COVID-19

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Locked
User avatar
Ben B
Stargoon
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:28 pm
Location: Uranus

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by Ben B » Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:47 am

Ladysavage wrote:
Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:01 am
A Facebook friend of mine who I've not seen in 20 years is now posting all-sorts of stuff about not ordering from Wish because of the virus. I can think of many reasons not to order from that site but getting coronavirus isn't one of them
I presume they think this Simpsons episode was a documentary.
The first ten million years were the worst.
And the second ten million, they were the worst too.

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5966
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by lpm » Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:56 am

Image
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
bob sterman
Dorkwood
Posts: 1135
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm
Location: Location Location

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by bob sterman » Thu Jan 30, 2020 10:01 am

Gentleman Jim wrote:
Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:43 am
Just to get this "killer virus" thing into perspective:
How many have died from this corona virus so far? (estimated)
The new paper in the Lancet on 99 cases diagnosed from Jan 1st to Jan 20th in Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital does suggest that the fatality rate is likely to be substantially higher than seasonal influenza.

https://www.thelancet.com/pb-assets/Lan ... 302117.pdf

Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital specialises in infectious diseases - so reading the paper at first I thought perhaps they just got all the most severe cases transferred to them and therefore a high fatality rate should not be surprising.

However, they write in the paper "adult patients were admitted centrally to the hospital from the whole of Wuhan without selectivity."

If "without selectivity" means any confirmed cases - no matter how mild or severe the symptoms - then this would suggest that the case fatality rate for people with illness serious enough to lead to diagnosis and hospital admission is a lot higher than for confirmed seasonal influenza. This was a highly specialised well-equipped hospital (e.g. 3 patients got ECMO).

However, of course the big unknown is how many cases are so mild that they never get diagnosed.

User avatar
Gentleman Jim
Catbabel
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:38 pm

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by Gentleman Jim » Thu Jan 30, 2020 10:03 am

Don't forget that this will allow big farma and conspiratorial governments, to add another evul vaccine to poison people
Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools.

User avatar
Brightonian
Dorkwood
Posts: 1440
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:16 pm
Location: Usually UK, often France and Ireland

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by Brightonian » Thu Jan 30, 2020 10:25 am

sTeamTraen wrote:
Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:09 am
We need psychiatric research into age-related crankery. In my experience it mostly seems to affect the obvious group (men over about 45, c.f. Gannon etc), but also a small number of women, possibly from a slightly younger age. I've seen a couple of women with various New Age things in their profiles and photos in the mid-30s range (yes, I know) making weird claims about this outbreak, including that it's a plot by the US government to conceal the fact that they went bankrupt on Monday of last week.
Rang my father (83) last night and he told me he'd been out shopping twice yesterday. First for usual groceries, then again for more food, to maintain a stock in case supply chains get disrupted. I wouldn't really describe him as cranky, just cautious and sceptical, but he said he'd seen pictures of people fighting in a Wuhan supermarket over remaining food.

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5966
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by lpm » Thu Jan 30, 2020 10:44 am

Appears that 83 year old men are at particular risk of the virus.

And also at particular risk of a lockdown / disruption.

Having a stock of food is probably sensible.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
bob sterman
Dorkwood
Posts: 1135
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm
Location: Location Location

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by bob sterman » Thu Jan 30, 2020 10:53 am

sTeamTraen wrote:
Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:09 am
We need psychiatric research into age-related crankery. In my experience it mostly seems to affect the obvious group (men over about 45, c.f. Gannon etc), but also a small number of women, possibly from a slightly younger age. I've seen a couple of women with various New Age things in their profiles and photos in the mid-30s range (yes, I know) making weird claims about this outbreak, including that it's a plot by the US government to conceal the fact that they went bankrupt on Monday of last week.
If middle-aged men think or find that a bit of New Age crankery is attractive to women in their mid-30s - then you may have the answer!

User avatar
Gentleman Jim
Catbabel
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:38 pm

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by Gentleman Jim » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:02 am

Personal appeal:

f.ck the f.cking Corona viruses; Somebody do something about the goddam Picorna viruses
Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools.

Chris Preston
Snowbonk
Posts: 530
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:05 am

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by Chris Preston » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:13 am

You have foot and mouth disease?
Here grows much rhubarb.

User avatar
Gentleman Jim
Catbabel
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:38 pm

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by Gentleman Jim » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:20 am

Chris Preston wrote:
Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:13 am
You have foot and mouth disease?
Wrong genus, fortunately (or not) :lol:
Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools.

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5966
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by lpm » Thu Jan 30, 2020 12:55 pm

lpm wrote:
Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:56 am
Image
No. The "beer virus" searches add up to roughly 0% of all coronavirus searches. And there's good reason to suspect that most of them are just people goofing around and looking for memes.
https://twitter.com/_cingraham/status/1 ... 6613737472
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

OneOffDave
Clardic Fug
Posts: 211
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 9:26 am

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by OneOffDave » Thu Jan 30, 2020 1:43 pm

Of course everyone knows that Coronavirus is a major cause of bubbles tailing to pass their fizzical

User avatar
Brightonian
Dorkwood
Posts: 1440
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:16 pm
Location: Usually UK, often France and Ireland

