https://www.thedailybeast.com/elon-musk ... -the-chat/while attempting to show off Starlink’s in-flight WiFi capabilities while onboard his private jet over the weekend, Musk streamed himself playing some PoE2 on the hardest difficulty, which was broadcast live on X.
The DOGE chief was, predictably, terrible at the game, but that was the least of his problems—Less than five minutes into the stream, a player logged on and asked Musk if he could “please jerk off mr trump so he dies of a heart attack.” It only got worse from there.
For the next hour and a half, Musk sat in stony-faced silence and blasted techno music while dozens of users with names such as ELON_IS_A_PEEDOPHILE and ELON_MUSK_IS_PATHETIC repeatedly spammed the chat to tell him “YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND YOU WILL DIE ALONE” and “YOU WILL ALWAYS FEEL INSECURE AND IT WILL NEVER GO AWAY.”
“Elon. It’s me, Ashley St. Claire. I have no other means of contacting you so I bought PoE2 early access. Please pay your child support. Thank you Elon,” said an account pretending to be the conservative influencer currently locked in a custody battle with Musk over their five-month-old child, while another said his estranged daughter Vivian “was right” about him being terrible at video games.
[…]
“There’s a lot of r-----s in the chat,” said Musk at one point, using the r-word slur while a user named HC_John_Wick repeatedly spammed “ELON HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO LOOK THIS DUMB AND UGLY WHY IS UR TESLA COMPANY FALLING APART AHAAHAAHAAH! WHAT HAPPENED BUDDY?”
[…]
Eventually, he vanished when his WiFi connection abruptly cut out and ended the stream, which he later deleted from X but was swiftly reuploaded onto YouTube.
Trump 2.0
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7481
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: Trump 2.0
Re: Trump 2.0
See? Childish bullying is good actually!Woodchopper wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 5:37 amhttps://www.thedailybeast.com/elon-musk ... -the-chat/while attempting to show off Starlink’s in-flight WiFi capabilities while onboard his private jet over the weekend, Musk streamed himself playing some PoE2 on the hardest difficulty, which was broadcast live on X.
The DOGE chief was, predictably, terrible at the game, but that was the least of his problems—Less than five minutes into the stream, a player logged on and asked Musk if he could “please jerk off mr trump so he dies of a heart attack.” It only got worse from there.
For the next hour and a half, Musk sat in stony-faced silence and blasted techno music while dozens of users with names such as ELON_IS_A_PEEDOPHILE and ELON_MUSK_IS_PATHETIC repeatedly spammed the chat to tell him “YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND YOU WILL DIE ALONE” and “YOU WILL ALWAYS FEEL INSECURE AND IT WILL NEVER GO AWAY.”
“Elon. It’s me, Ashley St. Claire. I have no other means of contacting you so I bought PoE2 early access. Please pay your child support. Thank you Elon,” said an account pretending to be the conservative influencer currently locked in a custody battle with Musk over their five-month-old child, while another said his estranged daughter Vivian “was right” about him being terrible at video games.
[…]
“There’s a lot of r-----s in the chat,” said Musk at one point, using the r-word slur while a user named HC_John_Wick repeatedly spammed “ELON HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO LOOK THIS DUMB AND UGLY WHY IS UR TESLA COMPANY FALLING APART AHAAHAAHAAH! WHAT HAPPENED BUDDY?”
[…]
Eventually, he vanished when his WiFi connection abruptly cut out and ended the stream, which he later deleted from X but was swiftly reuploaded onto YouTube.
Re: Trump 2.0
So this "r-word slur". Is it Republicans? (Honestly, I don't know what it is.)
-
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1570
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm
Re: Trump 2.0
I believe it ends in a similar fashion to petard and custard and can be used as a synonym to reduce, impede or hamper...
Re: Trump 2.0
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
Re: Trump 2.0
I enjoyed that. Slightly more obliquely I also enjoyed the Midas episode of Podyssey, which starts and ends with Trump.
https://overcast.fm/+ABN4GeQAcCE
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
- Rich Scopie
- Catbabel
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:21 pm
Re: Trump 2.0
"Donald Trump is going to "make America's showers great again" by easing rules restricting water flow, the White House says."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2eeggyppzo
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2eeggyppzo
It first was a rumour dismissed as a lie, but then came the evidence none could deny:
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!
