tw.tter
Re: tw.tter
Because Twitter has banned API* access by most third parties, people have now been directly scraping the twitter website to get whatever they are after. This added hugely to the load on the servers. To get around that Twitter have rate limited what people could access from the website, only so downloading so many posts a day. However, apparently the web client hasn’t had its retry function reprogrammed since the rate limit was implemented. Now when it hits the limit, it gets stupid and starts to spam the twitter servers with retry requests, ten times a second. They’ve effectively got a massive Distributed Denial of Service attack that they implemented themselves. A rather large self own if there ever was one.
*being able to issue direct requests to their servers to get minimal data sets back with out all the crap you get on a full webpage.
*being able to issue direct requests to their servers to get minimal data sets back with out all the crap you get on a full webpage.
Re: tw.tter
There's also this
https://mastodon.world/@TomatoSoup/110640348545966181
Apparently tw.tter's Google hosting contract ended at midnight last night.
https://mastodon.world/@TomatoSoup/110640348545966181
Apparently tw.tter's Google hosting contract ended at midnight last night.
Re: tw.tter
Yes I did just check. That is genuineElon Musk
@elonmusk
To address extreme levels of data scraping & system manipulation, we’ve applied the following temporary limits:
- Verified accounts are limited to reading 6000 posts/day
- Unverified accounts to 600 posts/day
- New unverified accounts to 300/day
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
Re: tw.tter
Sweet Flying Spaghetti Monster, how has Elon managed to remember to breath let alone become stupidly rich?dyqik wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 7:49 pmThere's also this
https://mastodon.world/@TomatoSoup/110640348545966181
Apparently tw.tter's Google hosting contract ended at midnight last night.
Re: tw.tter
Unfortunately, they didn't reprogram the clients to know about that, so they hammer on the servers until they get a response.jimbob wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 7:52 pmYes I did just check. That is genuineElon Musk
@elonmusk
To address extreme levels of data scraping & system manipulation, we’ve applied the following temporary limits:
- Verified accounts are limited to reading 6000 posts/day
- Unverified accounts to 600 posts/day
- New unverified accounts to 300/day
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7400
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: tw.tter
Er... you know twitter links aren't working?Woodchopper wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:05 pmHa! https://twitter.com/coldwarsteve/status ... 1zY-PW4R9w
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
Re: tw.tter
Ahem….dyqik wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:04 pmUnfortunately, they didn't reprogram the clients to know about that, so they hammer on the servers until they get a response.jimbob wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 7:52 pmYes I did just check. That is genuineElon Musk
@elonmusk
To address extreme levels of data scraping & system manipulation, we’ve applied the following temporary limits:
- Verified accounts are limited to reading 6000 posts/day
- Unverified accounts to 600 posts/day
- New unverified accounts to 300/day
viewtopic.php?p=149418#p149418
My source…
https://sfba.social/@sysop408/110639435788921057
Re: tw.tter
You mean the link I posted above your other response.bjn wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:17 pmAhem….
viewtopic.php?p=149418#p149418
My source…
https://sfba.social/@sysop408/110639435788921057
Re: tw.tter
tweetdeck doesn't seem to be affected (presumably it still has access to the API)lpm wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:12 pmEr... you know twitter links aren't working?Woodchopper wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:05 pmHa! https://twitter.com/coldwarsteve/status ... 1zY-PW4R9w
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
Re: tw.tter
Apologies, somehow missed it. Think I was typing mine up and you ninja’d me.dyqik wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:36 pmYou mean the link I posted above your other response.bjn wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:17 pmAhem….
viewtopic.php?p=149418#p149418
My source…
https://sfba.social/@sysop408/110639435788921057
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7400
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: tw.tter
Odd, works for me when I clicked it.lpm wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:12 pmEr... you know twitter links aren't working?Woodchopper wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:05 pmHa! https://twitter.com/coldwarsteve/status ... 1zY-PW4R9w
Re: tw.tter
I don't have a twitter account and it does not work for me.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 9:38 pmOdd, works for me when I clicked it.lpm wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:12 pmEr... you know twitter links aren't working?Woodchopper wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:05 pmHa! https://twitter.com/coldwarsteve/status ... 1zY-PW4R9w
Jaap's Page: https://www.jaapsch.net/
Re: tw.tter
Likewise. I've never had a twitter account, but I follow links which are kindly curated for me by the likes of folks around here. That's broken now. I'm locked out.
Re: tw.tter
My feed now looks like this: Spoiler:
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7400
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: tw.tter
Ok that explains it. Latest attempt by Musk to destroy his site.Martin Y wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:18 pmLikewise. I've never had a twitter account, but I follow links which are kindly curated for me by the likes of folks around here. That's broken now. I'm locked out.