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by Brightonian » Thu Jan 30, 2020 2:03 pm

lpm wrote:
Thu Jan 30, 2020 12:55 pm
lpm wrote:
Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:56 am
Image
No. The "beer virus" searches add up to roughly 0% of all coronavirus searches. And there's good reason to suspect that most of them are just people goofing around and looking for memes.
https://twitter.com/_cingraham/status/1 ... 6613737472
Yep, a few days ago someone sent me a contrived pic of a slice of lime and a Corona bottle, saying lyme disease goes well with coronavirus. Of course, I had to "lol" at that as she's someone I need to get on with for the next few weeks.

mikeh
Fuzzable
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 5:48 pm

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by mikeh » Thu Jan 30, 2020 10:18 pm

OneOffDave wrote:
Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:21 am
The reason the DHSC spokesperson may not know the detail about the flight from Wuhan will probably be that those flight type operations are run by FCO and higher levels of the other government departments aren't involved. Cross government involvement will be at a lower more operational level
Sorry just seen this, cheers, interesting to hear. Never did hear back from DHSC!

Edit - And apparently the Brits from Wuhan will be flown back and taken to that lovely village in the north - Quarantined-on-the-Wirral

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5966
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by lpm » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:04 am

Jesus. The poor bastards.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Princess POW
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by Bird on a Fire » Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:49 am

Interesting article on the beeb written by a prof from Chatham House:

Coronavirus: Why are we catching more diseases from animals?
Outbreaks of new infectious diseases are typically seen as a "one off".

But the new virus - thought to have stemmed from wildlife - highlights our risk from animal-borne disease. This is likely to be more of a problem in future as climate change and globalisation alter the way animals and humans interact.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.

User avatar
bob sterman
Dorkwood
Posts: 1135
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm
Location: Location Location

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by bob sterman » Fri Jan 31, 2020 9:07 am

Question for the knowledgeable...

When the WHO, in their situation reports, give separate figures for "Confirmed" and "Suspected" cases - presumably the "Suspected" cases are in addition to the "Confirmed" ones? E.g.

https://www.who.int/docs/default-source ... 0-ncov.pdf

User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 5229
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by Gfamily » Fri Jan 31, 2020 10:17 am

First confirmed UK cases
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51325192

Two members of the same family, No location or other details being given for the time being,
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8272
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by shpalman » Fri Jan 31, 2020 10:22 am

having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
Rich Scopie
Snowbonk
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:21 pm

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by Rich Scopie » Fri Jan 31, 2020 1:57 pm

Gfamily wrote:
Fri Jan 31, 2020 10:17 am
First confirmed UK cases
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51325192

Two members of the same family, No location or other details being given for the time being,
Good job the NHS is getting £350 million a week extra as of tomorrow. :?
(ETA: They're in Newcastle)
It first was a rumour dismissed as a lie, but then came the evidence none could deny:
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!

Herainestold
After Pie
Posts: 2029
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:23 pm

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by Herainestold » Fri Jan 31, 2020 3:54 pm

In China, innovative use of surveillance drones to spread public health awareness of corona virus.
Whether it will work is another matter but it is instructive to see the Chinese authorities response to an unprecedented public health crisis.
The Chinese government is using drones to police and harass citizens for walking outside without face masks, shows video from the English-language mouthpiece of the Communist party.



The video, posted by Global Times, shows various clips of a drone camera hovering over a person or group of people and cheekily telling them to go home and put a face mask on before coming back out in public.

“Yes, auntie, this is the drone speaking to you,” reads the caption.

The older woman looks up, seemingly puzzled at the machine flhying over her
https://nationalpost.com/news/world/cor ... a-2019ncov
Masking forever
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again

mikeh
Fuzzable
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 5:48 pm

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by mikeh » Fri Jan 31, 2020 3:56 pm

bob sterman wrote:
Fri Jan 31, 2020 9:07 am
Question for the knowledgeable...

When the WHO, in their situation reports, give separate figures for "Confirmed" and "Suspected" cases - presumably the "Suspected" cases are in addition to the "Confirmed" ones? E.g.

https://www.who.int/docs/default-source ... 0-ncov.pdf
Yep they're separate, so add together for the complete picture of how many people are of interest.

User avatar
bob sterman
Dorkwood
Posts: 1135
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm
Location: Location Location

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by bob sterman » Fri Jan 31, 2020 4:44 pm

Latest paper in The Lancet...

Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study

https://www.thelancet.com/lancet/articl ... orecasting
On the present trajectory, 2019-nCoV could be about to become a global epidemic in the absence of mitigation. Nevertheless, it might still be possible to secure containment of the spread of infection such that initial imported seeding cases or even early local transmission does not lead to a large epidemic in locations outside Wuhan. To possibly succeed, substantial, even draconian measures that limit population mobility should be seriously and immediately considered in affected areas, as should strategies to drastically reduce within-population contact rates through cancellation of mass gatherings, school closures, and instituting work-from-home arrangements, for example.
When clusters of cases start appearing in the UK - will the authorities bite the bullet and do this?

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5966
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by lpm » Fri Jan 31, 2020 5:22 pm

All this stuff is marvelously class-biased.

The working classes have to go to work (to provide essential services). The rest "work from home".
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
gosling
Stargoon
Posts: 127
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:12 am

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by gosling » Fri Jan 31, 2020 6:37 pm

TOOLS FOR CORONAVIRUS RESEARCHERS Many of the above, and others, have signed a joint statement, sent out by the health charity Wellcome, committing to work together to ensure that research findings and data relevant to the new coronavirus are shared rapidly and openly.

Locked