You get a 7 kW AC cable with the car, for slow charging in long term car parks and the like.
The fast DC charging stations all have their own cables - massive heavy things that can deliver 100 kW and up.
You get a 7 kW AC cable with the car, for slow charging in long term car parks and the like.
We have some friends who recently bought an MG 4 EV, and they got something like 13 grand off the price.
That's what I just did, also MG4 and got £11,500 off a Trophy Long Range, maybe I should have held out for more off!
Just wanted to point out that my above post is now bollocks - maybe it was right at some point in time - but it is now possible to be on Octopus Export and Octopus Go (off-peak intended for EV's) at the same time. If this was available two years ago then I missed it and otherwise would have gone for it because I have battery storage - so better to charge up the house battery overnight at 7-9p/kWh, sell the solar generation back to the grid at 15p/kWh, and pocket the difference.
Even better than Octopus Go is Octopus Intelligent Go if you have a smart meter and a compatible charger.TopBadger wrote: ↑Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:29 amJust wanted to point out that my above post is now bollocks - maybe it was right at some point in time - but it is now possible to be on Octopus Export and Octopus Go (off-peak intended for EV's) at the same time. If this was available two years ago then I missed it and otherwise would have gone for it because I have battery storage - so better to charge up the house battery overnight at 7-9p/kWh, sell the solar generation back to the grid at 15p/kWh, and pocket the difference.
Yep. But I went for a Pod Point Solo 3S - which is currently not on the supported list for Intelligent Go. Had I have known that I might have chosen something else, but then I chose the Pod Point as I got a discount on it. It may end up supported eventually.
I’ve got an Ohme ePod and had no issues. It’s very basic, externally at least. Just a socket on the wall effectively, but the clever stuff happens in the app/at Octopus
I find ABRP (A Better Route Planner) to be more robust for planning journeys with charging than zapmap or electroverse. Electroverse is nice for making it simple to charge from multiple charging networks though, even if not using it for the nav.
I'm on a looped supply, and the provider let a Zappi install go ahead (with a max power limit set) while waiting "up to 18 months" to be developedFlammableFlower wrote: ↑Tue Mar 25, 2025 2:14 pmThis is why I've yet to get a charger put in. 1) We're on a loop, so that will need dealing with first - there was already enough of a problem 10+ years ago when we had a loft conversion and started pulling more power (next-door got a smell of melting plastic whenever the kids had a shower...) and 2) our meter and consumer unitx are all in the centre of the halls-adjoining semi and it's going to be an absolute nightmare with flooring to get cabling to outside. Like you TopBadger, there is already a cable going out to the (not physically connected garage) - but I thought that wouldn't be suitable for most installers to go off.
This is a reasonable line of argument. It tends to make me think that it would be useful to have a car which it is really easy to take some/most of the batteries out, and store them for the day when you want to drive more than 60km or whatever. So you aren't driving around much of the time with a huge amount of dead weight, consuming more energy and doing more damage to the road, your tyres and your suspension. Though it is going to require a bit of ingenuity to make it practical to manage batteries perhaps in the quantity of several hundred kg.nekomatic wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 2:49 pmWiring regs say that you should have a dedicated circuit for any load that regularly draws high power for an extended period, and of course you need a proper charger if you want to use a smart charging tariff, but aside from that I'm not convinced most people need a 7kW home charger for their electric cars. If you get roughly 3 miles range per kWh of charging then six hours from a normal socket should give you 40+ miles, which I'm sure is further than most people drive their cars most days.
Rule of thumb (an old site, but it's the one that sticks in my head) seems to be that charging no further than c. 80% of nominal capacity largely avoids capacity-reducing damage. So you would lose 20% of nominal range by doing that, or maybe 25% of actual range if you don't want to drop below 20% capacity. But that only really affects unexpected long journeys that are between 60% and 80% of your car's range, because any longer than that and you'd need a charging stop anyway. And the car can control its own charging, so it doesn't need to be more complicated than a menu setting that's either 'preserve my battery health' or 'give me maximum range tomorrow morning'. Although there's no limit on how difficult car UI designers can make it to access such a setting.IvanV wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 3:07 pmThough I think it is not actually very good for batteries to be kept nearly full most of the time. If you are to "smart charge" in the sense of managing your batteries to maximise life, then it becomes more complicated than just topping up the amount you travelled today. Some charging software is capable of taking such issues in to account, though you also have to communicate more with it about your plans.
