I am not sure that was exactly what I meant (assuming you were responding to my comment). Basically:
- Someone who has recently reached pension age gets £221.20 a week state pension. Such a person would not normally be entitled to pension credit, or to WFA.
- A single pensioner receiving pension credit gets their income topped up to £218.15 per week. They would be entitled to WFA, which is worth either £200 or £300 per year depending on their age (so £3.84 or £5.76 per week).
It is much more significantly different where the pensioner has other sources of income. These (normally) reduce pension credit payments. They make no difference to state pension payments.
So if the point you were making was that there isn't much difference between someone on pension credit and someone with a full state pension, but no other income, then that's correct.
But a more important takeaway from those figures is that it is not just the rich who are affected by the changes to WFA. I'll admit my first reaction to those changes was that they were a good thing, because the pensioners I find easiest to bring to mind are myself and Mrs. Snooze. We aren't exactly rich, but we aren't worried about keeping warm, and it seems wrong that we would get WFA when there are people of working age who are trying to work out whether to eat or heat their home. But Mrs. Snooze and I have other sources of income besides our state pensions. Someone whose only income was the state pension will be significantly affected by the removal of WFA, even if they get the full amount of state pension (and, as already mentioned, they aren't that much better off than someone who gets pension credit, and therefore does get WFA).