Beatty it is. You've got me bang to rights, guvnor.Allo V Psycho wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 11:55 amBeattieski, shirley? As opposed to him saying "there seems to be something wrong with my bl..dy leadership today" or "there seems to be something wrong with my bl..dy leadership this year".sTeamTraen wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 10:49 pm"There seems to be something wrong with our bl..dy ships this year" - Admiral Jelicovitch (probably).
Blyatskrieg
- sTeamTraen
- After Pie
- Posts: 2558
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
- Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Re: Blyatskrieg
Something something hammer something something nail
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7144
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: Blyatskrieg
Here’s a summary of what’s known: https://twitter.com/thatkhersch/status/ ... Hc2xe2hghQEACLucifer wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 8:24 pmIt's looking that way - people are doing a pretty good job of tracking Russian ships in and out of Sevastopol an Novorossiysk, so barring sudden evidence of sinking/damage, it'll be a matter of waiting for a Grigorovich class to turn up.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 8:10 pmUS government has no information on the Makarov. Looks like it probably wasn’t sunk then. https://twitter.com/jackdetsch/status/1 ... Xuu-OSU4bA
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Blyatskrieg
The video mentioned in that thread is almost certainly fake - we can tell it's meant to be normal speed, as the radar is rotating at normal speed, but the viewpoint moves quite a lot. The observing aircraft would have to be almost on top of the ship for the angle to change that much, yet the view is very hazy and appears to be distant - and Bayraktars' cameras are remarkably clear at a hundred kilometres or more. Depending on the range it was supposedly taken at, the aircraft filming would have been travelling somewhere between a minimum of several times as fast as a Bayraktar can go at a full clip to a maximum of several times how fast an SR-71, fastest reconnaissance aircraft ever, can go at full clip in order to produce the angular change.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Sat May 07, 2022 4:40 amHere’s a summary of what’s known: https://twitter.com/thatkhersch/status/ ... Hc2xe2hghQEACLucifer wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 8:24 pmIt's looking that way - people are doing a pretty good job of tracking Russian ships in and out of Sevastopol an Novorossiysk, so barring sudden evidence of sinking/damage, it'll be a matter of waiting for a Grigorovich class to turn up.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 8:10 pmUS government has no information on the Makarov. Looks like it probably wasn’t sunk then. https://twitter.com/jackdetsch/status/1 ... Xuu-OSU4bA
Fakes don't prove it didn't happen - they emerged with Moskva, too - but they certainly don't prove it did.
I will note that a good number of the techniques that haven't picked up Makarov also didn't pick up Moskva. Tools like FIRMS are very powerful, but they are not perfect. Nor would one expect a sunken ship to appear on SAR.
At the moment, there's no evidence pointing to a successful attack, and comments from the US suggest that we ought to have seen something by now. Arestovych's comments are interesting on this one. It could be that Ukraine did attack a Grigorovich class, but either failed to hit, or failed to inflict meaningful damage.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Blyatskrieg
The Ukrainian counterattack in Kharkiv Oblast continues, and appears to be successful so far. I've previously mentioned the Russian invaders were driven out of Staryi Saltiv - it appears that Ukrainian troops came up from the south along the Seversky Donets, then subsequently cleared the main east west road from Kharkiv to Staryi Saltiv. Now they are advancing north towards the Russian border. It's not yet clear how far they've got, but there's rumours the Russians have had to abandon ground to avoid encirclement, as happened at Kyiv and Trostyanets. The advance may have got as far as Lyptsi, which is less than 10km from the border. As there is little of significance between this point and the Russian border, they may choose to dig in at this point and divert their offensive efforts elsewhere. Alternatively, they could choose to keep pushing and drive the Russians back over the border everywhere west of the Seversky Donets, which would also bring the staging areas around Belgorod and the supply lines through Vovchans'k comfortably into artillery range. They have already driven the Russians far enough back to get them out of the range of most artillery from Kharkiv.
