Re: w.nking as ethnographic field method
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2022 1:20 pm
The statement includes:
As far as I remember, the now retracted article contained an author bio which stated that he is doing a PhD at Manchester. So at some point during the publication process he appears to have been enrolled.The research involving participants described in the paper was conducted for his MA at a University in Berlin. There is contradictory information regarding when the period of self-immersive research activity took place.
Good that has been confirmed.The described research methodology and data collection were not submitted for University of Manchester research ethics approval. The production of the paper was not part of his supervised PhD programme of study.
The rejection happened after the article was published (in May 2022 as far as I remember).The student was registered for a PhD but the research design which he developed, and the methods he proposed for conducting the research for his PhD was submitted to, and rejected by, our University Research Ethics Committee (UREC) on 17 June 2022.