Trump Impeachment
- Vertigowooyay
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:25 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment
When you’re that rich, surely you can afford better fake tan than from Poundland?
Calm yourself Doctor NotTheNineO’ClockNews. We’re men of science. We fear no worldly terrors.
Re: Trump Impeachment
It's pretty obvious he keeps being a c.nt to his make up artists and valets - they continually let him walk out the door looking like a demented old man.
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
-
- Stargoon
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:36 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment
It's overspill from the sh.t eating grin.Vertigowooyay wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 11:02 amWhen you’re that rich, surely you can afford better fake tan than from Poundland?
2C975E6F-1483-40EC-8E04-DAD7887686B4.jpeg
Re: Trump Impeachment
More speech for your observations about his mental decline:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UE9BXkQ-SRc
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
Re: Trump Impeachment
They are running a little competition back stage - who can send him out with the most ludicrous make-up without him knowing.
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
Re: Trump Impeachment
https://twitter.com/TomJChicago/status/ ... 76352?s=20
talking about that photo in particular
Trump’s list of dementia symptoms include grooming issues. The costumey effect of caking on makeup is common w/ patients. It’s uncommon to be in public creating a spectacle w/ one’s appearance. His family is a disgrace. (Confirmed this photo was real b4 unloading). It gets worse.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
- Vertigowooyay
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:25 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment
Calm yourself Doctor NotTheNineO’ClockNews. We’re men of science. We fear no worldly terrors.
Re: Trump Impeachment
Watch for the shoulder twitch at about 2 seconds in:
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1208881761855397888
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1208881761855397888
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
- discovolante
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4115
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment
He mainly just seems to be speaking to his own audience there though. He makes a joke about orange being his favourite colour ffs.
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.
- Vertigowooyay
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:25 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment
Well, it is the new black. In a perfect world.discovolante wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 9:22 pmHe mainly just seems to be speaking to his own audience there though. He makes a joke about orange being his favourite colour ffs.
Calm yourself Doctor NotTheNineO’ClockNews. We’re men of science. We fear no worldly terrors.
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment
https://medium.com/@SamMcKenzieJr/the-c ... 138bc2fecaTrump is a white demagogue. It’s ineffective to impeach a white demagogue by colorblindness because colorblindness further entrenches whiteness, and that is pathetic.
I was having similar thoughts, but I am not as eloquent as this author.
Masking forever
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
- GeenDienst
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:10 am
Re: Trump Impeachment
I got this far...Herainestold wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 11:05 pmhttps://medium.com/@SamMcKenzieJr/the-c ... 138bc2fecaTrump is a white demagogue. It’s ineffective to impeach a white demagogue by colorblindness because colorblindness further entrenches whiteness, and that is pathetic.
I was having similar thoughts, but I am not as eloquent as this author.
...before calling bollocks on it and giving up. And that's the start of the second paragraph.There’s no way to impeach Trump without impeaching whiteness because Trump is thoroughly white
Just tell 'em I'm broke and don't come round here no more.
Re: Trump Impeachment
The Guardian illustration of Trump at the charge against windmills is manifestly wrong: He was wielding a golf club, not a spear. And riding a cart not an old-fashioned horse.Vertigowooyay wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:27 pmhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... SApp_Other
EB9AD03C-F783-4643-AFFD-3EFC9A64C05D.png
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment
The Trump presidency is the culmination of the white supremacy and whiteness that is one of the ordering principles of American society and always has been. It was brushed under the rug during the Obama administration but it has since reared its ugly head.GeenDienst wrote: ↑Tue Dec 24, 2019 9:07 amI got this far...Herainestold wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 11:05 pmhttps://medium.com/@SamMcKenzieJr/the-c ... 138bc2fecaTrump is a white demagogue. It’s ineffective to impeach a white demagogue by colorblindness because colorblindness further entrenches whiteness, and that is pathetic.
I was having similar thoughts, but I am not as eloquent as this author.
...before calling bollocks on it and giving up. And that's the start of the second paragraph.There’s no way to impeach Trump without impeaching whiteness because Trump is thoroughly white
Impeachment is actually aiding Trumps popularity as threatened white supremacists rally to the flag of their leader.He is very likely to to be re-elected.
The silver lining is that that the foolish and incompetent Trump government, is quickly reducing Americas power, prestige and influence in the rest of the world. The biggest imperialist colonialist country is on the decline and the countries of the world are able to come in to their own. Good luck to them.
Masking forever
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
- GeenDienst
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:10 am
Re: Trump Impeachment
Still bollocks. For all the crimes committed on blacks and other races, being white is not a breach of the US constitution. And Trumpy is not being impeached for furthring the cause of white nativism.
Just tell 'em I'm broke and don't come round here no more.
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment
The acts that Trump is being impeached for resulted from a white supremacist belief that no matter what he did, his whiteness would protect him. And he is correct. It is going to protect him.GeenDienst wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2019 10:33 amStill bollocks. For all the crimes committed on blacks and other races, being white is not a breach of the US constitution. And Trumpy is not being impeached for furthring the cause of white nativism.