In addition, Ukrainian forces are counterattacking further south, shelling Russian forces just west of Izium, north of the Seversky Donets, which runs west to east at this point. The Russian position here is vulnerable, as they do not hold a very wide area west of the Oskil river, which is dammed just east of Izium, with a large reservoir north of that point that splits the Russian supply routes into two parts. The railways and best roads run north-south on the western side of the Oskil and its reservoir. The Russians have crossed the Seversky Donets at Izium in order to push south in the direction of Barvinkove. Those advancing forces are vulnerable if Izium is threatened.
It's important to remember supply lines are not an all or nothing thing. If you are trying to ferry stuff in a car between Leeds and Manchester, and the M62 is closed, it doesn't block the route, but it will take longer, and that will mean fewer trips and fewer car loads per day. If the A58 and the A672 are closed too, it slows things down further, and so on. The same is true of military supply lines. If the Ukrainians were just to use artillery to crater the roads that run through Izium, it would slow the movement of supply trucks. If they did the same to the railway, it could certainly be repaired, but it would delay operations, and reduce the supplies reaching Izium, and thus those reaching the frontline south of the Donets.
To maintain their slow, grinding advance, the Russians need enormous amounts of artillery ammunition, as it is their principle advantage, and the key to their advance. To successfully use artillery to enable advances, they need to achieve sufficient concentration of firepower in space and time. If their supply of shells is slowed, they can either achieve this less often, or in fewer places, and they have to maintain a certain pace of advance or they are in very serious trouble. The Russian forces in Ukraine have repeatedly showed they are poor at defending, probably due to poor morale and significant lack of infantry. If they cannot maintain the firepower pressure needed to advance - which is dependent on a long supply line from the north - they could find themselves driven back as they were from Kyiv and Chernihiv and Sumy.
In addition, Ukrainian forces are counterattacking further south, shelling Russian forces just west of Izium, north of the Seversky Donets, which runs west to east at this point. The Russian position here is vulnerable, as they do not hold a very wide area west of the Oskil river, which is dammed just east of Izium, with a large reservoir north of that point that splits the Russian supply routes into two parts. The railways and best roads run north-south on the western side of the Oskil and its reservoir. The Russians have crossed the Seversky Donets at Izium in order to push south in the direction of Barvinkove. Those advancing forces are vulnerable if Izium is threatened.
It's important to remember supply lines are not an all or nothing thing. If you are trying to ferry stuff in a car between Leeds and Manchester, and the M62 is closed, it doesn't block the route, but it will take longer, and that will mean fewer trips and fewer car loads per day. If the A58 and the A672 are closed too, it slows things down further, and so on. The same is true of military supply lines. If the Ukrainians were just to use artillery to crater the roads that run through Izium, it would slow the movement of supply trucks. If they did the same to the railway, it could certainly be repaired, but it would delay operations, and reduce the supplies reaching Izium, and thus those reaching the frontline south of the Donets.
To maintain their slow, grinding advance, the Russians need enormous amounts of artillery ammunition, as it is their principle advantage, and the key to their advance. To successfully use artillery to enable advances, they need to achieve sufficient concentration of firepower in space and time. If their supply of shells is slowed, they can either achieve this less often, or in fewer places, and they have to maintain a certain pace of advance or they are in very serious trouble. The Russian forces in Ukraine have repeatedly showed they are poor at defending, probably due to poor morale and significant lack of infantry. If they cannot maintain the firepower pressure needed to advance - which is dependent on a long supply line from the north - they could find themselves driven back as they were from Kyiv and Chernihiv and Sumy.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Blyatskrieg
Ground launched Brimstone already in action, it seems.
The Brimstone missile is an extremely advanced weapon, and was used by the RAF against Gaddafi and IS forces. There's been discussion of sending them for a while - mostly focussed on their potential use against landing craft - but it looks like they are already in use against land targets in the east.
