Google AI

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 5727
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Google AI

Post by Gfamily » Sat Feb 15, 2025 11:57 pm

Oh, ffs
So is this 100% wrong or 50% wrong?

But wrong
Oh no!.png
Oh no!.png (37.88 KiB) Viewed 1569 times
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

User avatar
Martin_B
After Pie
Posts: 1692
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:20 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Re: Google AI

Post by Martin_B » Sun Feb 16, 2025 12:46 am

Gfamily wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2025 11:57 pm
Oh, ffs
So is this 100% wrong or 50% wrong?

But wrong
Oh no!.png
I'd have said it's 100% wrong. It's stated one fact (half the area of the original triangle) and that is wrong.

The alternative is that separating a triangle like that produces an area which is 25% of the original triangle (if I'm understanding it correctly), so to claim that the answer is 50% of the original area, the AI answer is out by a factor of 2, or 100% over.

Either way, I wouldn't say it's 50% wrong! :)
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"

Post Reply