Page 4 of 7

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 4:24 pm
by Tessa K
Stranger Mouse wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:18 pm
Tessa K wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:06 pm
Gfamily wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:35 pm
I suspect he would have thought "I could learn Arabic and then read the Quran", called on teachers, spent some time, failed to learn Arabic, and then left it another unfulfilled ambition.
He'll probably just learn how to read a section aloud.
I suspect that’s how Boris Johnson has convinced everyone he’s some super talented polyglot.
His response to Macron recently was in the most appalling child's French.

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 4:39 pm
by monkey
Tessa K wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 4:24 pm
Stranger Mouse wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:18 pm
Tessa K wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:06 pm


He'll probably just learn how to read a section aloud.
I suspect that’s how Boris Johnson has convinced everyone he’s some super talented polyglot.
His response to Macron recently was in the most appalling child's French.
I'd have thought that studying classics at Oxford he'd have some aptitude at languages, even if he only had to learn dead ones. I guess that was just part of him learning how to blag his way through life.

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 5:25 pm
by Tessa K
monkey wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 4:39 pm
Tessa K wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 4:24 pm
Stranger Mouse wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:18 pm


I suspect that’s how Boris Johnson has convinced everyone he’s some super talented polyglot.
His response to Macron recently was in the most appalling child's French.
I'd have thought that studying classics at Oxford he'd have some aptitude at languages, even if he only had to learn dead ones. I guess that was just part of him learning how to blag his way through life.
When you study dead languages you rarely have to speak them.

As part of my French degree we covered mediaeval French. I could read it fluently back then but never spoke it.

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 6:29 pm
by Stranger Mouse
An update to that viral “police brutality” video that is going around

https://twitter.com/sherpaginseng/statu ... ycdmZIkU4A

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 7:18 pm
by wilsontown
To be fair, Arabic is really, really hard. At least if you start off knowing English. It works completely differently.

I spent a few years going to Egypt quite a bit for fieldwork, and I could eventually speak some useful phrases and understand a bit, but I couldn't read or write a word.

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 7:50 pm
by Stranger Mouse
wilsontown wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 7:18 pm
To be fair, Arabic is really, really hard. At least if you start off knowing English. It works completely differently.

I spent a few years going to Egypt quite a bit for fieldwork, and I could eventually speak some useful phrases and understand a bit, but I couldn't read or write a word.
I think the point is more than he and his supporters exaggerate his linguistic achievements rather than criticism of his actual level

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:01 pm
by wilsontown
Yes, that's probably fair. You wouldn't be getting to the point of reading the Qur'an in the original, as a native English speaker, without many years of full-time study. I would doubt that he's got the time. Any pretence otherwise would be just that.

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:11 pm
by Gfamily
Stranger Mouse wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 7:50 pm
wilsontown wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 7:18 pm
To be fair, Arabic is really, really hard. At least if you start off knowing English. It works completely differently.

I spent a few years going to Egypt quite a bit for fieldwork, and I could eventually speak some useful phrases and understand a bit, but I couldn't read or write a word.
I think the point is more than he and his supporters exaggerate his linguistic achievements rather than criticism of his actual level
That would accord with the opinion given here
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017 ... went-wrong

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 9:00 pm
by EACLucifer
wilsontown wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:01 pm
Yes, that's probably fair. You wouldn't be getting to the point of reading the Qur'an in the original, as a native English speaker, without many years of full-time study. I would doubt that he's got the time. Any pretence otherwise would be just that.
Apparently*, it's pretty difficult to get started even as a native Arabic speaker if one comes from a region where the dialect is quite far from classical Arabic.


*Source; a couple of people wot I have known over the years.

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 9:03 pm
by EACLucifer
Stranger Mouse wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 6:29 pm
An update to that viral “police brutality” video that is going around

https://twitter.com/sherpaginseng/statu ... ycdmZIkU4A
The original post was by Lowkey, a delusional conspiracy theorist, antisemite, and all-round a..eh.le.

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 9:09 pm
by Bird on a Fire
Yeah, it'd be pretty funny if he spent ages learning Moroccan, got quite good at it, and only then realised he still couldn't understand the Koran.

Re: The King

Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2022 3:28 pm
by Allo V Psycho
Shall we have a sweep on how long it takes for the 'Faculty of Homoeopathy' of which he is Royal Patron to become the Royal College of Homoeopathy? "On the advice of his ministers', of course.

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2022 9:43 am
by IvanV
EACLucifer wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 9:00 pm
wilsontown wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:01 pm
Yes, that's probably fair. You wouldn't be getting to the point of reading the Qur'an in the original, as a native English speaker, without many years of full-time study. I would doubt that he's got the time. Any pretence otherwise would be just that.
Apparently*, it's pretty difficult to get started even as a native Arabic speaker if one comes from a region where the dialect is quite far from classical Arabic.
The use of the term "Arabic" is kind of as if Italian, Spanish, French, Portuguese, Rumanian, etc, were all called "Latin". Or Russian, Czech, Polish, Serbian, etc, were all called "Slavonic". Though since various large empires in the large regions where Arabs live existed more recently than the western Roman empire, they probably had more cross-contact and hence a bit less divergence than the decendants of Latin.

Then "reading the Qur'an" for a modern Arab speaker is like a modern speaker of such "Latin" trying to understand the Latin Vulgate Bible or Liturgy. The Vulgate is about 250 yrs older than the Qur'an, which from this distance is a fairly small difference. It is indeed harder to understand Roman Latin if you are Rumanian or French, but it is far from straightforward for an Italian from the Lazio region. But even the more recent Old Church Slavonic, used by Cyril and Methodius to translate the bible in the 9th century, is pretty much unintelligible to speakers of modern Slavonic languages. Fortunately for the Slavonic speakers, of various denominations, a lot of religious texts were later updated to a standard "Church Slavonic" of about the 14th-15th century, which is not quite as remote. Though it is still the same common "Church Slavonic" text you are given to read whether you are Serbian or Russian, etc, though the orthography is updated to the local modern orthography.

When typical Muslims are taught to "read the Qur'an", what this means is, learning the craft of reciting the words you see in front of you. This is typically achieved through memorisation. Memorising the Qur'an is a valued craft in Islam. People who have been "taught to read the Qur'an" have not necessarily learned to read. As recently as 100 years ago it was still common for schools in Egypt to teach people to "read the Qur'an", but not teach people to read. Might be dangerous if they could actually read. These days people do also learn to read. And so if their reading language uses Arabic script, so they may be able to observe the letters in the text before them, as a literate Spaniard can observe the letters of the Latin text before them, and in effect learn how to interpret the actual letters of the text. So many modern "readers of the Qur'an" will be able to read it off the text in front of them, or at least take cues from that text, rather than entirely memorising it. Nor have "readers of the Qur'an" generally been taught to understand Classical Arabic in general. They are generally provided with an modern language interpretation of the text they have learned to recite, not a translation of it. And that interpretation will be coloured by the particular religious tradition of the teacher. Again, might be dangerous if they could actually understand it literally, at least that is why the Catholic Church refused to allow the translation of the bible into the vernacular for so long.

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2022 12:06 pm
by Martin Y
plodder wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:43 am
Tessa K wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:30 am
Now that we're no longer Elizabethans, what are we? Carolingians?
Huh? We’ve never called ourselves Elizabethans, that’s for the prats in Blackadder with tights and ruffs.
The only place I ever came across anyone calling themselves Elizabethan was in the Molesworth books, published right at the start of Elizabeth's reign. And I now discover those Molesworth stories began in Punch and were then serialised in a children's magazine called "The Young Elizabethan".

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2022 12:08 pm
by Tessa K
Martin Y wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 12:06 pm
plodder wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:43 am
Tessa K wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:30 am
Now that we're no longer Elizabethans, what are we? Carolingians?
Huh? We’ve never called ourselves Elizabethans, that’s for the prats in Blackadder with tights and ruffs.
The only place I ever came across anyone calling themselves Elizabethan was in the Molesworth books, published right at the start of Elizabeth's reign. And I now discover those Molesworth stories began in Punch and were then serialised in a children's magazine called "The Young Elizabethan".
I love this place. A flippant remark turns into a series of informed and fascinating responses.

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2022 12:13 pm
by EACLucifer
Martin Y wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 12:06 pm
plodder wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:43 am
Tessa K wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:30 am
Now that we're no longer Elizabethans, what are we? Carolingians?
Huh? We’ve never called ourselves Elizabethans, that’s for the prats in Blackadder with tights and ruffs.
The only place I ever came across anyone calling themselves Elizabethan was in the Molesworth books, published right at the start of Elizabeth's reign. And I now discover those Molesworth stories began in Punch and were then serialised in a children's magazine called "The Young Elizabethan".
As any fule kno

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2022 4:14 pm
by LydiaGwilt
Martin Y wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 12:06 pm
plodder wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:43 am
Tessa K wrote:
Mon Sep 19, 2022 8:30 am
Now that we're no longer Elizabethans, what are we? Carolingians?
Huh? We’ve never called ourselves Elizabethans, that’s for the prats in Blackadder with tights and ruffs.
The only place I ever came across anyone calling themselves Elizabethan was in the Molesworth books, published right at the start of Elizabeth's reign. And I now discover those Molesworth stories began in Punch and were then serialised in a children's magazine called "The Young Elizabethan".
It was originally the Collins magazine (published by what became Harper Collins). My mother collected them and I have 4-years' worth in folders (1948-52) There are also only about 2 issues of The Young Elizabethan - don't know if it folded or family circumstances intervened. They are dated now, of course, but actually have some very good articles and stories

Re: The King

Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2022 5:09 pm
by basementer
As I said upthread, it was still being published when I was at junior school in the 1960s. By that point it had become simply "Elizabethan".

Re: The King

Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2022 11:44 am
by LydiaGwilt
Sorry, I did read that, but was interrupted halfway through writing

Re: The King

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 4:54 am
by plodder
Lol, he’s briefing against Truss already

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... sss-advice

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 12:29 pm
by Tessa K
Would they really have the coronation on the same day as the FA Cup Final? June 3 is the widely touted date

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 12:53 pm
by JQH
I would be surprised if they do. The blazers will tug their forelocks and move the Cup Final.

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 2:24 pm
by philbo
JQH wrote:
Mon Oct 10, 2022 12:53 pm
I would be surprised if they do. The blazers will tug their forelocks and move the Cup Final.
Queue choruses of "who's the bastard in the crown" on the terraces

Re: The King

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 2:54 pm
by dyqik
Little waster wrote:
Sun Sep 18, 2022 3:47 pm
Tessa K wrote:
Sun Sep 18, 2022 2:28 pm
Gfamily wrote:
Sun Sep 18, 2022 12:56 pm


Needs to be a 21C monarch.
21st century? No chance. 18C if we're lucky
You just need to bash him on the head with a heavy Bible three more times.
Delayed quibble: don't you also need to place him in copious quantities of water in between?

Re: The King

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 5:02 pm
by Gfamily
Tessa K wrote:
Mon Oct 10, 2022 12:29 pm
Would they really have the coronation on the same day as the FA Cup Final? June 3 is the widely touted date
But they've gone for 6th May


ETA linky