JFK assassination

[noggins]

JFK was a committed cold warrior who tripled defence spending. Any theory that has him being offed for being a pinko is utter garbage.

And any other conspiracy theory involves a) the US government covering it up , for ever, or b) a conspiracy undetectable to the entire almighty US intelligence and law enforcement systems yet quite apparent to some schlub in their moms basement.

[Herainestold]

They haven't released all of the documents that they have. They are obviously hiding something.

[JQH]

Why would they bother? Most people in the US government now weren't even born when JFK was assassinated what have they got to lose by releasing all information? What have they to gain by secrecy?

[Herainestold]

The release still leaves more than 10,000 documents either partially redacted or withheld entirely, which won't be seen until December 2022 at the earliest under an order issued by President Joe Biden in October. It has prolonged the bitter debate between the federal government and JFK researchers, who argue that the CIA, the FBI and other national security agencies have continually stonewalled a congressionally mandated release.

In October Biden delayed a scheduled release to "protect against identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in the immediate disclosure."
He set two deadlines: Wednesday, for any documents that national security agencies have not proposed be withheld, and Dec. 15, 2022, to allow for the remaining documents to undergo a rigorous security review and then be released.

Since many of the documents in question involve covert Cold War intelligence activities, there are theoretically legitimate reasons why classified information dating to the 1960s should be withheld, said former CIA officer David Priess, the author of "The President's Book of Secrets."
It is "increasingly unlikely" but "possible" that a CIA source from that era could still be alive and at risk from disclosure, Priess said.
"It could be that there's a source out there who is still in power or still connected directly to someone that would be dangerous for today's intelligence collection," Priess said. "Now, you have to balance that against the historical interest and the compelling public interest here."

They are hiding something. Maybe it is trivial. Maybe it's not.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/15/politics ... index.html

[Bird on a Fire]

Russia does have a tendency to go after old spies. Perhaps not that old, though, I dunno.

[noggins]

Why would they bother? Most people in the US government now weren't even born when JFK was assassinated what have they got to lose by releasing all information? What have they to gain by secrecy?

because they are evil capitalist swine, comrade