2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Is that a party that Boris claimed was virtual?
f.cking lol.
f.cking lol.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Who'd have thought that the man described as a "career psychopath" by Cameron* would turn out to be such an awkward ex-employee?Trinucleus wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 3:13 pmI can also see him, even when things are going well, collecting incriminating stuff 'just in case'
*Spoiler:
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/bori ... 81697.html
Looks like the new party on 15th December is now going to be investigated by police
Looks like the new party on 15th December is now going to be investigated by police
It WAS the virtual quiz apparently, Plodder.The development suggests the latest image to surface was not among more than 300 passed to officers by the Whitehall investigation, and adds to the pressure on Mr Johnson after major Tory donor John Armitage suggested his leadership is past the point of no return.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 2423
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Now they’ve given everyone plenty of time to get their stories straight they will start sending questionnaires to 50 people. No rush then. https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status ... 80448?s=21
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 1621
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:02 am
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Maybe it's all part if a cunning plan. They get all the replies, cross check everything, then compare the stories against other evidence, and they can not only charge people with breaking the covid laws, but also get them for conspiracy to pervert the course of justoce for those whose stories all contain the same lies. Are they that Cummings cunning?Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:41 pmNow they’ve given everyone plenty of time to get their stories straight they will start sending questionnaires to 50 people. No rush then. https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status ... 80448?s=21
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7144
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
There’s hundreds of photos of the parties. So there isn’t much point lying about whether someone was there. Though they might try it.Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:41 pmNow they’ve given everyone plenty of time to get their stories straight they will start sending questionnaires to 50 people. No rush then. https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status ... 80448?s=21
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 2423
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
But they can come up with reasons for why they were there. “I was discussing how we were going to spend the Brexit bonus £350 million in the NHS with Tarquin and Oliver but can’t say what the other people were doing”Woodchopper wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 6:06 amThere’s hundreds of photos of the parties. So there isn’t much point lying about whether someone was there. Though they might try it.Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:41 pmNow they’ve given everyone plenty of time to get their stories straight they will start sending questionnaires to 50 people. No rush then. https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status ... 80448?s=21
I can see”reasonable excuse “ being stretched quite a lot.
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Maybe they got virtual and literal muddled up, that's an honest mistake.jimbob wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 6:43 pmhttps://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/bori ... 81697.html
Looks like the new party on 15th December is now going to be investigated by police
It WAS the virtual quiz apparently, Plodder.The development suggests the latest image to surface was not among more than 300 passed to officers by the Whitehall investigation, and adds to the pressure on Mr Johnson after major Tory donor John Armitage suggested his leadership is past the point of no return.
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7144
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Yes, though might not cut it if they are photographed wearing tinsel and swigging prosecco from the bottle.Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:03 amBut they can come up with reasons for why they were there. “I was discussing how we were going to spend the Brexit bonus £350 million in the NHS with Tarquin and Oliver but can’t say what the other people were doing”Woodchopper wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 6:06 amThere’s hundreds of photos of the parties. So there isn’t much point lying about whether someone was there. Though they might try it.Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:41 pmNow they’ve given everyone plenty of time to get their stories straight they will start sending questionnaires to 50 people. No rush then. https://twitter.com/paulbranditv/status ... 80448?s=21
I can see”reasonable excuse “ being stretched quite a lot.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
The outcome will be Tarquin claiming it was a necessary work meeting to discuss the £350 million to the NHS, while Oliver answers it was obviously-a-party-we-all-got-pissed-and-Tarquin-photocopied-his-arse. Then Oliver gets the fine and Tarquin is let off.
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted in error
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 2423
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Cressida Dick’s gone
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
I'm way behind - I hadn't even seen this lunchtime's news about her definitely not resigning.
That resolve didn't last long then...
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
As we took some rubbish to the tip the radio was "will not resign"
it's almost poetic that as we drove home she'd gone.
it's almost poetic that as we drove home she'd gone.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
If you were facing resigning in disgrace you'd think you'd go "You know what, my reputation is in shreds I might as well salvage something by nailing that f.cking priapic blancmange to the wall before I go!".
It is not as if there's going to be much opportunity for career advancement for her now.
It is not as if there's going to be much opportunity for career advancement for her now.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
- Trinucleus
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 997
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
I read that her contract was extended because they couldn't find anyone - in the Met - capable of taking over. Maybe know they'll take the radical step of advertising the post publicly. That may be surprisingly effective at getting someone to change the internal culture
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 2423
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
She’s Oxford Balliol like Alex De Pfeffel (separated by around 18 months) so that was unlikely.Little waster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 8:59 pmIf you were facing resigning in disgrace you'd think you'd go "You know what, my reputation is in shreds I might as well salvage something by nailing that f.cking priapic blancmange to the wall before I go!".
It is not as if there's going to be much opportunity for career advancement for her now.
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Why not?Little waster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 8:59 pmIf you were facing resigning in disgrace you'd think you'd go "You know what, my reputation is in shreds I might as well salvage something by nailing that f.cking priapic blancmange to the wall before I go!".
It is not as if there's going to be much opportunity for career advancement for her now.
Given how she's failed upwards I half expect her to end up as a peer and Home Secretary.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 1621
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:02 am
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
That's easily covered. They can claim that they're a Russian spy gathering blackmail material on members of government so, despite appearances, for them it was purely a work meeting.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 11:40 amYes, though might not cut it if they are photographed wearing tinsel and swigging prosecco from the bottle.Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:03 amI can see”reasonable excuse “ being stretched quite a lot.
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7144
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
That would be a fine example of solving one problem by creating a bigger one.Millennie Al wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 12:28 amThat's easily covered. They can claim that they're a Russian spy gathering blackmail material on members of government so, despite appearances, for them it was purely a work meeting.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 11:40 amYes, though might not cut it if they are photographed wearing tinsel and swigging prosecco from the bottle.Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:03 amI can see”reasonable excuse “ being stretched quite a lot.
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
A peerage is about the only gong she hasn't collected yet but I imagine, even for this tin-eared shower of shite, giving her a Life Peerage for "Services to Corruption" would be a little too on-the-nose. Worse optics than a pub ran by Mormons.jimbob wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:24 pmWhy not?Little waster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 8:59 pmIf you were facing resigning in disgrace you'd think you'd go "You know what, my reputation is in shreds I might as well salvage something by nailing that f.cking priapic blancmange to the wall before I go!".
It is not as if there's going to be much opportunity for career advancement for her now.
Given how she's failed upwards I half expect her to end up as a peer and Home Secretary.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Is anyone else thinking this is highly interesting timing, what with a Met investigation of No 10 ongoing?
You can't polish a turd...
unless its Lion or Osterich poo... http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbus ... -turd.html
unless its Lion or Osterich poo... http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbus ... -turd.html
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
In this case, not particularly.
Sadiq Khan just showed his power - and he's no friend of Johnson.
The Home Secretary etc thought Dick was staying, but Khan said that Dick's plan for changing the culture was too slow - he'd given her a warning, and saw her response, which was inadequate, so he told her he no longer had confidence in her.
Given her recent* record, that seems more than reasonable of Khan.
*And earlier
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation