General Election 2019
- Trinucleus
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
Re: General Election 2019
There's a Tory MP within Rotherham district. Rotherham.
I hope he'll be arguing for more funds for his local authority.
Interesting looking at the vote share. A little swing to Tories, but basically an 8% drop in the Labour vote
I hope he'll be arguing for more funds for his local authority.
Interesting looking at the vote share. A little swing to Tories, but basically an 8% drop in the Labour vote
- discovolante
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4099
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm
Re: General Election 2019
It's so frustrating to see the Tory seats where the Labour plus Lib Dem votes add up to more than the Tory vote.
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.
- GeenDienst
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:10 am
Re: General Election 2019
Was interviewed by the police.
"Why are your gang stealing maps?"
"Because we arrrrrrrrrrrr"
Just tell 'em I'm broke and don't come round here no more.
- Pucksoppet
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:13 pm
- Location: Girdling the Earth
Re: General Election 2019
And after all that
After 650 of 650 seats declared, according to BBC website
Share of vote:
Conservative - 43.6%
Democratic Unionist Party - 0.8%
The Brexit Party - 2.0%
Ulster Unionist Party - 0.3%
UKIP - 0.1%
Total: 46.8%
Labour - 32.1%
Scottish National Party - 3.9%
Liberal Democrat - 11.5%
Social Democratic & Labour Party 0.4%
Green Party - 3.0%
Alliance Party - 0.4%
Total: 51.3%
By my reckoning*, the first lot are pro-Brexit, and the second lot broadly anti, despite fence sitting tactics - and, if nothing else, very much against a 'hard' Brexit - and a result that is broadly the opposite of the referendum.
Not that it means much.
There really ought to be a better way of making decisions, dealing with polarising questions, and reflecting the very small margin that this issue is being decided by. But we missed the opportunity to change from a FPTP system. Sigh.
*which has no good methodology to support it.
After 650 of 650 seats declared, according to BBC website
Share of vote:
Conservative - 43.6%
Democratic Unionist Party - 0.8%
The Brexit Party - 2.0%
Ulster Unionist Party - 0.3%
UKIP - 0.1%
Total: 46.8%
Labour - 32.1%
Scottish National Party - 3.9%
Liberal Democrat - 11.5%
Social Democratic & Labour Party 0.4%
Green Party - 3.0%
Alliance Party - 0.4%
Total: 51.3%
By my reckoning*, the first lot are pro-Brexit, and the second lot broadly anti, despite fence sitting tactics - and, if nothing else, very much against a 'hard' Brexit - and a result that is broadly the opposite of the referendum.
Not that it means much.
There really ought to be a better way of making decisions, dealing with polarising questions, and reflecting the very small margin that this issue is being decided by. But we missed the opportunity to change from a FPTP system. Sigh.
*which has no good methodology to support it.
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: General Election 2019
Im starting to think that democracy doesnt work.
Masking forever
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
- GeenDienst
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:10 am
Re: General Election 2019
I don't buy the Labour leadership being anti-Brexit at all (the membership were, not that it matters now). And their supposed negotiating strategy would end up no different to where we are now.
Just tell 'em I'm broke and don't come round here no more.
-
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm
Re: General Election 2019
Exactly what happened in the constituency I'm in. The incumbent Tory lost 3% on last year, but whilst Labour did increase its share a little, the majority of the gains were Lib dem votes...discovolante wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:57 pmIt's so frustrating to see the Tory seats where the Labour plus Lib Dem votes add up to more than the Tory vote.
Re: General Election 2019
We'd have to try it first to see.
- El Pollo Diablo
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
- Location: FBPE
Re: General Election 2019
Dave West is an idiot.Greengrocer Dave West voted Conservative, despite voting remain in the referendum and expecting his business costs to rise if Britain leaves the EU.
...
I don't want to leave the EU because my lorry drivers will be in queues and much of my produce is from Spain and France, but I still voted Conservative because of everything else.
My decision was based on local issues.
The people of Leigh, everybody.Gail Robinson, who runs a delicatessen stall, was also influenced by local issues and said she was proud to have ticked the Tory box for the first time.
The 46-year-old said she "didn't want Labour in anymore".
"All the funding just goes to Wigan. The MP talked a lot of gibberish.
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued
- Stephanie
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 2902
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:38 pm
- Location: clinging tenaciously to your buttocks
Re: General Election 2019
Ashcroft poll results https://www.conservativehome.com/platfo ... -poll.html
"I got a flu virus named after me 'cause I kissed a bat on a dare."
Re: General Election 2019
Five hundred odd votes in the High Peak.discovolante wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:57 pmIt's so frustrating to see the Tory seats where the Labour plus Lib Dem votes add up to more than the Tory vote.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: General Election 2019
There was the one from Wrexham which went something along the lines of "after 10 years of austerity everything in Wrexham is f.cked so I voted Tory for the first time because we need a change!".El Pollo Diablo wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 7:55 amDave West is an idiot.Greengrocer Dave West voted Conservative, despite voting remain in the referendum and expecting his business costs to rise if Britain leaves the EU.
...
I don't want to leave the EU because my lorry drivers will be in queues and much of my produce is from Spain and France, but I still voted Conservative because of everything else.
My decision was based on local issues.
The people of Leigh, everybody.Gail Robinson, who runs a delicatessen stall, was also influenced by local issues and said she was proud to have ticked the Tory box for the first time.
The 46-year-old said she "didn't want Labour in anymore".
"All the funding just goes to Wigan. The MP talked a lot of gibberish.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
Re: General Election 2019
Awwwwwww, that nice Tim Martin - y'know, the one who was on PM the other evening, telling Wayne Hemingway that inequality doesn't actually exist and that people aren't really living in poverty, that one - is suddenly a whole lot richer.
Isn't that a nice piece of news? Warms yer cockles, makes yer proud to be English?
Isn't that a nice piece of news? Warms yer cockles, makes yer proud to be English?
It's so much more attractive inside the moral kiosk
- Pucksoppet
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:13 pm
- Location: Girdling the Earth
Re: General Election 2019
Interesting reading - thank you Stephanie.Stephanie wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 8:51 amAshcroft poll results https://www.conservativehome.com/platfo ... -poll.html
So Labour beat the Conservatives in the votes of people in the age range 18-44, but were very unpopular for those older than 65. And social class C2 voted pro Conservative significantly more than the average.
These groups are voting in what they see as either their best interests, or what they believe are the best interests of the country as a whole (some people try to be altruistic). It might be useful to find out what those beliefs are, and whether they are reasonable or able to be modified in reasonable (to both parties) discourse.
- snoozeofreason
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:22 pm
Re: General Election 2019
True but OTOH it's probably a mistake to imagine that if one of those candidates had stood aside, all of their votes would have gone to the other.discovolante wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:57 pmIt's so frustrating to see the Tory seats where the Labour plus Lib Dem votes add up to more than the Tory vote.
In the fullness of time we should have data from the British Election Study that will allow us to do the thought experiment of imagining what would happen if the Lib Dems were not standing. In past elections it would have made much less difference than you would think if you imagined the Lib Dems as splitting an "anti-tory" vote, but I suppose it might not have worked out that way this time round.
In six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them. The human body was knocked up pretty late on the Friday afternoon, with a deadline looming. How well do you expect it to work?
- discovolante
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4099
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm
Re: General Election 2019
I did think that, and I suppose it is a bit pointless to speculate too much for now, but on the other hand if the lib dems had done that it would have potentially cast the election in a different light to those who bother to pay attention to these things.snoozeofreason wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 11:07 amTrue but OTOH it's probably a mistake to imagine that if one of those candidates had stood aside, all of their votes would have gone to the other.discovolante wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:57 pmIt's so frustrating to see the Tory seats where the Labour plus Lib Dem votes add up to more than the Tory vote.
In the fullness of time we should have data from the British Election Study that will allow us to do the thought experiment of imagining what would happen if the Lib Dems were not standing. In past elections it would have made much less difference than you would think if you imagined the Lib Dems as splitting an "anti-tory" vote, but I suppose it might not have worked out that way this time round.
Anyway it wouldnt have affected the tory majority, but it could have been a bit smaller.
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.
Re: General Election 2019
Here's the number of votes it took for each party to get an MP elected:
Edit: that's slightly out of date, I think there was 1 seat left to declare at the time.
Code: Select all
Party Votes Seats k Votes per Seat
SNP 1242380 48 26
SF 181853 7 26
DUP 244127 8 31
Con 13941086 364 38
Plaid 153265 4 38
Lab 10292354 203 51
SDLP 118737 2 59
AP 134115 1 134
LD 3675342 11 334
BP 642323 0 >642
Green 864743 1 865
Last edited by TimW on Sat Dec 14, 2019 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: General Election 2019
Or millions of voters are f.cking morons and aren't worth asking, because their voting was even more irrational than their votes on moron-shows like I'm a Celebrity and Strictly.Pucksoppet wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 10:55 amThese groups are voting in what they see as either their best interests, or what they believe are the best interests of the country as a whole (some people try to be altruistic). It might be useful to find out what those beliefs are, and whether they are reasonable or able to be modified in reasonable (to both parties) discourse.
