Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 9:48 am
Well we know that's lie for a start.
Page 36 of 41
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 9:49 am
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 10:19 am
Meanwhile Grant Schapps has stated that Johnson wasn't partying because he was mourning the death of his mother, which was nearly a year after the party.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 10:45 am
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 12:10 pm
Update.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics- ... m2=twitter
It gets worse. Anyone who objected was 'mocked'.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics- ... m2=twitter
It gets worse. Anyone who objected was 'mocked'.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 1:13 pm
Looks like he's finally pissed off even those who have been covering for him up till now. Surely he can't hang on.Tessa K wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 12:10 pmUpdate.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics- ... m2=twitter
It gets worse. Anyone who objected was 'mocked'.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 7:10 pm
Don’t bother watching the full Panorama. Everything of interest was in the twitter clip. The programme as a whole was damage limitation for Boris Johnson and the Conservatives and an opportunity to try and both sides it with the Starmer Durham thing. Jesus I know Laura K gets some unfair and probably sexist criticism but any criticism she gets from this is richly deserved. Utter crap. Utter sh.t. Infuriating. It may be responsible for the total degradation of journalism world wide for the next century. Total bollocks. Jesus that is an hour of my life I won’t get back.Opti wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 1:13 pmLooks like he's finally pissed off even those who have been covering for him up till now. Surely he can't hang on.Tessa K wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 12:10 pmUpdate.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics- ... m2=twitter
It gets worse. Anyone who objected was 'mocked'.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 7:20 pm
The false equivalence between having a bottle of Cobra in the middle of a long working night and weekly parties with large numbers of people emptying bottles of spirits was somethingStranger Mouse wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 7:10 pmDon’t bother watching the full Panorama. Everything of interest was in the twitter clip. The programme as a whole was damage limitation for Boris Johnson and the Conservatives and an opportunity to try and both sides it with the Starmer Durham thing. Jesus I know Laura K gets some unfair and probably sexist criticism but any criticism she gets from this is richly deserved. Utter crap. Utter sh.t. Infuriating. It may be responsible for the total degradation of journalism world wide for the next century. Total bollocks. Jesus that is an hour of my life I won’t get back.Opti wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 1:13 pmLooks like he's finally pissed off even those who have been covering for him up till now. Surely he can't hang on.Tessa K wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 12:10 pmUpdate.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics- ... m2=twitter
It gets worse. Anyone who objected was 'mocked'.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 7:35 pm
And as if to emphasise the difference new details/photos have emerged of a previously unreported partyjimbob wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 7:20 pmThe false equivalence between having a bottle of Cobra in the middle of a long working night and weekly parties with large numbers of people emptying bottles of spirits was somethingStranger Mouse wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 7:10 pmDon’t bother watching the full Panorama. Everything of interest was in the twitter clip. The programme as a whole was damage limitation for Boris Johnson and the Conservatives and an opportunity to try and both sides it with the Starmer Durham thing. Jesus I know Laura K gets some unfair and probably sexist criticism but any criticism she gets from this is richly deserved. Utter crap. Utter sh.t. Infuriating. It may be responsible for the total degradation of journalism world wide for the next century. Total bollocks. Jesus that is an hour of my life I won’t get back.
https://twitter.com/pippacrerar/status/ ... DTpoax5JZQ
- 9BB45C8E-D8A1-46C2-A51C-53ACB3B6D9A3.jpeg (369.53 KiB) Viewed 1500 times
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 9:16 pm
Just been reading the latest batch of revelations on the beeb. It sounds exactly as I expected, which is depressing.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 10:37 am
Enjoy the Sue Gray report - here it is - there are new photos https://twitter.com/mattuthompson/statu ... gC9frkQWVABird on a Fire wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 9:16 pmJust been reading the latest batch of revelations on the beeb. It sounds exactly as I expected, which is depressing.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 10:44 am
A failure of leadership and judgement.
Is that just Partygate or the last few years in general?
Is that just Partygate or the last few years in general?
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 10:51 am
Opinium are releasing some new new polling on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/opiniumresearch/sta ... gC9frkQWVA
In the report I note that it’s clearly stated that the late announcement of the Met criminal investigation meant that some events were not investigated properly by Sue Gray.
https://twitter.com/opiniumresearch/sta ... gC9frkQWVA
In the report I note that it’s clearly stated that the late announcement of the Met criminal investigation meant that some events were not investigated properly by Sue Gray.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 11:01 am
Jesus
- 0E87553D-9DFB-4698-86DC-45E4A4E5886D.jpeg (511.99 KiB) Viewed 1352 times
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 11:05 am
Worst bits:
- sick / "altercation" between two individuals
- "got away with it"
- karaoke machine
- "don't wave bottles of wine"
And above all:
- nobody has investigated ABBA party
- sick / "altercation" between two individuals
- "got away with it"
- karaoke machine
- "don't wave bottles of wine"
And above all:
- nobody has investigated ABBA party
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 11:21 am
Well they were all working or something
- 3282ABC5-045B-4A5D-9978-08B692C69FB1.jpeg (461.17 KiB) Viewed 1331 times
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 12:16 pm
Well TBF if I had to work in close proximity with Johnson and his ilk I'd probably start to feel nauseous and want to start punching people too.Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Wed May 25, 2022 11:21 amWell they were all working or something 3282ABC5-045B-4A5D-9978-08B692C69FB1.jpeg
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 12:21 pm
There's a certain level of baked-in insanity that we have got to the point where people are being seriously asked to look at pictures of parties and then decide whether the party is a party and which of the partying party-goers are partying at the party.Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Wed May 25, 2022 10:51 amOpinium are releasing some new new polling on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/opiniumresearch/sta ... gC9frkQWVA
In the report I note that it’s clearly stated that the late announcement of the Met criminal investigation meant that some events were not investigated properly by Sue Gray.
It's like the world's shittest Captcha*, f.ck knows what they are training the Google AI to do with this info?
*If I had the time and inclination I'd mock one up.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 12:22 pm
Actually, Johnson's birthday party looks miserable as f.ck. Like a kid's party but no kids turned up.Stranger Mouse wrote: ↑Wed May 25, 2022 10:37 amEnjoy the Sue Gray report - here it is - there are new photos https://twitter.com/mattuthompson/statu ... gC9frkQWVABird on a Fire wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 9:16 pmJust been reading the latest batch of revelations on the beeb. It sounds exactly as I expected, which is depressing.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 12:48 pm
And yet, despite that, it's a f.cking trillion times more exciting and crowded than most children's parties that year.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 1:23 pm
That's the important point, true.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 1:47 pm
I don't get why the opposition aren't picking up on the fact that it doesn't matter if it was obviously a party or not.
The test in law was whether the gathering was "reasonably necessary for work"
It's not hard to work out that getting lashed at someone's leaving do fails that test.
The test in law was whether the gathering was "reasonably necessary for work"
It's not hard to work out that getting lashed at someone's leaving do fails that test.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 1:51 pm
I can't get past the "they were working under immense pressure" clams. It was 10 Downing st, not an ICU full of Covid patients !! Tossers.
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 2:11 pm
Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 2:32 pm
Still amazed that fewer than 54 conservative MPs have a problem with this, with the minorly tin-hat caveat that conservative party internal processes aren't transparent and seem to have little regard for due process/reality. Can we actually trust reports of how many letters have been sent?