Re: Trump 2.0
A new golden era?Rich Scopie wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 3:45 pm"Donald Trump is going to "make America's showers great again" by easing rules restricting water flow, the White House says."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2eeggyppzo
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
- Tessa K
- Light of Blast
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:07 pm
- Location: Closer than you'd like
Re: Trump 2.0
Gfamily wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 4:10 pmA new golden era?Rich Scopie wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 3:45 pm"Donald Trump is going to "make America's showers great again" by easing rules restricting water flow, the White House says."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2eeggyppzo

Re: Trump 2.0
He released all that water from Northern California or Canada or wherever it was, and now he'll do the same with showers. Make Americans wet again. What could go wrong?
Re: Trump 2.0
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly22xm8kx1o
British bloke finds his tattoo (of his daughter's birth date and time) used on the ICE website as an example of a Venezuelan gang tattoo.
British bloke finds his tattoo (of his daughter's birth date and time) used on the ICE website as an example of a Venezuelan gang tattoo.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
-
- Catbabel
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:05 am
Re: Trump 2.0
Trump has finally turned his Cabinet Meetings into an imitation of Kim Jong Un's.
Here grows much rhubarb.
-
- Catbabel
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:05 am
Re: Trump 2.0
Trump tried this with toilets in his first term, presumably because he was having a hard time making his dumps go away.Rich Scopie wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 3:45 pm"Donald Trump is going to "make America's showers great again" by easing rules restricting water flow, the White House says."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2eeggyppzo
Here grows much rhubarb.
- Brightonian
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:16 pm
- Location: Usually UK, often France and Ireland
Re: Trump 2.0
State Department orders employees to denounce colleagues for any "anti-Christian bias":
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/1 ... ias-033535
Wonder if some will get their denouncements in first to avoid being sent to the El Salvador gulag.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/1 ... ias-033535
Wonder if some will get their denouncements in first to avoid being sent to the El Salvador gulag.
Re: Trump 2.0
I wonder if the form is available for anyone to fill inBrightonian wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 6:09 pmState Department orders employees to denounce colleagues for any "anti-Christian bias":
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/1 ... ias-033535
Wonder if some will get their denouncements in first to avoid being sent to the El Salvador gulag.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
Re: Trump 2.0
Oh, nearly forgot with all the other news, how's 'his' ceasefire in Ukraine going?
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
Re: Trump 2.0
Man with valid working visa deported after returning to the US from an overseas trip to scatter his sister's ashes. Called "retarded" in the process and told "Trump is back in town; we’re doing things the way we should have always been doing them."
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... d-deported
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... d-deported
Re: Trump 2.0
Tourism from Europe has dropped a bit. Considering valid working visas don’t guarantee entry I think this will go down a bit further even.bjn wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 7:54 pmMan with valid working visa deported after returning to the US from an overseas trip to scatter his sister's ashes. Called "retarded" in the process and told "Trump is back in town; we’re doing things the way we should have always been doing them."
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... d-deported
https://bsky.app/profile/jburnmurdoch.f ... kphoheqc27
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
Re: Trump 2.0
The SAVE act has passed in the House without any safeguards.
The act will require US citizens to register to vote in person by presenting their ID along with a birth certificate, passport or other form of ID that proves citizenship. It does not include proof of name change or a marriage certificate as acceptable proof of identity, meaning that it's going to be a lot harder for married women - and anyone else who has changed their name - to vote. Plus the requirement to register in person will likely disenfranchise people who live in remote areas, poor people, disabled people, elderly people and those who live or work overseas.
And if you think this was an oversight, Republicans blocked an amendment that would safeguard against this problem.
The act will require US citizens to register to vote in person by presenting their ID along with a birth certificate, passport or other form of ID that proves citizenship. It does not include proof of name change or a marriage certificate as acceptable proof of identity, meaning that it's going to be a lot harder for married women - and anyone else who has changed their name - to vote. Plus the requirement to register in person will likely disenfranchise people who live in remote areas, poor people, disabled people, elderly people and those who live or work overseas.
And if you think this was an oversight, Republicans blocked an amendment that would safeguard against this problem.
it's okay to say "I don't know"
Re: Trump 2.0
https://open.substack.com/pub/deanblund ... medium=web
How Canada played a key role in forcing Trump to back down
How Canada played a key role in forcing Trump to back down
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
Re: Trump 2.0
Do you think this might backfire on them? Thinking of the situation here where Rees-Mogg admitted that voter ID requirements hit Tory voters more than they expected.Fishnut wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 9:11 pmThe SAVE act has passed in the House without any safeguards.
