Re: First asylum seeker removals to Rwanda set for 14 June
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:15 pm
Looks like the flight has been cancelled, for now.
Open to critical enquiry
https://scrutable.science/
Think the government would have been happy whatever. If the deportations happened, they look like they're doing something about immigration*, but now they've lost, they get to complain about the Human Rights Act and the undemocratic courts to an appreciative press**. Either way, the right wing is appeased and distracted from Johnson's failings. Similar thing with NI is going on too. Either they get to say "See, we're sorting it out. Deliver Brexit", or they get to complain about the EU getting in the way.
The ECHR was originally proposed by Winston Churchill and drafted mainly by British lawyers.
Indeed, but we know that Johnson lies and the anti Europe press has been deliberately conflating if for as long as I can remember.
Sorry for being a bit terse. I was just slightly put out that a discussion of policy seemed to be based on one anecdote and the Bayesian analysis comment seemed to be making light of the issue a bit.Gfamily wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:57 pmdiscovolante wrote: ↑Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:21 pmIt would be quite a poor analysis if you based it on your own experience only rather than the publicly available experience and knowledge of other people who have claimed asylum and experts who support them.
I'm not sure what you think I'm saying.
Tessa asked whether refugees would be aware of the likelihood of being sent to Rwanda, with the very valid point that the traffickers are not likely to let them know what the UK's government had in mind for them, and suggested that in fleeing from their original homes they wouldn't have any way of finding that out before ending up on an inflatable.
My point is that it often takes months of travel independently or in groups to get to the channel, and that there's a reasonable amount of information sharing about routes, countries and the rules and systems for claiming asylum in each. As you say, "publicly available experience and knowledge"; it'll get shared.
I think a significant number will know, that's all. I don't know how many it'll deter from making the crossing though.
I have some experience (not a lot, but some) of helping refugees, and there is a lot of sharing of information.discovolante wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 11:06 am.
Lots of knowledge is publicly available but it doesn't mean people have accessed it.
So do I, and I also know people who have been disappointed and frustrated at how they have been treated because they expected things to be different.Gfamily wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 11:24 amI have some experience (not a lot, but some) of helping refugees, and there is a lot of sharing of information.discovolante wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 11:06 am.
Lots of knowledge is publicly available but it doesn't mean people have accessed it.
My Bayesian comment was genuine - in that Tessa had suggested that people being trafficked across the channel would not be aware of the hostile environment and the threat of being sent to Rwanda.
My example that a randomly chosen contact* from the migrant population having a good knowledge of the different systems suggests that this knowledge is at least somewhat present in that population.
* we had no contact with any refugees before we were asked if we could house him.
I wonder how long it will take for word to get around the world about where this country is headed.discovolante wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:07 pmSo do I, and I also know people who have been disappointed and frustrated at how they have been treated because they expected things to be different.Gfamily wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 11:24 amI have some experience (not a lot, but some) of helping refugees, and there is a lot of sharing of information.discovolante wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 11:06 am.
Lots of knowledge is publicly available but it doesn't mean people have accessed it.
My Bayesian comment was genuine - in that Tessa had suggested that people being trafficked across the channel would not be aware of the hostile environment and the threat of being sent to Rwanda.
My example that a randomly chosen contact* from the migrant population having a good knowledge of the different systems suggests that this knowledge is at least somewhat present in that population.
* we had no contact with any refugees before we were asked if we could house him.
For a lot of the rest of the world this is the norm I’m afraid. There’s around 190 countries in the world and most of them act like this in one way or another. The fact they we’ve decided to join them is horrible.Tessa K wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:23 pmI wonder how long it will take for word to get around the world about where this country is headed.discovolante wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:07 pmSo do I, and I also know people who have been disappointed and frustrated at how they have been treated because they expected things to be different.Gfamily wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 11:24 am
I have some experience (not a lot, but some) of helping refugees, and there is a lot of sharing of information.
My Bayesian comment was genuine - in that Tessa had suggested that people being trafficked across the channel would not be aware of the hostile environment and the threat of being sent to Rwanda.
My example that a randomly chosen contact* from the migrant population having a good knowledge of the different systems suggests that this knowledge is at least somewhat present in that population.
* we had no contact with any refugees before we were asked if we could house him.
Today I learnt there's a commitment to it in the Brexit agreement too, which is a more direct link to the EU.
Unfortunately somewhat undermined by Labour Spokesman shortly after - clickyStranger Mouse wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 4:13 pmReally good takedown by Yvette Cooper
https://twitter.com/bestforbritain/stat ... 6QoarK0LcA
There's an absolutely key point there - people have always said it's impossible for Afghans or others to apply for asylum when in their own country. But of course the Government could let them apply online, like the Ukrainians, to avoid the people traffickers. There you are, Priti, sortedLittle waster wrote: ↑Thu Jun 16, 2022 4:37 pmFor those who didn’t see it Quentin Letts’ meltdown on GMB was impressive.
Only current YouTube link https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ynsv24-g2pY
He seemed genuinely affronted that somebody might actually fact-check his b.llsh.t. It just goes to show the firm reasoning behind his support for the policy when the only way he could justify it was by simply making sh.t up.
I suppose the sad thing is it is now newsworthy when a journalist does what really should be considered the bare minimum, in challenging an interviewee on blatantly false claims rather than taking a cowardly “both sides” approach in the name of faux balance.
Can't believe they missed the 2nd oLittle waster wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 2:07 pmJohnson (or "Borish" as the typically flakey Gradgrind live feed aptly named him) is to describe "
It was there, but then the septum failed. Can't think why.tom p wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 4:27 pmCan't believe they missed the 2nd oLittle waster wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 2:07 pmJohnson (or "Borish" as the typically flakey Gradgrind live feed aptly named him) is to describe "
A hostel that has been leased by the Rwandan government to house asylum seekers from the UK is making preparations to accept children.
The Hope hostel in Kigali is building outdoor facilities that will include football pitches, basketball courts and outdoor toys for any children who are flown to the east African country...
[The manager, Elisee Kalyango] confirmed they were taking steps to prepare for the arrival of children under the policy, and said: “We are ready to handle people from any age.”
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... -and-ghanaAdeniyi Raji, 48, is a gay man facing removal to Nigeria for a second time. He was interviewed by the Guardian in 2017 when he first faced deportation. “I’m in the UK because I need protection. If I’m returned to Nigeria, they will kill me,” he said.
He shared screenshots of death threats he had received from people in Nigeria. One said: “So after all that we did to you before, you are still a practising homosexual. Wait until we see you down here, that will be the end of you.”
Government guidance published in February 2022 states that LGBTI people are persecuted in Nigeria, that gay men found to be involved in same sex acts are liable to be jailed for 14 years, while in the northern states, where Sharia law prevails, the punishment is death.