COVID-19

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Locked
User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5276
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Post by jimbob » Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:19 am

JQH wrote:
Fri Mar 06, 2020 11:57 am
TopBadger wrote:
Thu Mar 05, 2020 8:32 pm
So this is frightening...

What the 1918 flu's hidden history can teach the coronavirus era

https://flip.it/7._14u
The best we can do is not be as complacent as the people of 1918 — and choose leadership that offers reality-based responses.
Looks like we're f.cked then. Trump gutted the CDC and claims it's a hoax. Over here, Matt Hancock's claims to have been working with the supermarket chains to guarantee the food supply have been denied by the industry.
This aged about as well as you thought
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
headshot
Dorkwood
Posts: 1414
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 9:40 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by headshot » Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:19 am

shpalman wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:02 pm
shpalman wrote:
Tue Aug 11, 2020 6:20 pm
... and the publication of UK deaths data is temporarily paused while an urgent review is carried out...

You'll notice that it was so urgent when it was asked for on the 17th of July that they're only doing it now.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus ... -and-cases
Reduced by 5000 - there's now a 28-day cutoff because the UK has no system for declaring when covid-sufferers no longer have covid.
If only there was some way of finding out. Some sort of test they could do...

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by Woodchopper » Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:49 am

About 3.4 million people in England have been infected with Covid-19, a figure far higher than previous estimates, a study suggests.

The results come from the world’s largest home testing programme to find antibodies for the coronavirus, a study involving more than 100,000 volunteers and carried out by Imperial College London.

Conducted with the use of a simple finger-prick home test said to be easy and accurate enough for mass surveillance studies, the programme suggested 6% of England’s population had already been infected with Covid-19 by 13 July.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... y-suggests

Herd immunity is still a long way off.

With excess deaths at circa 65700 that gives a crude IFR of 1.93%. Maybe Italy just got it really bad.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by Woodchopper » Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:32 am

shpalman wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:02 pm
shpalman wrote:
Tue Aug 11, 2020 6:20 pm
... and the publication of UK deaths data is temporarily paused while an urgent review is carried out...

You'll notice that it was so urgent when it was asked for on the 17th of July that they're only doing it now.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus ... -and-cases
Reduced by 5000 - there's now a 28-day cutoff because the UK has no system for declaring when covid-sufferers no longer have covid.
See also here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... 200812.pdf

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4746
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by Grumble » Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:07 am

Woodchopper wrote:
Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:32 am
shpalman wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:02 pm
shpalman wrote:
Tue Aug 11, 2020 6:20 pm
... and the publication of UK deaths data is temporarily paused while an urgent review is carried out...

You'll notice that it was so urgent when it was asked for on the 17th of July that they're only doing it now.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus ... -and-cases
Reduced by 5000 - there's now a 28-day cutoff because the UK has no system for declaring when covid-sufferers no longer have covid.
See also here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... 200812.pdf
5,000 is a lot to reduce the death toll by, we’re talking more than 10% on the official death toll (not excess deaths)
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 5180
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: COVID-19

Post by Gfamily » Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:29 am

The most recent More or Less* has a discussion about the different counts used across England, Scotland and Wales - until now any death of a previously positive tested person would count in England, regardless of time since the test or any other circumstance.
As they point out, there are issues with most ways of counting, the best should be the ONS figures based on what's recorded on the Death Certificate, but that is a very delayed figure.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02nrs ... /downloads

*Essential listening.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by Woodchopper » Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:32 am

Just moved some posts on Giuseppe Tritto and the World Academy of Biomedical Sciences and Technologiesover to the Corona Woo thread.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by Woodchopper » Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:51 pm

Good news
Recent studies have indicated that antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 drop significantly within 2 months. In this preprint, Wu et al. analysed antibody responses in 349 individuals who were among the first to become infected with SARS-CoV-2. All antiviral antibody titres significantly increased in the first weeks after disease onset, followed by a contraction phase, where IgM became undetectable at around week 10–13. Importantly, although Spike-targeted IgG (IgG-S) declined over time, it remained detectable at relatively high levels until the end of the 6-month study period. IgG-S titres correlated closely with neutralizing capacity, although exact correlates of protection for SARS-CoV-2 are still elusive. These results suggest that antibody responses in symptomatic patients with COVID-19 follow a prototypical progression and result in a sustained memory response, suggesting long-term protective immunity.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-020-00423-9

AMS
Snowbonk
Posts: 466
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 11:14 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by AMS » Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:38 pm

292 positive cases in a Northants sandwich factory.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... orthampton

Raises a few questions - for example, is this is a setting where people would have been wearing masks even before covid? And like abbatoirs, it's presumably a cold environment.

