. Though they might try it.
But they can come up with reasons for why they were there. “I was discussing how we were going to spend the Brexit bonus £350 million in the NHS with Tarquin and Oliver but can’t say what the other people were doing”

I can see”reasonable excuse “ being stretched quite a lot.
Yes, though might not cut it if they are photographed wearing tinsel and swigging prosecco from the bottle.

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5972
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by lpm » Thu Feb 10, 2022 12:10 pm

The outcome will be Tarquin claiming it was a necessary work meeting to discuss the £350 million to the NHS, while Oliver answers it was obviously-a-party-we-all-got-pissed-and-Tarquin-photocopied-his-arse. Then Oliver gets the fine and Tarquin is let off.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

IvanV
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2767
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 11:12 am

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by IvanV » Thu Feb 10, 2022 1:47 pm

Posted in error

User avatar
Stranger Mouse
After Pie
Posts: 2423
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Stranger Mouse » Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:04 pm

Cressida Dick’s gone
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5334
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by jimbob » Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:07 pm

IvanV wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 1:47 pm
Posted in error
The letters from the Met?
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
jdc
Hilda Ogden
Posts: 1928
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:31 pm
Location: Your Mum

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by jdc » Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:23 pm

Stranger Mouse wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:04 pm
Cressida Dick’s gone
I'm way behind - I hadn't even seen this lunchtime's news about her definitely not resigning.

That resolve didn't last long then...

monkey
After Pie
Posts: 1912
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by monkey » Thu Feb 10, 2022 8:18 pm

jdc wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:23 pm
Stranger Mouse wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:04 pm
Cressida Dick’s gone
I'm way behind - I hadn't even seen this lunchtime's news about her definitely not resigning.

That resolve didn't last long then...
I only had about 10 mins between reading 'not resigning' and my phone going 'bing' with her resignation.

User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 5272
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Gfamily » Thu Feb 10, 2022 8:25 pm

As we took some rubbish to the tip the radio was "will not resign"
it's almost poetic that as we drove home she'd gone.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

User avatar
Little waster
After Pie
Posts: 2385
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Little waster » Thu Feb 10, 2022 8:59 pm

If you were facing resigning in disgrace you'd think you'd go "You know what, my reputation is in shreds I might as well salvage something by nailing that f.cking priapic blancmange to the wall before I go!".

It is not as if there's going to be much opportunity for career advancement for her now.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.

User avatar
Trinucleus
Dorkwood
Posts: 997
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Trinucleus » Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:08 pm

I read that her contract was extended because they couldn't find anyone - in the Met - capable of taking over. Maybe know they'll take the radical step of advertising the post publicly. That may be surprisingly effective at getting someone to change the internal culture

User avatar
Stranger Mouse
After Pie
Posts: 2423
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Stranger Mouse » Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:16 pm

Little waster wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 8:59 pm
If you were facing resigning in disgrace you'd think you'd go "You know what, my reputation is in shreds I might as well salvage something by nailing that f.cking priapic blancmange to the wall before I go!".

It is not as if there's going to be much opportunity for career advancement for her now.
She’s Oxford Balliol like Alex De Pfeffel (separated by around 18 months) so that was unlikely.
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5334
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by jimbob » Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:24 pm

Little waster wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 8:59 pm
If you were facing resigning in disgrace you'd think you'd go "You know what, my reputation is in shreds I might as well salvage something by nailing that f.cking priapic blancmange to the wall before I go!".

It is not as if there's going to be much opportunity for career advancement for her now.
Why not?

Given how she's failed upwards I half expect her to end up as a peer and Home Secretary.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

Millennie Al
After Pie
Posts: 1621
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:02 am

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Millennie Al » Fri Feb 11, 2022 12:28 am

Woodchopper wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 11:40 am
Stranger Mouse wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:03 am
I can see”reasonable excuse “ being stretched quite a lot.
Yes, though might not cut it if they are photographed wearing tinsel and swigging prosecco from the bottle.
That's easily covered. They can claim that they're a Russian spy gathering blackmail material on members of government so, despite appearances, for them it was purely a work meeting.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7144
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Woodchopper » Fri Feb 11, 2022 6:01 am

Millennie Al wrote:
Fri Feb 11, 2022 12:28 am
Woodchopper wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 11:40 am
Stranger Mouse wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:03 am
I can see”reasonable excuse “ being stretched quite a lot.
Yes, though might not cut it if they are photographed wearing tinsel and swigging prosecco from the bottle.
That's easily covered. They can claim that they're a Russian spy gathering blackmail material on members of government so, despite appearances, for them it was purely a work meeting.
That would be a fine example of solving one problem by creating a bigger one.

User avatar
Little waster
After Pie
Posts: 2385
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Little waster » Fri Feb 11, 2022 9:14 am

jimbob wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:24 pm
Little waster wrote:
Thu Feb 10, 2022 8:59 pm
If you were facing resigning in disgrace you'd think you'd go "You know what, my reputation is in shreds I might as well salvage something by nailing that f.cking priapic blancmange to the wall before I go!".

It is not as if there's going to be much opportunity for career advancement for her now.
Why not?

Given how she's failed upwards I half expect her to end up as a peer and Home Secretary.
A peerage is about the only gong she hasn't collected yet but I imagine, even for this tin-eared shower of shite, giving her a Life Peerage for "Services to Corruption" would be a little too on-the-nose. Worse optics than a pub ran by Mormons.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.

User avatar
TopBadger
Catbabel
Posts: 794
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:33 pm
Location: Halfway up

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by TopBadger » Fri Feb 11, 2022 9:33 am

Is anyone else thinking this is highly interesting timing, what with a Met investigation of No 10 ongoing?
You can't polish a turd...
unless its Lion or Osterich poo... http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbus ... -turd.html

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5334
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by jimbob » Fri Feb 11, 2022 9:42 am

TopBadger wrote:
Fri Feb 11, 2022 9:33 am
Is anyone else thinking this is highly interesting timing, what with a Met investigation of No 10 ongoing?
In this case, not particularly.

Sadiq Khan just showed his power - and he's no friend of Johnson.

The Home Secretary etc thought Dick was staying, but Khan said that Dick's plan for changing the culture was too slow - he'd given her a warning, and saw her response, which was inadequate, so he told her he no longer had confidence in her.

Given her recent* record, that seems more than reasonable of Khan.



*And earlier
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

Post Reply