The Brimstone missile is an extremely advanced weapon, and was used by the RAF against Gaddafi and IS forces. There's been discussion of sending them for a while - mostly focussed on their potential use against landing craft - but it looks like they are already in use against land targets in the east.
Re: Blyatskrieg
I think the Russian soldiers are getting to the "Run away! Run away!" stage. They know they're getting nowhere.
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Blyatskrieg
Snake Island. Sukhoi-27s
Ukrainian airforce is still active, and just bombed Russian positions with crewed aircraft.
Note the damage - these planes can carry a much heavier warload than any drone in Ukrainian service.
Ukrainian airforce is still active, and just bombed Russian positions with crewed aircraft.
Note the damage - these planes can carry a much heavier warload than any drone in Ukrainian service.
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:23 pm
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Blyatskrieg
Their positions have collapsed immediately northeast of Kharkiv.
It's pretty well documented by OSINT, which in practise means things like local reports (usually on Telegram), footage that can be geolocated by those with the right skills, and evidence of combat via things like the FIRMS fire monitoring system, that one also telling us Ukraine is contesting territory right up to the edge of the urban area of Izium.
Re: Blyatskrieg
Saturday night explosions p.rn.
Ukraine jets bombing Snake Island.
https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/15 ... 0230444035
Ukraine jets bombing Snake Island.
https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/15 ... 0230444035
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
Re: Blyatskrieg
Oh, EACL had already posted that.
Here's a different one. Drone attack on small patrol boat at Snake Island
https://twitter.com/michaeldweiss/statu ... 8354798592
Here's a different one. Drone attack on small patrol boat at Snake Island
https://twitter.com/michaeldweiss/statu ... 8354798592
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Blyatskrieg
I posted that one already. There's been a significant drone campaign against Russian positions on Snake Island, and now that the air defences there have been largely destroyed - and the Moskva's AA umbrella gone too - it's made crewed aircraft flights, with their much heavier bombload, possible. The majority of structures on the island have been utterly destroyed as a consequence, and the footage contains evidence of significant secondary explosions, meaning that Russian munitions stored there have been destroyed.lpm wrote: ↑Sat May 07, 2022 9:34 pmSaturday night explosions p.rn.
Ukraine jets bombing Snake Island.
https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/15 ... 0230444035
Re: Blyatskrieg
Damn they are low, it looks like the second aircraft flies through the debris plume of the first plane's attack.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sat May 07, 2022 8:07 pmSnake Island. Sukhoi-27s
Ukrainian airforce is still active, and just bombed Russian positions with crewed aircraft.
Note the damage - these planes can carry a much heavier warload than any drone in Ukrainian service.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Blyatskrieg
Not as low as the Ukrainian Sukhoi-25s seen over the east very recently.bjn wrote: ↑Sat May 07, 2022 9:57 pmDamn they are low, it looks like the second aircraft flies through the debris plume of the first plane's attack.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sat May 07, 2022 8:07 pmSnake Island. Sukhoi-27s
Ukrainian airforce is still active, and just bombed Russian positions with crewed aircraft.
Note the damage - these planes can carry a much heavier warload than any drone in Ukrainian service.
It looks like they might be using parachute retarded bombs, which would make sense, given the altitude.
Re: Blyatskrieg
Over on ISF someone reported the Russians claiming a shopping list of shoot downs at Snake Island, with several Ukrainian aircraft including 3 troop carrying helicopters and one boat claimed destroyed. I'm not clear of the timings of these claims let alone whether they have any bearing on reality but it made me think that the Ukrainians may have thought that reoccupying Snake Island would be the perfect "f.ck you" to rain on Putin's parade.
Re: Blyatskrieg
Oh, so NOW you want evidence??
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Blyatskrieg
Their list included a Sukhoi-23. Sukhoi-23s aren't a real thing, the numbering sequence skips from 17 to 24.Martin Y wrote: ↑Sat May 07, 2022 11:08 pmOver on ISF someone reported the Russians claiming a shopping list of shoot downs at Snake Island, with several Ukrainian aircraft including 3 troop carrying helicopters and one boat claimed destroyed. I'm not clear of the timings of these claims let alone whether they have any bearing on reality but it made me think that the Ukrainians may have thought that reoccupying Snake Island would be the perfect "f.ck you" to rain on Putin's parade.