Also, is this enough of a cluster to put Northampton into a local lockdown?

Hunting Dog
Fuzzable
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 7:48 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by Hunting Dog » Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:08 pm

Me and other-half have both been 'randomly selected' to take part in a UCL/Mori/NHS research thing which involves them sending you a swab test by post and picking up by courier, to "assess the level of infection in the community" - test is for active cases, not for anti-bodies of past cases

we both said Yes to doing it, although we haven't had any symptoms and have (except for short, masked and sanitised visits to a few small local shops) been completely isolated since March, so I'm reasonably sure I can predict the result would be negative

thought we should probably still do it though, as if everyone that thinks they'd be negative declines to do the test I assume that would skew the results unhelpfully? or would people that think they might be positive be more likely to drop out?

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8244
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: COVID-19

Post by shpalman » Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:56 pm

Hunting Dog wrote:
Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:08 pm
Me and other-half have both been 'randomly selected' to take part in a UCL/Mori/NHS research thing which involves them sending you a swab test by post and picking up by courier, to "assess the level of infection in the community" - test is for active cases, not for anti-bodies of past cases

we both said Yes to doing it, although we haven't had any symptoms and have (except for short, masked and sanitised visits to a few small local shops) been completely isolated since March, so I'm reasonably sure I can predict the result would be negative

thought we should probably still do it though, as if everyone that thinks they'd be negative declines to do the test I assume that would skew the results unhelpfully? or would people that think they might be positive be more likely to drop out?
I'd hope anyone who thought they might be positive would have asked for a test already, and that this research thing is to get an idea of the asymptomatic cases.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
discovolante
Stummy Beige
Posts: 4084
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by discovolante » Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:47 pm

Hunting Dog wrote:
Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:08 pm
Me and other-half have both been 'randomly selected' to take part in a UCL/Mori/NHS research thing which involves them sending you a swab test by post and picking up by courier, to "assess the level of infection in the community" - test is for active cases, not for anti-bodies of past cases

we both said Yes to doing it, although we haven't had any symptoms and have (except for short, masked and sanitised visits to a few small local shops) been completely isolated since March, so I'm reasonably sure I can predict the result would be negative

thought we should probably still do it though, as if everyone that thinks they'd be negative declines to do the test I assume that would skew the results unhelpfully? or would people that think they might be positive be more likely to drop out?
Does the study not ask things about your lifestyle? Or at least surely the results would account for/explain how it had considered variations in behaviour. If it didn't it sounds like it would be a poor study and I ain't a scientist. Presumably the random selection bit is part of it.
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4746
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by Grumble » Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:56 pm

AMS wrote:
Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:38 pm
292 positive cases in a Northants sandwich factory.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... orthampton

Raises a few questions - for example, is this is a setting where people would have been wearing masks even before covid? And like abbatoirs, it's presumably a cold environment.

Also, is this enough of a cluster to put Northampton into a local lockdown?
I don’t think masks would be normal. Hair nets, gloves, but not masks. Even if they were I doubt they’d wear masks in the break rooms etc.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

geejaytee
Clardic Fug
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:32 pm
Location: Norf Landan, mate

Re: COVID-19

Post by geejaytee » Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:22 pm

As a former sandwich factory operative*, yes, it was hairnets and beard snoods (not the neckwarmer type), and sleeveguards but not gloves, with the factory floor kept at <4C with copious hand sanitiser available (bits outside the factory floor would still be chilled, but not at refrigerator temps). The workers on each line would be quite close, maybe shoulder-width apart.

Outside food-prep areas, the plastic PPE and coveralls (long white/blue jackets like butchers - white for the factory floor, blue for inbound/veg prep/dispatch) would be taken off.

*I worked for a company that got bought by Greencore who then moved the factory.

