Archbishop of Canterbury

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Post Reply
User avatar
Tessa K
Light of Blast
Posts: 4897
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:07 pm
Location: Closer than you'd like

Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by Tessa K » Tue Nov 12, 2024 5:34 pm

Terrible excuses of our time:

'I thought the police were handling it ' is botth implausible and irresponsible.

Thou shalt not bear false witness, mate.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq6lzeel2e8o

User avatar
Trinucleus
Dorkwood
Posts: 1061
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by Trinucleus » Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:26 pm

If he did nothing to stop offending, isn't that perverting the course of justice?

User avatar
headshot
Dorkwood
Posts: 1524
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 9:40 am

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by headshot » Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:28 pm

Criminal conspiracy?

User avatar
Martin_B
After Pie
Posts: 1674
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:20 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by Martin_B » Tue Nov 12, 2024 9:03 pm

I'm always slightly surprised (I know, I probably shouldn't be at this stage!) when people who are supposed to provide moral leadership instead show little grasp of either.
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"

User avatar
Brightonian
Dorkwood
Posts: 1539
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:16 pm
Location: Usually UK, often France and Ireland

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by Brightonian » Tue Nov 12, 2024 9:23 pm

Interesting paragraph from Wikipedia page:
In July 2013, following the report of the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards, Welby explained that senior bank executives avoided being given information about difficult issues to allow them to "plead ignorance".[27] He also said he would possibly have behaved in the same way, and warned against punishing by naming and shaming individual bankers which he compared to the behaviour of a lynch mob.[27]

User avatar
sTeamTraen
After Pie
Posts: 2581
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by sTeamTraen » Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:50 pm

Martin_B wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2024 9:03 pm
I'm always slightly surprised (I know, I probably shouldn't be at this stage!) when people who are supposed to provide moral leadership instead show little grasp of either.
He is/was quite close to the Blessed Saint Paula of Vennells, apparently.
Something something hammer something something nail

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5572
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by jimbob » Wed Nov 13, 2024 8:42 am

If one wanted someone to represent the British establishment, he seems to epitomise its values
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
Boustrophedon
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2970
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
Location: Lincolnshire Wolds

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by Boustrophedon » Wed Nov 13, 2024 5:51 pm

As some of you may recall I watched the abuse in the C of E from an increasingly safe distance. I witnessed the abuse of friends within the Nine O'Clock service in Sheffield and then moved to Watford to teach, just as Soul Survivor was really getting going. I must have taught some of those kids.

I watched the rise of the Alpha course under Nicky Gumbel and Holy Trinity Brompton (HTB) and the increasing influence of the evangelical charismatic movement from 'mega churches' like St Thomas's Crookes in Sheffield, St Andrews Chorleywood and St Michael le Belfry York. The more I saw the more my hackles rose. I drifted 'up the candle' into Anglo Catholicism and eventually slid right off the top and out. Good music though.

It was not til I watched the submissions to the IICSA that I realised just how deep the abuse in the C of E went, I assumed it was to be mostly found in the Catholic church.

And framing all this was the IWERNE camps and the IWERNE trust which were designed to target and guide 'the best boys' from good public schools into the evangelical charismatic movement. In this they were successful. The main cause of Welby's resignation was the abuse by John Smyth at Iwerne. Both Welby and the homophobic Nicky Gumbel are products of the Iwerne camp system. So if you are looking for conspiracies it needs only to be noted that Welby and Smyth were exchanging Christmas cards til shortly before Smyth's death.
Perit hic laetatio.

Allo V Psycho
Catbabel
Posts: 780
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2019 8:18 am

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by Allo V Psycho » Wed Nov 13, 2024 6:48 pm

jimbob wrote:
Wed Nov 13, 2024 8:42 am
If one wanted someone to represent the British establishment, he seems to epitomise its values
Reading about this horrifying scandal, I discovered that the disgusting sadist John Smyth was the QC in Mary Whitehouse's successful (!) blasphemy case against Gay News, and he would have played the same role in the prosecution of Romans in Britain, but as his crimes became clear (and were covered up by the C of E) he pretended to have a viral illness.
I've tried really hard to resist the trope that those protesting about varied approaches to sexuality are secretly attracted by them, but...

I have to suggest a trigger warning - his crimes were so vile that I feel seriously disturbed by them, and I have lived a life which has fortunately been free of sexual abuse. if this is not the case for you, love and best wishes, and take great care.

