UK v US graduate pay
-
Brightonian
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:16 pm
- Location: Usually UK, often France and Ireland
UK v US graduate pay
Interesting Burn-Murdoch thread on Twix: https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status ... 2933816529
Re: UK v US graduate pay
Is/are they suggesting that 60% of the workforce in London are graduates? I'd be surprised that that's the case.Brightonian wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 8:29 pmInteresting Burn-Murdoch thread on Twix: https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status ... 2933816529
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
Re: UK v US graduate pay
Are they suggesting that 60% of the workforce in London are graduates? Is that currently the case?Brightonian wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 8:29 pmInteresting Burn-Murdoch thread on Twix: https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status ... 2933816529
Though it may be that because of the expense of living in London, only well paid graduates can manage to exist there.
It would be interesting to see the relative poverty of the 40% of non graduates in London.
ETA If the 40% non graduates are managing on an average income that's only 70% of graduates, that's going to have a pretty harsh run-in.
Last edited by Gfamily on Sat Oct 28, 2023 8:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
-
Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 6887
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: UK v US graduate pay
Seems to be correct: https://www.bbc.com/news/education-25002401Gfamily wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 8:53 pmAre they suggesting that 60% of the workforce in London are graduates? Is that currently the case?Brightonian wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 8:29 pmInteresting Burn-Murdoch thread on Twix: https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status ... 2933816529
Though it may be that because of the expense of living in London, only well paid graduates can manage to exist there.
It would be interesting to see the relative poverty of the 40% of non graduates in London.
Re: UK v US graduate pay
If graduates are doing non-graduate jobs in London and still getting a salary boost, pity the poor non graduates doing the same jobs without the boost.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 8:55 pmSeems to be correct: https://www.bbc.com/news/education-25002401
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
Re: UK v US graduate pay
A thing on this topic, including some quotes from someone who may be familiar to members of the forum
Move-a… side, and let the mango through… let the mango through
Re: UK v US graduate pay
Wow, the one comment…nekomatic wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 1:30 pmA thing on this topic, including some quotes from someone who may be familiar to members of the forum
BTL I mean, not the quotes from the familiar name
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
-
FlammableFlower
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm
Re: UK v US graduate pay
Yeah. Someone has issues...