Masking forever
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
- GeenDienst
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:10 am
Re: Trump Impeachment
Even more bollocks. His actions stem from him being a c.nt, and the protection his senators give him has f.ck all to do with white supremacy. Come up with an impeachment charge that involves white supremacy, orgive it the f.ck up. This racial guilt trip stuff is simply crap. Trump is being impeached, or I missed Pelosi's charges againt the entire white population.
Just tell 'em I'm broke and don't come round here no more.
Re: Trump Impeachment
"impeachment by colorblindness" ffs. There is a point at the heart of it somewhere, but it really needs thinking through and aiming at the right targets. And as a colourblind person, I find the use of the term when discussing things related to race mildly annoying. Not offensive, just mildly annoying.Herainestold wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 11:05 pmhttps://medium.com/@SamMcKenzieJr/the-c ... 138bc2fecaTrump is a white demagogue. It’s ineffective to impeach a white demagogue by colorblindness because colorblindness further entrenches whiteness, and that is pathetic.
I was having similar thoughts, but I am not as eloquent as this author.
-
- Stargoon
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:36 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment
Plus it was an offshore, electricity generating windmill in Scotland.bmforre wrote: ↑Tue Dec 24, 2019 9:16 amThe Guardian illustration of Trump at the charge against windmills is manifestly wrong: He was wielding a golf club, not a spear. And riding a cart not an old-fashioned horse.Vertigowooyay wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:27 pmhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... SApp_Other
EB9AD03C-F783-4643-AFFD-3EFC9A64C05D.png
- GeenDienst
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:10 am
Re: Trump Impeachment
So the acquittal is going to start next week.
Meanwhile...
Meanwhile...
The irony is that Trump is now impatient for his own Senate trial to start, which he reasonably expects will bring the public more to his side. During the House’s impeachment proceedings, Trump’s approval ratings rose six points.
Just tell 'em I'm broke and don't come round here no more.
Re: Trump Impeachment
That's massively confounded by the holiday period in the US though, when it gets even harder than usual for pollsters to reach people with jobs and who travel. It's also not true according to the 538 averages.GeenDienst wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2020 7:10 pmSo the acquittal is going to start next week.
Meanwhile...
The irony is that Trump is now impatient for his own Senate trial to start, which he reasonably expects will bring the public more to his side. During the House’s impeachment proceedings, Trump’s approval ratings rose six points.
Trump's approval rating today is 41.9%. The highest it's been in the past two months is 43.8%. In May, it was 41.9%. It's been within 2.5 percent of 41.5% since the end of the shutdown in January 2019.
Re: Trump Impeachment
It's weird that there's such a widespread view that it's all simple - Trump will be acquitted and that's that. Particularly in the sh.t BBC coverage and other UK media.GeenDienst wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2020 7:10 pmSo the acquittal is going to start next week.
Meanwhile...
The irony is that Trump is now impatient for his own Senate trial to start, which he reasonably expects will bring the public more to his side. During the House’s impeachment proceedings, Trump’s approval ratings rose six points.
It's complex with loads of unknown variables.
- do Mitt Romney and Susan Collins side with the Democrats for a proper trial? It only takes 4 Republicans - how much sway does Romney have?
- how does Chief Justice John Roberts to the false oaths and a faked trial?
- what other cards does Pelosi have to play in a faked trial?
- is there something partial between a genuine trial and a faked trial?
- how does Murdoch play it?
- how will public opinion change in a faked trial?
- in a genuine trial, how resolute can Senators be in voting to acquit given how straightforward the crimes and evidence are?
Behind all of it is the question of Trump's health: will Republicans decide to fight 2020 with President Pence instead of clinging on to a mad f.cker with dementia? Do they risk the Senate 2020 fight simply to protect someone they know is a criminal and personally hate, and who might fall or be confused in public?
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
- GeenDienst
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:10 am
Re: Trump Impeachment
You are aware that it needs a 2/3 supermajority to remove him, aren't you?
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/24/what-it ... trump.htmlThe Senate now has 53 Republicans, 45 Democrats and two independents who usually vote with the Democrats. Conviction and removal of a president would require 67 votes. So, for Trump to be removed from office via impeachment, at least 20 Republicans and all the Democrats and independents would have to vote against him.
Just tell 'em I'm broke and don't come round here no more.
Re: Trump Impeachment
It takes a supermajority to convict. The procedures for the trial are Senate rules and only have to be approved by a simple majority.
Re: Trump Impeachment
Majorities have a tendency to appear suddenly as members of a party try to project unity, and because of groupthink.GeenDienst wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 3:40 pmYou are aware that it needs a 2/3 supermajority to remove him, aren't you?
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/24/what-it ... trump.htmlThe Senate now has 53 Republicans, 45 Democrats and two independents who usually vote with the Democrats. Conviction and removal of a president would require 67 votes. So, for Trump to be removed from office via impeachment, at least 20 Republicans and all the Democrats and independents would have to vote against him.
If the House adds charges of something like undertaking military operations without Congressional authorization (the Yemen drone assassination, for example), then Mike Lee and Rand Paul might have serious thoughts about voting to convict. Add in the 6 or so vulnerable R senators up for re-election in 2020 who may well lose if there's a real trial with evidence and they don't vote to convict, and you are getting to a real, but insufficient, majority voting to convict.
That'll seriously worry the party loyalists, and things _may_ snowball. It's not necessarily the most likely outcome, but it's more plausible.