Re: The Invasion of Ukraine
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2022 6:23 pm
Never have I seen a clearer example of a power play by a politician.
Apparently it's revenge for Putin playing the same, much longer trick with Erdoğan in front of the Russian press. To the point Erdoğan sat down thinking he was in for a long wait and then Putin walked in. He's famous for it - made Angela Merkel wait 4 hours... so it's somewhat good to see him on the receiving end.
https://jacobin.com/2022/07/ukraine-rus ... resistanceI’m a Ukrainian Socialist. Here’s Why I Resist the Russian Invasion.
It took them, what, five months to actually run an article by a Ukrainian?Woodchopper wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 1:55 pmA good article. Pity that it still needs to be written.
https://jacobin.com/2022/07/ukraine-rus ... resistanceI’m a Ukrainian Socialist. Here’s Why I Resist the Russian Invasion.
Agree with the content or not, a quick search on their website suggests that is not the case.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 2:17 pmIt took them, what, five months to actually run an article by a Ukrainian?Woodchopper wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 1:55 pmA good article. Pity that it still needs to be written.
https://jacobin.com/2022/07/ukraine-rus ... resistanceI’m a Ukrainian Socialist. Here’s Why I Resist the Russian Invasion.
You are right. A quick search found a couple of articles either by or partly by Ukrainians, though they lose points for one of them being an interview by Branko Marcetic, whose own articles are paranoid b.llsh.t containing extensive amounts of straight, uncut Kremlin propaganda. They gave that pustulent imbecile rather more articles than all Ukrainians combined so far, as far as I can tell by searching the subject "Ukraine", but I couldn't check the tag itself as apparently that's for subscribers only and the thought of contributing so much as a penny to that pathetic posturing shitrag turns my stomach.monkey wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 2:34 pmAgree with the content or not, a quick search on their website suggests that is not the case.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 2:17 pmIt took them, what, five months to actually run an article by a Ukrainian?Woodchopper wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 1:55 pmA good article. Pity that it still needs to be written.
https://jacobin.com/2022/07/ukraine-rus ... resistance
The Russian embassy in the UK has given the lie to thatEACLucifer wrote: ↑Fri Jul 29, 2022 7:30 pmThe bastards also appear to have murdered several dozen Ukrainian prisoners of war in what, given the location and given the fact that the M31 fragments used to "prove" that Ukraine did it were also photographed in relation to a totally different strike.
1) M31 rockets are in short suppy, and a very accurate, and have only been used so far on high value military targets. A strike on a prisoner of war camp holding Ukrainian prisoners isn't going to be approved. The camp was not near anything else at all.
2) There's chatter on the Russian side indicating that at least some of them think it was their side that did it.
3) Though there's no evidence for it being a Ukrainian strike and some of the "evidence" supplied was clearly fabricated, keeping prisoners of war near the frontlines is a war crime in of itself.
I'm very weary of this. Atrocity after atrocity. They hit a bus queue, too. Civilians killed walking their dogs. Anyone whose end goal doesn't involve the khuilo in chief decorating a lamppost is insufficiently committed at this point.
They were gleefully calling for POWs from Azov to be killed, claiming they deserved "a humilitating death"
https://twitter.com/RussianEmbassy/stat ... 7712162828#Azov militants deserve execution, but death not by firing squad but by hanging, because they’re not real soldiers. They deserve a humiliating death.
I can't write about the occupants of that Russian embassy what I would like to write, not here or anywhere else. Suffice to say that they clearly aren't diplomats from their behaviour, which means we should withdraw the protection of the Vienna convention from them. We should return these occupants from the embassy to Russia, and to show our generosity, we should use several aircraft for each individual.Sciolus wrote: ↑Sat Jul 30, 2022 11:25 amhttps://twitter.com/RussianEmbassy/stat ... 7712162828Russian incitement/gloating cut
I understand why you don't like the quote being repeated, but FWIW I got it from the BBC website's most-read article, so in general that ship has sailed.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sat Jul 30, 2022 8:20 pmSciolus wrote: ↑Sat Jul 30, 2022 11:25 amhttps://twitter.com/RussianEmbassy/stat ... 7712162828Russian incitement/gloating cut
I didn't mind you posting it, I just didn't want to post it a second time as once was enough to inform people what they said.Sciolus wrote: ↑Sat Jul 30, 2022 8:56 pmI understand why you don't like the quote being repeated, but FWIW I got it from the BBC website's most-read article, so in general that ship has sailed.
I realise this reads more alarmingly than I intended it to. I think China's making threats, not about to invade, but there's a few details - like large Ro-Ro ferries being moved off their normal routes - that make it look perhaps like an exercise with the intent of working out how to mobilise for the real thing.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 31, 2022 12:28 pmI don't want to get too ahead of it in terms of concern, but there's quite a lot of Chinese equipment heading coastwards at the moment.
Evergreen Intel (@vcdgf555 on twitter) is a good starting point. General chatter mainly.