The act will require US citizens to register to vote in person by presenting their ID along with a birth certificate, passport or other form of ID that proves citizenship. It does not include proof of name change or a marriage certificate as acceptable proof of identity, meaning that it's going to be a lot harder for married women - and anyone else who has changed their name - to vote. Plus the requirement to register in person will likely disenfranchise people who live in remote areas, poor people, disabled people, elderly people and those who live or work overseas.
And if you think this was an oversight, Republicans blocked an amendment that would safeguard against this problem.
Re: Trump 2.0
No, but only because I don't think we'll be seeing free and fair elections in the US for the foreseeable future. Trump has already used the Alien Enemies Act (only supposed to be used in wartime, and last used in WW2 to intern Japanese Americans) to deport people to El Salvador. By the time the midterms come I think the US will be far closer to Russia or Turkey in the validity of its elections than the UK. By the time of the next presidential election I can see the 22nd amendment being repealed and the Insurrection Act invoked.gosling wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 7:16 amDo you think this might backfire on them? Thinking of the situation here where Rees-Mogg admitted that voter ID requirements hit Tory voters more than they expected.Fishnut wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 9:11 pmThe SAVE act has passed in the House without any safeguards.
...
A podcast I listen to likened Trump's strategy to the T Rex in Jurassic Park testing the fences and it feels an apt description. He's seeing what he can get away with and so far it's everything. The courts aren't doing anything meaningful to stop him because they know they can't but all least by going along with him they are able to pretend they still have authority. There may come a time when he goes too far even for the Supreme Court but then what? He'll do whatever the hell he wants anyway and the court will be powerless to stop him. In his first term he showed that much of what people think were rules were really just conventions, and that even if you break the rules people will do little more than huff and say "you can't do that!". And instead of recognising this and building in restraints to prevent a repeat, everyone just seemed to sigh with relief when Biden got in and assumed that things were back to normal.
Trump's now back, with an actual plan this time, and he knows there's no-one who can stop him. Protests and fake filibusters aren't going to fix this. I don't know where the future leads but it's looking rather scary right now.
it's okay to say "I don't know"
Re: Trump 2.0
Yup, it's bad when my greatest hope is that he eats the wrong faces too soon. Not his base, but the minor functionaries who would need to implement things on the ground, and who might find themselves noticeably worse off in ways that they link to Trump.Fishnut wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 9:21 pmNo, but only because I don't think we'll be seeing free and fair elections in the US for the foreseeable future. Trump has already used the Alien Enemies Act (only supposed to be used in wartime, and last used in WW2 to intern Japanese Americans) to deport people to El Salvador. By the time the midterms come I think the US will be far closer to Russia or Turkey in the validity of its elections than the UK. By the time of the next presidential election I can see the 22nd amendment being repealed and the Insurrection Act invoked.gosling wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 7:16 amDo you think this might backfire on them? Thinking of the situation here where Rees-Mogg admitted that voter ID requirements hit Tory voters more than they expected.Fishnut wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 9:11 pmThe SAVE act has passed in the House without any safeguards.
...
A podcast I listen to likened Trump's strategy to the T Rex in Jurassic Park testing the fences and it feels an apt description. He's seeing what he can get away with and so far it's everything. The courts aren't doing anything meaningful to stop him because they know they can't but all least by going along with him they are able to pretend they still have authority. There may come a time when he goes too far even for the Supreme Court but then what? He'll do whatever the hell he wants anyway and the court will be powerless to stop him. In his first term he showed that much of what people think were rules were really just conventions, and that even if you break the rules people will do little more than huff and say "you can't do that!". And instead of recognising this and building in restraints to prevent a repeat, everyone just seemed to sigh with relief when Biden got in and assumed that things were back to normal.
Trump's now back, with an actual plan this time, and he knows there's no-one who can stop him. Protests and fake filibusters aren't going to fix this. I don't know where the future leads but it's looking rather scary right now.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
Re: Trump 2.0
I wish people would actually read the Constitution before commenting on it.
The only way that the 22nd Amendment can be repealed is via a vote of 2/3rds of Congress, and then ratification by 3/4 of the States. That's not possible before 2028, because more than 1/4 of States are Democrat controlled.
Similarly, all talk about cancelling elections is raging gibberish. Elections happen on a Constitutionally determined timescale. If they don't take place, then Trump doesn't get any new laws and no budget to operate the government.
Elections not being fair is another matter, but elections are run by the States, not by the Federal government.