And then there is the issue that a full battery gives you the option of driving a larger distance, without making time for an expensive fast charge, and without having to predict it some days in advance. We don't have to worry about such issues with liquid fuel.
…
So, it's all a bit complicated really. And most people don't want that complication.
I assisted with a research project on V2G last year, a desk-study snap-shot of where we are up to with it. One of the main impediments to straightforward take-up is a bunch of bureaucratic rules and approvals which are up to the government to simplify if it wants this to happen at any material scale.
It might well be enough for most, and you may be able to get a time of use tariff and use the car to dictate the timings. You won’t be able to use a smart tariff though. Personally my commute is about 50 miles per day so I’m happier with a 7kW charger. Also a long trip doesn’t require quite as much planning if you can get a full charge overnight.nekomatic wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 2:49 pmWiring regs say that you should have a dedicated circuit for any load that regularly draws high power for an extended period, and of course you need a proper charger if you want to use a smart charging tariff, but aside from that I'm not convinced most people need a 7kW home charger for their electric cars. If you get roughly 3 miles range per kWh of charging then six hours from a normal socket should give you 40+ miles, which I'm sure is further than most people drive their cars most days.
Dangerous. Normal sockets overheat if used continually for 6 hours at 2kW. Dedicated home chargers are essessential to avoid house fires and electrocutions. Fortunately installing home chargers has a payback of just a few months due to smart tariffs.nekomatic wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 2:49 pmWiring regs say that you should have a dedicated circuit for any load that regularly draws high power for an extended period, and of course you need a proper charger if you want to use a smart charging tariff, but aside from that I'm not convinced most people need a 7kW home charger for their electric cars. If you get roughly 3 miles range per kWh of charging then six hours from a normal socket should give you 40+ miles, which I'm sure is further than most people drive their cars most days.
What a glorious understatement! "A bit of ingenuity". Taking out half the batteries would require moving 160kg.IvanV wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 3:07 pmThis is a reasonable line of argument. It tends to make me think that it would be useful to have a car which it is really easy to take some/most of the batteries out, and store them for the day when you want to drive more than 60km or whatever. So you aren't driving around much of the time with a huge amount of dead weight, consuming more energy and doing more damage to the road, your tyres and your suspension. Though it is going to require a bit of ingenuity to make it practical to manage batteries perhaps in the quantity of several hundred kg.
Only 'so cheap' if you can park on your drive or similar.lpm wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 5:23 pmWhat a glorious understatement! "A bit of ingenuity". Taking out half the batteries would require moving 160kg.
Reality is that any inefficiency of EVs is irrelevant to most people - it is so cheap to run nobody cares. Shifting out 160 kg of batteries would save in the region of 14p per hundred miles.
So the energy saving is nugatory. You are right, no one will bother about that. Maybe the increased car maintenance costs also prove to be small.lpm wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 5:23 pmWhat a glorious understatement! "A bit of ingenuity". Taking out half the batteries would require moving 160kg.IvanV wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 3:07 pmThis is a reasonable line of argument. It tends to make me think that it would be useful to have a car which it is really easy to take some/most of the batteries out, and store them for the day when you want to drive more than 60km or whatever. So you aren't driving around much of the time with a huge amount of dead weight, consuming more energy and doing more damage to the road, your tyres and your suspension. Though it is going to require a bit of ingenuity to make it practical to manage batteries perhaps in the quantity of several hundred kg.
Reality is that any inefficiency of EVs is irrelevant to most people - it is so cheap to run nobody cares. Shifting out 160 kg of batteries would save in the region of 14p per hundred miles.