A piece of misreporting takes on a life of its own
- Brightonian
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1298
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:16 pm
- Location: Usually UK, often France and Ireland
A piece of misreporting takes on a life of its own
A Twitter thread: https://twitter.com/Orla_Hegarty/status ... 0735082497
- bob sterman
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 997
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm
- Location: Location Location
- Woodchopper
- Light of Blast
- Posts: 6465
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: A piece of misreporting takes on a life of its own
That’s a really interesting example of how a conventional wisdom is created from endless repetition of dodgy data.
Re: A piece of misreporting takes on a life of its own
citogenesis is a great word.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
- Woodchopper
- Light of Blast
- Posts: 6465
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: A piece of misreporting takes on a life of its own
There’s a similar process involving:
Anonymous account writes something on Twitter -> gets repeated by celebrities with lots of followers -> dodgy media reports the celeb tweets -> the controversy is reported by established media -> for many becomes a ‘fact’.
-
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: A piece of misreporting takes on a life of its own
The CIA (and others) made, and presumably still make, extensive use of this principle. The idea is to put a completely fabricated story about e.g. communist atrocities* into a local paper in, say, Guatemala, then get it into a national paper, then into the international press, working up the 'reliability' chain till it's in the New York Times as an established fact.
*Some stories of communist atrocities were of course true.
*Some stories of communist atrocities were of course true.
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10134
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: A piece of misreporting takes on a life of its own
After the Met shot Jean Charles de Menezes, it was widely reported that he'd jumped the ticket barrier and run from police.
In fact, he'd paid the fare with his Oyster card and was walking normally. A witness had seen a cop jump the barrier, and got confused.
Nevertheless the known falsehood was encouraged to circulate, no doubt because it made Dick et al. look sightly less spectacularly and tragically incompetent, and to this day a lot of people believe it.
In fact, he'd paid the fare with his Oyster card and was walking normally. A witness had seen a cop jump the barrier, and got confused.
Nevertheless the known falsehood was encouraged to circulate, no doubt because it made Dick et al. look sightly less spectacularly and tragically incompetent, and to this day a lot of people believe it.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
- bob sterman
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 997
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm
- Location: Location Location
Re: A piece of misreporting takes on a life of its own
That falsehood still circulates today! It's infuriating. Along with the nonsense about him wearing a big heavy coat with wires protruding from it - probably another cop with a radio.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 11:57 amAfter the Met shot Jean Charles de Menezes, it was widely reported that he'd jumped the ticket barrier and run from police.
In fact, he'd paid the fare with his Oyster card and was walking normally. A witness had seen a cop jump the barrier, and got confused.
Nevertheless the known falsehood was encouraged to circulate, no doubt because it made Dick et al. look sightly less spectacularly and tragically incompetent, and to this day a lot of people believe it.