Should Scotland be independent?

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
User avatar
sTeamTraen
Dorkwood
Posts: 1171
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Re: Should Scotland be independent?

Post by sTeamTraen » Thu Nov 19, 2020 8:20 pm

Bird on a Fire wrote:
Thu Nov 19, 2020 8:14 pm
Does EU accession operate with a queuing system, then?

I assumed the reasons why places like Turkey and Serbia hadn't been let in the club yet were related to genuine differences in alignment, and that another country could accede before any of them assuming those differences in alignment were rectified. If Scotland had only been out of the EU for a year or two I reckon there are limits to how much disalignment the Westminster government could force on Scotland to make accession more difficult than for Montenegro. Is there any reason to suggest queue-jumping couldn't happen?
I think it's a queuing system with a certain maximum speed of progression through it, but like the queue at the post office, if you get halfway along and find you left your wallet at home, you have to leave and when you come back in you may well have lost your spot. The point is rather that you can't show up on day 1 and get fast-tracked because until 3 years ago you were part of the EU as a region of another member state. So if Montenegro is at stage 3 out of 7 when Scotland applies, Montenegro will accede first unless something goes wrong. Turkey has been on the periphery of membership for 25 or more years and nobody thinks it's going to happen soon, nor will it stop other countries from joining ahead of them.
Something something hammer something something nail

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Light of Blast
Posts: 4276
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: nadir of brie

Re: Should Scotland be independent?

Post by Bird on a Fire » Thu Nov 19, 2020 8:34 pm

But why can't you? Is that hard-coded in law or just an apparent convention because it hasn't happened before?

It seems enormously likely that there's much less legal work to be done when you know that until a few years ago the country's laws were all in alignment. It means you only have to look at how three years' of subsequent legislation affects things, rather than all of it. So I'd imagine it would be entirely possible for that process to be fast-tracked in practical terms, because there's way less to negotiate (especially if Scotland considered EU membership an important part of its identity, perhaps featuring it prominently in the independence referendum campaign, so they could basically just say yes to everything the EU wanted in the "negotiations"). It would just depend on whether they wanted to do that politically or economically. It would be a massive f.ck-you to rUK at a time when it'll still be mired in recession under the incompetent and offensive premiership of Boris Johnson, for example.
THINK BIG AND UPEND THE SYSTEM

#ShowYourStripes

User avatar
snoozeofreason
Clardic Fug
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:22 pm

Re: Should Scotland be independent?

Post by snoozeofreason » Thu Nov 19, 2020 9:28 pm

Bird on a Fire wrote:
Thu Nov 19, 2020 8:14 pm
Does EU accession operate with a queuing system, then?
There's no queuing system in the sense of one country being permanently ahead of another, and there's no reason in principle why Scotland's accession couldn't be accelerated. But that could only happen if most of the existing EU countries were actively enthusiastic about an accelerated process. So far as I can see, none have said they are (and some have indicated that they aren't).
In six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them. The human body was knocked up pretty late on the Friday afternoon, with a deadline looming. How well do you expect it to work?

Post Reply