- El Pollo Diablo
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 3622
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
- Location: FBPE
Re: tw.tter
Presumably, journalism is now impossible?
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7400
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: tw.tter
Yes, looks like what happened is:dyqik wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 7:49 pmThere's also this
https://mastodon.world/@TomatoSoup/110640348545966181
Apparently tw.tter's Google hosting contract ended at midnight last night.
- Google sends the bill for another year of hosting
- Musk decides to move it in house
- Depleted Twitter engineers can’t manage a seamless transition
- Twitter servers can’t cope
- Musk brings in viewing limits
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7400
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: tw.tter
Of course not.
But IMHO without Twitter a lot of individuals will find it harder to find people to view their work. For example the Osint accounts mentioned by EACL or academics writing about current issues (which were very useful on Covid).
The demise of Twitter would probably help major news outlets such as The Guardian as people will be more likely to turn to them to get news.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: tw.tter
And that's bad given that the Guardian are, on some issues, utterly shite.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 7:43 amOf course not.
But IMHO without Twitter a lot of individuals will find it harder to find people to view their work. For example the Osint accounts mentioned by EACL or academics writing about current issues (which were very useful on Covid).
The demise of Twitter would probably help major news outlets such as The Guardian as people will be more likely to turn to them to get news.
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7400
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: tw.tter
The problem with journalism is that it’s based upon generalists submitting copy to tight deadlines. They will try to interview specialists but even so they’re going to get some things very wrong.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 8:21 amAnd that's bad given that the Guardian are, on some issues, utterly shite.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 7:43 amOf course not.
But IMHO without Twitter a lot of individuals will find it harder to find people to view their work. For example the Osint accounts mentioned by EACL or academics writing about current issues (which were very useful on Covid).
The demise of Twitter would probably help major news outlets such as The Guardian as people will be more likely to turn to them to get news.
When it works Twitter can give people direct access to specialists. That includes everyone from people with relevant PhDs through self taught experts to those with direct lived experience.
Though of course Twitter has been highly dysfunctional both in terms of the level of abuse targeted at users (especially women) and Musk’s ongoing incompetence.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: tw.tter
Yes, and it's particularly bad these days with the collapse of local journalism. We used to worry about "parachute journalism" where journalists with no knowledge of an area would turn up and write an article fitting their narrative expectations, well now we have that but without the turning up part, trying to create multiple articles per day from a desk. It results in a lot of recycling of narrative, and not much useful information. The Guardian's no worse than any other outfit on this.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 9:31 amThe problem with journalism is that it’s based upon generalists submitting copy to tight deadlines. They will try to interview specialists but even so they’re going to get some things very wrong.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 8:21 amAnd that's bad given that the Guardian are, on some issues, utterly shite.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 7:43 am
Of course not.
But IMHO without Twitter a lot of individuals will find it harder to find people to view their work. For example the Osint accounts mentioned by EACL or academics writing about current issues (which were very useful on Covid).
The demise of Twitter would probably help major news outlets such as The Guardian as people will be more likely to turn to them to get news.
Though there can also be problems - and again the Guardian's no worse than most papers on this - where activist enthusiasm is mistaken for knowledge.
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7400
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: tw.tter
Certainly, and lots of skills are needed to distinguish between genuine knowledge or expertise and someone writing something that seems plausible.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 10:51 amYes, and it's particularly bad these days with the collapse of local journalism. We used to worry about "parachute journalism" where journalists with no knowledge of an area would turn up and write an article fitting their narrative expectations, well now we have that but without the turning up part, trying to create multiple articles per day from a desk. It results in a lot of recycling of narrative, and not much useful information. The Guardian's no worse than any other outfit on this.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 9:31 amThe problem with journalism is that it’s based upon generalists submitting copy to tight deadlines. They will try to interview specialists but even so they’re going to get some things very wrong.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 8:21 am
And that's bad given that the Guardian are, on some issues, utterly shite.
Though there can also be problems - and again the Guardian's no worse than most papers on this - where activist enthusiasm is mistaken for knowledge.
Re: tw.tter
If you are just willing to see a tweet, or are looking for the timeline of a user, you can use:
https://publish.twitter.com/
The trick is that embedding still works.
It is far from perfect, because you can not access the replies of the tweet, and for a timeline, you only see the last 20 or so tweets on the timeline of the user you are looking for.
https://publish.twitter.com/
The trick is that embedding still works.
It is far from perfect, because you can not access the replies of the tweet, and for a timeline, you only see the last 20 or so tweets on the timeline of the user you are looking for.
Re: tw.tter
Musk is trying to sue the law firm that the previous owners used to force him to honour his offer to buy Twitter.
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/07/07/elon-mu ... -fee-.html
I'm sure that is going to go well.
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/07/07/elon-mu ... -fee-.html
I'm sure that is going to go well.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation