FTX

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
noggins
Snowbonk
Posts: 572
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:30 pm

Re: FTX

Post by noggins » Thu Dec 01, 2022 8:02 am

crypto-libertarianism grows out of the coddled exceptionalist american experience.

User avatar
nekomatic
Dorkwood
Posts: 1376
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:04 pm

Re: FTX

Post by nekomatic » Fri Dec 02, 2022 10:35 am

Move-a… side, and let the mango through… let the mango through

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: FTX

Post by lpm » Fri Dec 02, 2022 1:17 pm

nekomatic wrote:
Fri Dec 02, 2022 10:35 am
FTX: conscious and intentional fraud
That's hilarious. Not even an attempt to cover their tracks. "Shall we launder this through off-shore accounts in the Caymans?" "Nah, why bother."
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
bjn
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2916
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:58 pm
Location: London

Re: FTX

Post by bjn » Sat Dec 03, 2022 8:18 am

Just pointing out that we've been here before in various guises, for example... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildcat_banking

The joke in nerd circles is that crypto idiots are speed running mainstream financial history.

User avatar
bjn
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2916
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:58 pm
Location: London

Re: FTX

Post by bjn » Fri Dec 09, 2022 7:37 am

Article on Bitcoin and the philosophy that drives it. Expands on the ideas I mentioned above about it being a libertarian idiocy.

https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/th ... f-bitcoin/

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4746
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: FTX

Post by Grumble » Fri Dec 09, 2022 8:50 am

bjn wrote:
Fri Dec 09, 2022 7:37 am
Article on Bitcoin and the philosophy that drives it. Expands on the ideas I mentioned above about it being a libertarian idiocy.

https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/th ... f-bitcoin/
Thanks, comparing it to the gold standard really helps clarify things for a numpty like me.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
bjn
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2916
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:58 pm
Location: London

Re: FTX

Post by bjn » Fri Dec 09, 2022 9:37 am

Behind it all is the idea that money is a thing that should have inherent value separate from economic activity.

IvanV
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2663
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 11:12 am

Re: FTX

Post by IvanV » Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:04 am

bjn wrote:
Fri Dec 09, 2022 9:37 am
Behind it all is the idea that money is a thing that should have inherent value separate from economic activity.
And the contradiction that crypto has no inherent value, except stablecoins which gain their inherent value from the Proper Money that backs them.

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5276
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: FTX

Post by jimbob » Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:20 am

IvanV wrote:
Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:04 am
bjn wrote:
Fri Dec 09, 2022 9:37 am
Behind it all is the idea that money is a thing that should have inherent value separate from economic activity.
And the contradiction that crypto has no inherent value, except stablecoins which gain their inherent value from the Proper Money that backs them.
The Proper Money that the advocates claim back them... But with varying levels of transparency and plausibility.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
bjn
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2916
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:58 pm
Location: London

Re: FTX

Post by bjn » Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:02 pm

Grumble wrote:
Fri Dec 09, 2022 8:50 am
bjn wrote:
Fri Dec 09, 2022 7:37 am
Article on Bitcoin and the philosophy that drives it. Expands on the ideas I mentioned above about it being a libertarian idiocy.

https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/th ... f-bitcoin/
Thanks, comparing it to the gold standard really helps clarify things for a numpty like me.
Gerard’s Attack Of The Fifty Foot Blockchain is a good book to read on crypto crap.

User avatar
Brightonian
Dorkwood
Posts: 1429
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:16 pm
Location: Usually UK, often France and Ireland

Re: FTX

Post by Brightonian » Sat Dec 10, 2022 11:21 am

From a group chat between execs from different crypto companies on Signal:
The more damage you do now, the more jail time
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/09/tech ... sages.html

Whole industry sounds like a criminal cartel (yeah, I know cartels are generally illegal).

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 7527
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: FTX

Post by dyqik » Sat Dec 10, 2022 1:03 pm

Brightonian wrote:
Sat Dec 10, 2022 11:21 am
From a group chat between execs from different crypto companies on Signal:
The more damage you do now, the more jail time
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/09/tech ... sages.html

Whole industry sounds like a criminal cartel (yeah, I know cartels are generally illegal).
And from it, we see that most of the crypto ecosystem is tightly coupled to each other, relies on one central stable-coin system, and that relatively small amounts of trading can destabilize that stable-coin.
The texts also show that industry leaders were acutely aware that the actions of a single firm or fluctuations in the value of one virtual currency could destabilize the whole industry. The exchanges became increasingly tense as Mr. Bankman-Fried and Mr. Zhao traded barbs.
Tether is a stable-coin pegged to the US dollar that is widely used for trading crypto.
In one of the Nov. 10 messages to the group, Mr. Zhao pointed out a $250,000 trade by Alameda that he said was intended to destabilize Tether. The trade was visible on the blockchain, a public ledger of cryptocurrency transactions that anyone can view.

In response to Mr. Zhao’s accusations, Mr. Bankman-Fried seemed nonplused. “Huh?” he said. “What am I doing to stablecoins?”

“Are you claiming that you think that $250k of USDT trading would depeg it?” he added, using a common shorthand to refer to the Tether currency.
It didn't actually depeg, but if a $250k trade could cause concern about depegging, then the system could be collapsed really easily

User avatar
sTeamTraen
After Pie
Posts: 2554
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Re: FTX

Post by sTeamTraen » Tue Dec 13, 2022 12:09 am

It seems that SBF has been arrested in the Bahamas today, on the basis of a warrant from the US.
Something something hammer something something nail

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: FTX

Post by lpm » Tue Dec 13, 2022 3:31 pm

lpm wrote:
Fri Dec 02, 2022 1:17 pm
nekomatic wrote:
Fri Dec 02, 2022 10:35 am
FTX: conscious and intentional fraud
That's hilarious. Not even an attempt to cover their tracks. "Shall we launder this through off-shore accounts in the Caymans?" "Nah, why bother."
Um... they had a Signal chat group called "Wirefraud" to chat about their wire fraud...
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

IvanV
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2663
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 11:12 am

Re: FTX

Post by IvanV » Tue Dec 13, 2022 4:11 pm

The FCA fortunately refused to give FTX an authorisation to operate in Britain, though of course there were many British customers who engaged with it on-line and unprotected. I was rather hoping this might be because the FCA was sensible enough to refuse all crypto exchanges authorisation in Britain. But this is not so. Though it is a bit tricky finding a list of who is authorised, and it turns out that some of them have temporary authorisations that should have been determined in mid-21, but the final day of judgment has been deferred.

It seems that until end 2020, crypto exchanges operated outside the purview of the FCA within Britain as unregulated activity. But then in Jan 2021, the FCA required them to register, if they wished to operate "in" Britain, whatever that means, to demonstrate compliance with anti-money laundering rules. It was possible to get a temporary registration initially, and they had 6 months to comply properly to get a proper registration. One news article suggested that at one point there were about 34 temporary registrations, but it fell since then. Whilst some larger exchanges were eventually refused registration at the end of the 6 month grace period, some smaller ones have had temporary registrations extended, and the FCA has talked about 3 years to finish the process.

So the largest of them, Binance, was unable to satisfy the requirements, and had to cease all regulated activity in Britain in mid 2021. FTX was also denied registration.

But there are quite a few registered exchanges, not just on this temporary never-never basis. Crypto.com is a larger one that achieved a UK registration as recently as August 2022, and also registered in Paris.

So it would seem that the FCA has not been caught with its pants down authorising a demonstrably dodgy crypto exchange yet, but the risk remains. It has fortunately denied registration to the most egregious cases. But with all these temporary registrations in limbo, there is a chance of a problem yet. And of course FCA registration is no guarantee of good behaviour, plenty of dodgy operators were FCA registered, like BCCI. The main concern of the FCA in overseeing these exchanges is preventing money-laundering, not protecting customers.

I went down this little rabbit-hole because a youtuber I sometime watch had a Crypto.com advert on his backdrop for a while, but it has gone now. Doubtless he noticed that various celebrities promoting FTX got sued. So I wondered who crypto.com are, and found out that they are actually authorised in the UK, as of very recently.

No good will come of, I should expect. But there are prominent members of the present govt who see this as part of a tech and finance future the UK should make a lot of money out of, and needs to be encouraged. Likewise Jeremy *unt was proposing just the other day relaxing some of those rules we found we needed after the misdeeds that led to the global financial crisis. We've always ended up paying for that kind of thing, so it smacks of desperation to be trying it again.

User avatar
sTeamTraen
After Pie
Posts: 2554
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Re: FTX

Post by sTeamTraen » Tue Dec 13, 2022 5:03 pm

lpm wrote:
Tue Dec 13, 2022 3:31 pm
Um... they had a Signal chat group called "Wirefraud" to chat about their wire fraud...
Yep, reported here.
Something something hammer something something nail

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 7527
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: FTX

Post by dyqik » Tue Dec 13, 2022 7:32 pm

Relatedly, Binance, the main competitor and now successor to FTX, has had $1.9 billion of withdrawals in 24 hours.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: FTX

Post by Woodchopper » Thu Dec 15, 2022 5:36 pm

7B828BCD-664E-42D0-AA07-EEB5DA56A959.jpeg
7B828BCD-664E-42D0-AA07-EEB5DA56A959.jpeg (304.97 KiB) Viewed 5998 times

User avatar
bjn
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2916
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:58 pm
Location: London

Re: FTX

Post by bjn » Thu Dec 15, 2022 6:22 pm

From my understanding, he actually gave slightly more to the republicans.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: FTX

Post by Woodchopper » Thu Dec 22, 2022 4:05 am

Two former top executives of Sam Bankman-Fried’s crypto trading empire have pleaded guilty to federal criminal fraud charges and are cooperating in the case against the disgraced crypto entrepreneur, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York said on Wednesday night.

The two are Caroline Ellison, who was the chief executive of the cryptocurrency trading company Alameda Research, and Gary Wang, a founder of the FTX crypto exchange. They were key lieutenants in Mr. Bankman-Fried’s vast business empire, which rested primarily on FTX and Alameda, companies that he founded and ran.

The Securities and Exchange Commission also filed civil fraud charges against Ms. Ellison and Mr. Wang on Wednesday. The S.E.C. said that Ms. Ellison, 28, had misused FTX customer deposits to fund Alameda’s trading activity and that Mr. Wang, 29, had created software that allowed that diversion of funds to take place. The S.E.C. case builds on civil charges filed against Mr. Bankman-Fried, 30, this month.

The guilty pleas and cooperation agreements are a major advance in the criminal fraud case against Mr. Bankman-Fried, who is in U.S. custody after agreeing to be extradited from the Bahamas earlier on Wednesday.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/21/tech ... pleas.html

IvanV
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2663
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 11:12 am

Re: FTX

Post by IvanV » Thu Dec 22, 2022 4:44 pm

Woodchopper wrote:
Thu Dec 22, 2022 4:05 am
Two former top executives of Sam Bankman-Fried’s crypto trading empire have pleaded guilty to federal criminal fraud charges and are cooperating in the case against the disgraced crypto entrepreneur, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York said on Wednesday night.

The two are Caroline Ellison, who was the chief executive of the cryptocurrency trading company Alameda Research, and Gary Wang, a founder of the FTX crypto exchange. They were key lieutenants in Mr. Bankman-Fried’s vast business empire, which rested primarily on FTX and Alameda, companies that he founded and ran.

The Securities and Exchange Commission also filed civil fraud charges against Ms. Ellison and Mr. Wang on Wednesday. The S.E.C. said that Ms. Ellison, 28, had misused FTX customer deposits to fund Alameda’s trading activity and that Mr. Wang, 29, had created software that allowed that diversion of funds to take place. The S.E.C. case builds on civil charges filed against Mr. Bankman-Fried, 30, this month.

The guilty pleas and cooperation agreements are a major advance in the criminal fraud case against Mr. Bankman-Fried, who is in U.S. custody after agreeing to be extradited from the Bahamas earlier on Wednesday.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/21/tech ... pleas.html
From a British perspective, it is unbelievable how quickly they make progress on this kind of thing. Nothing would happen for at least 7 years here.

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: FTX

Post by lpm » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:14 pm

Huh? Trumps first big money laundering deal was in 1984. That's 38 years of protection from prosecution.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

monkey
After Pie
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: FTX

Post by monkey » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:37 pm

It takes a lot longer when they don't plead guilty, and presumably don't take a plea deal. If that happens, prosecutors have to prove things.

IvanV
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2663
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 11:12 am

Re: FTX

Post by IvanV » Fri Dec 23, 2022 11:35 am

monkey wrote:
Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:37 pm
It takes a lot longer when they don't plead guilty, and presumably don't take a plea deal. If that happens, prosecutors have to prove things.
Indeed. But by British standards, it is amazing that a charge came that quickly.

And the US justice system does strongly encourage early guilty pleas. And that has its advantages, but also its unfairnesses. At times the plea bargain system in the US justice system can look more like an extortion racket than justice. Even the innocent may find it attractive plead guilty - some would say often - because cost of even a successful defence can be so larger in comparison to pleading guilty. It is somewhere between unlikely and impossible that you will be awarded the costs of your defence, even if cleared on all charges. It seems that the innocent are not held harmless against the march of the justice system.

WFJ
Catbabel
Posts: 648
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2021 7:54 am

Re: FTX

Post by WFJ » Fri Dec 23, 2022 12:18 pm

IvanV wrote:
Fri Dec 23, 2022 11:35 am
monkey wrote:
Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:37 pm
It takes a lot longer when they don't plead guilty, and presumably don't take a plea deal. If that happens, prosecutors have to prove things.
Indeed. But by British standards, it is amazing that a charge came that quickly.

And the US justice system does strongly encourage early guilty pleas. And that has its advantages, but also its unfairnesses. At times the plea bargain system in the US justice system can look more like an extortion racket than justice. Even the innocent may find it attractive plead guilty - some would say often - because cost of even a successful defence can be so larger in comparison to pleading guilty. It is somewhere between unlikely and impossible that you will be awarded the costs of your defence, even if cleared on all charges. It seems that the innocent are not held harmless against the march of the justice system.
You mean there are times where it doesn't?

Post Reply