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
- snoozeofreason
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:22 pm
Re: General Election 2019
I am particularly annoyed by the Lib Dems in my constituency. Right through the campaign they were sending us leaflets suggesting that they were the only party that could beat the Tories, and that Labour would come nowhere. All the evidence suggested that it was the other way round, and the eventual result bore that out. The Labour candidate ran a good campaign (in the sense that his vote ended up being pretty identical to the one Labour got in the 2017 GE). It would be an exaggeration to say that he was within reach of unseating the Tory incumbent, but he did come a close second. The Lib Dems ended up in a very distant third place.
In six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them. The human body was knocked up pretty late on the Friday afternoon, with a deadline looming. How well do you expect it to work?
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8267
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: General Election 2019
The sad thing is that the Lib Dems probably sincerely believed their own b.llsh.t and found ways to twist the data to fit, to reduce the cognitive dissonance.snoozeofreason wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 11:35 amI am particularly annoyed by the Lib Dems in my constituency. Right through the campaign they were sending us leaflets suggesting that they were the only party that could beat the Tories, and that Labour would come nowhere. All the evidence suggested that it was the other way round, and the eventual result bore that out. The Labour candidate ran a good campaign (in the sense that his vote ended up being pretty identical to the one Labour got in the 2017 GE). It would be an exaggeration to say that he was within reach of unseating the Tory incumbent, but he did come a close second. The Lib Dems ended up in a very distant third place.
Actually no the sad thing is that people have clearly voted for sh.t things to get even shitter.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
Re: General Election 2019
Most of these LibDems would have voted Conservative or not voted if there was no LibDem choice. There was such opposition to Labour that some LibDem-leaners voted Conservatives out of fear of a Corbyn victory.
Labour hurt LibDem votes by much more than LibDem hurt Labour. At some point I'll prove it with a list of southern constituencies where LibDem came second and the Tory won with <50%.
Labour hurt LibDem votes by much more than LibDem hurt Labour. At some point I'll prove it with a list of southern constituencies where LibDem came second and the Tory won with <50%.
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
Re: General Election 2019
First one I tried, Sutton & Cheam.
Conservative 25,235 = 50.0%
LD + Labour + Green 25,252 = 50.0%
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/con ... /E14000984
The Remain Alliance failed because Corbyn & Co refused to play any part, while LD and Green wanted to work with Labour and tried a partial alliance between themselves (and PC).
Conservative 25,235 = 50.0%
LD + Labour + Green 25,252 = 50.0%
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/con ... /E14000984
The Remain Alliance failed because Corbyn & Co refused to play any part, while LD and Green wanted to work with Labour and tried a partial alliance between themselves (and PC).
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
Re: General Election 2019
Winchester: Conservative won by 985 votes, Labour "wasted" 2,723.
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
Re: General Election 2019
Esher and Walton, won by Dominic Raab with majority of 2,743.
Labour vote 2,838.
Do me a favour, would you? Next time you hear someone talking shite about Corbyn losing because of LibDems, tell them to f.ck off.
Labour vote 2,838.
Do me a favour, would you? Next time you hear someone talking shite about Corbyn losing because of LibDems, tell them to f.ck off.
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
- GeenDienst
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:10 am
Re: General Election 2019
No, it is mendacious lying, based on the one off result of the Euro election. They used them all over the country.shpalman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 11:39 amThe sad thing is that the Lib Dems probably sincerely believed their own b.llsh.t and found ways to twist the data to fit, to reduce the cognitive dissonance.snoozeofreason wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 11:35 amI am particularly annoyed by the Lib Dems in my constituency. Right through the campaign they were sending us leaflets suggesting that they were the only party that could beat the Tories, and that Labour would come nowhere. All the evidence suggested that it was the other way round, and the eventual result bore that out. The Labour candidate ran a good campaign (in the sense that his vote ended up being pretty identical to the one Labour got in the 2017 GE). It would be an exaggeration to say that he was within reach of unseating the Tory incumbent, but he did come a close second. The Lib Dems ended up in a very distant third place.
Actually no the sad thing is that people have clearly voted for sh.t things to get even shitter.
But why do people seem to assume it's wrong somehow for them to stand against Labour. They are a national party campaigning on their own manifesto. Anyway Corbyn et al made very sure any kind of progressive alliance was a non starter.
Just tell 'em I'm broke and don't come round here no more.