Hunting Dog
Fuzzable
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 7:48 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by Hunting Dog » Fri Aug 14, 2020 11:22 am

discovolante wrote:
Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:47 pm
Hunting Dog wrote:
Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:08 pm
Me and other-half have both been 'randomly selected' to take part in a UCL/Mori/NHS research thing which involves them sending you a swab test by post and picking up by courier, to "assess the level of infection in the community" - test is for active cases, not for anti-bodies of past cases

we both said Yes to doing it, although we haven't had any symptoms and have (except for short, masked and sanitised visits to a few small local shops) been completely isolated since March, so I'm reasonably sure I can predict the result would be negative

thought we should probably still do it though, as if everyone that thinks they'd be negative declines to do the test I assume that would skew the results unhelpfully? or would people that think they might be positive be more likely to drop out?
Does the study not ask things about your lifestyle? Or at least surely the results would account for/explain how it had considered variations in behaviour. If it didn't it sounds like it would be a poor study and I ain't a scientist. Presumably the random selection bit is part of it.
It did ask about how many people in household - and my type of job (none) - nothing yet about social arrangements / or lack-of...

User avatar
discovolante
Stummy Beige
Posts: 4084
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by discovolante » Fri Aug 14, 2020 11:23 am

Is there no point of contact to ask these questions if you're unsure? I took part in a study a while back related to something else and there was someone I could speak to. I'm also pretty sure Señor von Laté is a point of contact in a study he's assisting on.
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by Woodchopper » Fri Aug 14, 2020 12:14 pm

discovolante wrote:
Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:47 pm
Hunting Dog wrote:
Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:08 pm
Me and other-half have both been 'randomly selected' to take part in a UCL/Mori/NHS research thing which involves them sending you a swab test by post and picking up by courier, to "assess the level of infection in the community" - test is for active cases, not for anti-bodies of past cases

we both said Yes to doing it, although we haven't had any symptoms and have (except for short, masked and sanitised visits to a few small local shops) been completely isolated since March, so I'm reasonably sure I can predict the result would be negative

thought we should probably still do it though, as if everyone that thinks they'd be negative declines to do the test I assume that would skew the results unhelpfully? or would people that think they might be positive be more likely to drop out?
Does the study not ask things about your lifestyle? Or at least surely the results would account for/explain how it had considered variations in behaviour. If it didn't it sounds like it would be a poor study and I ain't a scientist. Presumably the random selection bit is part of it.
Not necessarily poor. Just depends upon what its trying to do.

If the aim of the study is to work out Covid prevalance then there is a limited amount of additional data that can be collected. First is the problem of entering and checking the data received into a database which will very likely cost money. If there isn't enough funding they won't be able to process additional data. Second is amount of time people are willing to devote to completing the study. If they ask too many questions there is a risk people will give up and not bother to complete the exercise.

There may also be data protection issues about collecting some lifestyle data along with a medical test. That data can be collected but it may involve additional time and costs - eg asking the participants to sign an additional consent form or further anonymizing the data.

User avatar
discovolante
Stummy Beige
Posts: 4084
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by discovolante » Fri Aug 14, 2020 12:26 pm

Woodchopper wrote:
Fri Aug 14, 2020 12:14 pm
discovolante wrote:
Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:47 pm
Hunting Dog wrote:
Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:08 pm
Me and other-half have both been 'randomly selected' to take part in a UCL/Mori/NHS research thing which involves them sending you a swab test by post and picking up by courier, to "assess the level of infection in the community" - test is for active cases, not for anti-bodies of past cases

we both said Yes to doing it, although we haven't had any symptoms and have (except for short, masked and sanitised visits to a few small local shops) been completely isolated since March, so I'm reasonably sure I can predict the result would be negative

thought we should probably still do it though, as if everyone that thinks they'd be negative declines to do the test I assume that would skew the results unhelpfully? or would people that think they might be positive be more likely to drop out?
Does the study not ask things about your lifestyle? Or at least surely the results would account for/explain how it had considered variations in behaviour. If it didn't it sounds like it would be a poor study and I ain't a scientist. Presumably the random selection bit is part of it.
Not necessarily poor. Just depends upon what its trying to do.

If the aim of the study is to work out Covid prevalance then there is a limited amount of additional data that can be collected. First is the problem of entering and checking the data received into a database which will very likely cost money. If there isn't enough funding they won't be able to process additional data. Second is amount of time people are willing to devote to completing the study. If they ask too many questions there is a risk people will give up and not bother to complete the exercise.