Might as well have claimed a Mig-28, or perhaps a US supplied Oscar EW 5894 Phallus.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Blyatskrieg
Speaking of Snake Island and helicopters full of troops, a Bayraktar just hit one - an Mi-8 "Hip" - as it was apparently beginning to offload troops onto Snake Island, which won't have been a particularly pleasant experience for those on board.
Re: Blyatskrieg
The tweet I see talks about 1 Su-27 and 1 Su-24 and a Ukrainian assault boat.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 9:15 amTheir list included a Sukhoi-23. Sukhoi-23s aren't a real thing, the numbering sequence skips from 17 to 24.Martin Y wrote: ↑Sat May 07, 2022 11:08 pmOver on ISF someone reported the Russians claiming a shopping list of shoot downs at Snake Island, with several Ukrainian aircraft including 3 troop carrying helicopters and one boat claimed destroyed. I'm not clear of the timings of these claims let alone whether they have any bearing on reality but it made me think that the Ukrainians may have thought that reoccupying Snake Island would be the perfect "f.ck you" to rain on Putin's parade.
Might as well have claimed a Mig-28, or perhaps a US supplied Oscar EW 5894 Phallus.
https://twitter.com/OSINT88/status/1523 ... bq-DHFAuog
But with no supporting evidence
It wouldn't be the first time that Russian propaganda has showed its own losses and claimed them as Ukrainian.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Blyatskrieg
I think they initially claimed Su-23 and Su-24, then changed Su-23 to Su-27 when people laughed at them.jimbob wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 9:36 amThe tweet I see talks about 1 Su-27 and 1 Su-24 and a Ukrainian assault boat.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 9:15 amTheir list included a Sukhoi-23. Sukhoi-23s aren't a real thing, the numbering sequence skips from 17 to 24.Martin Y wrote: ↑Sat May 07, 2022 11:08 pmOver on ISF someone reported the Russians claiming a shopping list of shoot downs at Snake Island, with several Ukrainian aircraft including 3 troop carrying helicopters and one boat claimed destroyed. I'm not clear of the timings of these claims let alone whether they have any bearing on reality but it made me think that the Ukrainians may have thought that reoccupying Snake Island would be the perfect "f.ck you" to rain on Putin's parade.
Might as well have claimed a Mig-28, or perhaps a US supplied Oscar EW 5894 Phallus.
https://twitter.com/OSINT88/status/1523 ... bq-DHFAuog
But with no supporting evidence
It wouldn't be the first time that Russian propaganda has showed its own losses and claimed them as Ukrainian.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Blyatskrieg
More Raptor Assault Boats destroyed round Snake Island, too.
Russia need to either abandon the positions or meaningfully reinforce them now, but reinforcing them means bringing larger ships into the range of Neptune missiles.
Russia need to either abandon the positions or meaningfully reinforce them now, but reinforcing them means bringing larger ships into the range of Neptune missiles.
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7144
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: Blyatskrieg
It’s also telling that Ukraine is able to deploy Byrakrars around the island. They aren’t all needed to fight Russian attacks in the Donbas.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Blyatskrieg
A wreck showed off by the Russians a little while back had a build date after the start of the war. Ukraine is getting more from Turkey even as the war goes on.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 10:38 amIt’s also telling that Ukraine is able to deploy Byrakrars around the island. They aren’t all needed to fight Russian attacks in the Donbas.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Blyatskrieg
IF the RSOTM telegram account is accurate - a big if, as they are a bunch of f.cking Nazis, but also really bad at OPSEC - then Russia's lost Snake Island, and the helicopter that got schwacked unloading troops was carrying SF meant to evacuate the rest.
Huge if, though.
Huge if, though.