As for Welby... and the racism of Smyth being exported to Africa... I for once do not have the words.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7400
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by Woodchopper » Thu Nov 14, 2024 9:18 am

Trinucleus wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:26 pm
If he did nothing to stop offending, isn't that perverting the course of justice?
It isn't. Perverting the course of justice requires that someone performs an action intended to interfere with an investigation or prosecution. Simply doing nothing doesn't reach that threshold.

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 5142
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by Grumble » Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:48 am

Moral leadership in action.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
Tessa K
Light of Blast
Posts: 4897
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:07 pm
Location: Closer than you'd like

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by Tessa K » Thu Nov 14, 2024 12:27 pm

It's a sin of omission not a sin of commission.

User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 8122
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by dyqik » Thu Nov 14, 2024 5:53 pm

Tessa K wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2024 12:27 pm
It's a sin of omission not a sin of commission.
Although within the realm of safeguarding, some sins of omission can be criminal offences.

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5572
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by jimbob » Fri Nov 15, 2024 2:14 pm

Boustrophedon wrote:
Wed Nov 13, 2024 5:51 pm
As some of you may recall I watched the abuse in the C of E from an increasingly safe distance. I witnessed the abuse of friends within the Nine O'Clock service in Sheffield and then moved to Watford to teach, just as Soul Survivor was really getting going. I must have taught some of those kids.

I watched the rise of the Alpha course under Nicky Gumbel and Holy Trinity Brompton (HTB) and the increasing influence of the evangelical charismatic movement from 'mega churches' like St Thomas's Crookes in Sheffield, St Andrews Chorleywood and St Michael le Belfry York. The more I saw the more my hackles rose. I drifted 'up the candle' into Anglo Catholicism and eventually slid right off the top and out. Good music though.

It was not til I watched the submissions to the IICSA that I realised just how deep the abuse in the C of E went, I assumed it was to be mostly found in the Catholic church.

And framing all this was the IWERNE camps and the IWERNE trust which were designed to target and guide 'the best boys' from good public schools into the evangelical charismatic movement. In this they were successful. The main cause of Welby's resignation was the abuse by John Smyth at Iwerne. Both Welby and the homophobic Nicky Gumbel are products of the Iwerne camp system. So if you are looking for conspiracies it needs only to be noted that Welby and Smyth were exchanging Christmas cards til shortly before Smyth's death.
I guess that evangelical churches often rely on charisma and they also (always?) push biblical literalism so you have to trust authority figures explaining why a talking snake isn't silly and why, not it was good to torment Job, but also that it was made fine by getting him "replacement" wives and children.

Obviously the explanation is that at in the culture of the time, those women and children weren't really proper people, unlike a patriarch.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

IvanV
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3071
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 11:12 am

Re: Archbishop of Canterbury

Post by IvanV » Fri Nov 15, 2024 4:57 pm

Now that this affair has taken the scalp of the sitting archbishop, the danger is that people will think, that's done then. The important thing is to actually go after the complacency, structures and attitudes that allow these things to continue and to fester. And doubtless there's a bunch of less prominent people who are guilty of that complacency, and who might think they have got away with it now the top guy has taken the fall for it, who are not keen for this to go any further.

Guardian article details several bishops who are, or should be, ashamed of themselves.

But the key observation is that everyone thought it was someone else's problem, and was insufficiently bothered to actually find out if that was actually true, and whether anything was being done about it. That happened both with the original 1982 report on it, and the later 2013 disclosure.

Stephen Conway, then Bishop of Ely, received disclosure in 2013. He passed it on to Welby, cc'ing Welby's then personal chaplain, Bailey Wells, now a Bishop herself. Conway thought that was all he had to do. He says he was under the impression that police had been informed, but does not tell us how he came to that incorrect conclusion. Bailey Wells told Welby he didn't need to do anything because Ely was dealing with it, and it had been reported to the police. But she had no basis for saying that. Also, Bailey Wells didn't think it was a big deal in the scale of these things. She saw disclosures at the rate of about 25 a year. Maybe she, and others, didn't think it was a big deal because it didn't, as far as anyone has alleged, involve sexual congress. So everyone thought someone else was doing something about it, and no one ever checked if there was any progress, and didn't think it was a big deal.

There was a report on it back in 1982, not published at the time. Former Archbishop George Carey temporarily lost his permission to officiate over his denial that he had ever seen that report, despite considerable evidence to the contrary. Three other former bishops, all now deceased, also evidently had knowledge of this, though they all seemed to have conveniently forgotten when probed on it. None of them seemed interested in finding out if anything was done about it. Some of them may indeed have considered, at the time, that sending the guy to Zimbabwe was a solution, but would not have wished to admit that later.

Post Reply