tw.tter

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Post Reply
User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5302
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: tw.tter

Post by jimbob » Mon Oct 09, 2023 3:09 pm

Gfamily wrote:
Mon Oct 09, 2023 3:06 pm
jimbob wrote:
Mon Oct 09, 2023 2:31 pm
I do have a bluesky invite code if anyone wants
How quickly do new sign-ups get their own invite code? MrsG has signed up using Gfamdottir's invite, so I'll hang on until I can use MrsG's.
A couple of weeks for me.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 5229
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: tw.tter

Post by Gfamily » Mon Oct 09, 2023 3:23 pm

jimbob wrote:
Mon Oct 09, 2023 3:09 pm
Gfamily wrote:
Mon Oct 09, 2023 3:06 pm
jimbob wrote:
Mon Oct 09, 2023 2:31 pm
I do have a bluesky invite code if anyone wants
How quickly do new sign-ups get their own invite code? MrsG has signed up using Gfamdottir's invite, so I'll hang on until I can use MrsG's.
A couple of weeks for me.
Cheers.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5302
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: tw.tter

Post by jimbob » Mon Oct 09, 2023 4:25 pm

Gfamily wrote:
Mon Oct 09, 2023 3:23 pm
jimbob wrote:
Mon Oct 09, 2023 3:09 pm
Gfamily wrote:
Mon Oct 09, 2023 3:06 pm


How quickly do new sign-ups get their own invite code? MrsG has signed up using Gfamdottir's invite, so I'll hang on until I can use MrsG's.
A couple of weeks for me.
Cheers.
Just use mine, it'll be replaced soon enough anyway
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 5229
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: tw.tter

Post by Gfamily » Mon Oct 09, 2023 5:33 pm

jimbob wrote:
Mon Oct 09, 2023 4:25 pm
Just use mine, it'll be replaced soon enough anyway
I'll have a route in soon enough - so if someone else is looking for one...
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

User avatar
bjn
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2934
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:58 pm
Location: London

Re: tw.tter

Post by bjn » Tue Oct 10, 2023 6:36 am

Musk showing who he relies on for an ‘unbiased’ source information…
Attachments
IMG_5225.jpeg
IMG_5225.jpeg (104.62 KiB) Viewed 6203 times

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4776
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: tw.tter

Post by Grumble » Tue Oct 10, 2023 9:40 pm

Just been on Xitter. Was reading a Democracy Docket tweet about gerrymandering and about three replies down it was all photos of improbably proportioned young women. I mean, it’s a pretty dry subject to start bombarding with escort ads or whatever they were.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 7571
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: tw.tter

Post by dyqik » Wed Oct 11, 2023 7:11 am

Grumble wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2023 9:40 pm
Just been on Xitter. Was reading a Democracy Docket tweet about gerrymandering and about three replies down it was all photos of improbably proportioned young women. I mean, it’s a pretty dry subject to start bombarding with escort ads or whatever they were.
Phishing scams, blackmail gathering attempts and attempts to set up advance fee fraud is mostly what they are.

temptar
Fuzzable
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun May 10, 2020 6:19 pm

Re: tw.tter

Post by temptar » Wed Oct 11, 2023 5:09 pm

Elon has picked a fight with Thierry Breton. This could be popcorn worthy….

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7082
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: tw.tter

Post by Woodchopper » Thu Oct 12, 2023 8:37 am

temptar wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2023 5:09 pm
Elon has picked a fight with Thierry Breton. This could be popcorn worthy….
This is not a fight that Musk can win.

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 7571
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: tw.tter

Post by dyqik » Thu Oct 12, 2023 9:23 am

Particularly when coupled with NPR's experiment of stopping Twitter promotion, which has had miniscule effect:

https://indieweb.social/@tchambers/111219082248580986

https://niemanreports.org/articles/npr-twitter-musk/

User avatar
Martin Y
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3088
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Re: tw.tter

Post by Martin Y » Mon Nov 06, 2023 3:26 pm

Yaxley-Lennon and Hopkins reinstated, because hate speech is the new small talk.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-67331288

As Wilde said, there's only one thing worse than being talked about and that's being talked about by Katie Hopkins.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7082
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: tw.tter

Post by Woodchopper » Tue Dec 19, 2023 7:22 am

The European Commission has opened formal proceedings to assess whether X may have breached the Digital Services Act (DSA) in areas linked to risk management, content moderation, dark patterns, advertising transparency and data access for researchers.
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/pressco ... IP_23_6709

Much more at the link.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7082
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: tw.tter

Post by Woodchopper » Tue Jan 02, 2024 8:29 pm

Fidelity has again marked down the value of its shares in X Holdings, which the mutual fund giant helped Elon Musk buy for $44 billion when the company was known as Twitter.

By the numbers: Fidelity believes that X is worth 71.5% less than at the time of purchase, according to a new disclosure that runs through the end of November 2023 (Fidelity revalues private shares on a one-month lag).

This includes a 10.7% cut during November, during which time Musk told boycotting X advertisers to "go f**k yourself" during an on-stage interview with the New York Times.

In terms of publicly traded comps, Meta stock rose 4.9% in November while Snap shares climbed 38.2%.
https://www.axios.com/2023/12/31/elon-m ... uation-cut

User avatar
Brightonian
Dorkwood
Posts: 1440
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:16 pm
Location: Usually UK, often France and Ireland

Re: tw.tter

Post by Brightonian » Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:59 pm

I've read that invite codes are no longer required to join Bluesky.

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8272
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: tw.tter

Post by shpalman » Tue Feb 06, 2024 5:28 pm

Brightonian wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:59 pm
I've read that invite codes are no longer required to join Bluesky.
I just joined.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7082
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: tw.tter

Post by Woodchopper » Sun Mar 31, 2024 9:26 am

Woodchopper wrote:
Tue Jan 02, 2024 8:29 pm
Fidelity has again marked down the value of its shares in X Holdings, which the mutual fund giant helped Elon Musk buy for $44 billion when the company was known as Twitter.

By the numbers: Fidelity believes that X is worth 71.5% less than at the time of purchase, according to a new disclosure that runs through the end of November 2023 (Fidelity revalues private shares on a one-month lag).

This includes a 10.7% cut during November, during which time Musk told boycotting X advertisers to "go f**k yourself" during an on-stage interview with the New York Times.

In terms of publicly traded comps, Meta stock rose 4.9% in November while Snap shares climbed 38.2%.
https://www.axios.com/2023/12/31/elon-m ... uation-cut
And they continue to down write the value of the company: https://fortune.com/2024/03/30/fidelity ... -takeover/

IvanV
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 11:12 am

Re: tw.tter

Post by IvanV » Tue Apr 09, 2024 6:00 pm

There's been a correspondence in the Economist criticising their repeated use of the phrase "X formerly known as Twitter". The first letter, paraphrased, roughly went "Grow up." A follow-up calculated how many pointless words they had printed, by failing to use a one word name, but did not say which one-word name that correspondent preferred. Another preferred "X which everyone except its narcissistic owner calls Twitter".

The BBC still calls it "X formerly known as Twitter".

Despite haemorrhaging users, Xwitter still has 1000 times more than Truth Social. Xwitter has lost a lot of money for Musk, but unfortunately, despite its dire business position - costs 10 times income in a recent SEC filing - Truth Social could well make a lot of money for Trump, according to the analysis in this LegalEagle analysis (youtube 20 mins), which also exposes a remarkable amount of legal shenanigans. (This one is presented by Liz Dye who is actually rather better than the usual LE presenter.)

Post Reply