There may also be data protection issues about collecting some lifestyle data along with a medical test. That data can be collected but it may involve additional time and costs - eg asking the participants to sign an additional consent form or further anonymizing the data.
Sure, but what I perhaps didn't express very well is that those kinds of limitations should be accounted for when commenting on the results, no?
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4746
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by Grumble » Fri Aug 14, 2020 1:46 pm

A contractor at work, who works in a different building from me thankfully, has called to say they have Covid-19. They got their test result today. They were in work yesterday. Apparently the team have been following the rules in work but have been going out for meals and so on outside of work.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
discovolante
Stummy Beige
Posts: 4084
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by discovolante » Fri Aug 14, 2020 1:50 pm

Grumble wrote:
Fri Aug 14, 2020 1:46 pm
A contractor at work, who works in a different building from me thankfully, has called to say they have Covid-19. They got their test result today. They were in work yesterday. Apparently the team have been following the rules in work but have been going out for meals and so on outside of work.
Going out for meals isn't breaking the rules though?
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4746
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by Grumble » Fri Aug 14, 2020 2:07 pm

discovolante wrote:
Fri Aug 14, 2020 1:50 pm
Grumble wrote:
Fri Aug 14, 2020 1:46 pm
A contractor at work, who works in a different building from me thankfully, has called to say they have Covid-19. They got their test result today. They were in work yesterday. Apparently the team have been following the rules in work but have been going out for meals and so on outside of work.
Going out for meals isn't breaking the rules though?
You’re only meant to go out with your household aren’t you?
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by lpm » Fri Aug 14, 2020 2:17 pm

Who the f.ck knows. You got a PhD in UK Covid rules or something?
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by lpm » Fri Aug 14, 2020 2:20 pm

Ah, some good news. The government's official UK R number is unchanged at 0.8 to 1.0. Cases are falling at -4% to -1% per day.




IMPORTANT GOVERNMENT NOTICE:
DO NOT LOOK AT ANY CHARTS OF CASES. ANY UPWARDS LINE ON CHARTS IS A STATISTICAL ARTEFACT. CASES ARE FALLING NOT RISING.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by Woodchopper » Fri Aug 14, 2020 2:20 pm

discovolante wrote:
Fri Aug 14, 2020 12:26 pm
Woodchopper wrote:
Fri Aug 14, 2020 12:14 pm
discovolante wrote:
Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:47 pm


Does the study not ask things about your lifestyle? Or at least surely the results would account for/explain how it had considered variations in behaviour. If it didn't it sounds like it would be a poor study and I ain't a scientist. Presumably the random selection bit is part of it.
Not necessarily poor. Just depends upon what its trying to do.

If the aim of the study is to work out Covid prevalance then there is a limited amount of additional data that can be collected. First is the problem of entering and checking the data received into a database which will very likely cost money. If there isn't enough funding they won't be able to process additional data. Second is amount of time people are willing to devote to completing the study. If they ask too many questions there is a risk people will give up and not bother to complete the exercise.

There may also be data protection issues about collecting some lifestyle data along with a medical test. That data can be collected but it may involve additional time and costs - eg asking the participants to sign an additional consent form or further anonymizing the data.
Sure, but what I perhaps didn't express very well is that those kinds of limitations should be accounted for when commenting on the results, no?
Yes, indeed.

User avatar
discovolante
Stummy Beige
Posts: 4084
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by discovolante » Fri Aug 14, 2020 2:32 pm

Grumble wrote:
Fri Aug 14, 2020 2:07 pm
discovolante wrote:
Fri Aug 14, 2020 1:50 pm
Grumble wrote:
Fri Aug 14, 2020 1:46 pm
A contractor at work, who works in a different building from me thankfully, has called to say they have Covid-19. They got their test result today. They were in work yesterday. Apparently the team have been following the rules in work but have been going out for meals and so on outside of work.
Going out for meals isn't breaking the rules though?
You’re only meant to go out with your household aren’t you?
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/meeting-peo ... rom-4-july
When eating or drinking out with people you do not live with, you should only meet one other household if you are seated indoors.

If you are eating or drinking outdoors, you can do so with one other household or in a group of up to 6 people from different households. You should take care to limit your interactions with anyone outside the group you visit these places with.
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.

Locked