The same bit of space but they are not lined up. The JW one is rotated about 1/6 of a turn anticlockwise and zoomed in a bit.plodder wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 8:53 amThe slidey thing here: https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... axy-images
It's not lined up right, right? These are two different bits of space?
Astronomy and Space
Re: Astronomy and Space
Jaap's Page: https://www.jaapsch.net/
Re: Astronomy and Space
The HST image itself is a composite from at least two imaging sessions as well - you can tell because there are 8 spikes on the brightest star's image - 4 very clear, and 4 offset by about 20 degrees. I suggest that one of the sessions was in optical range, and one in the near IR where Hubble has some capability.jaap wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 9:40 amThe same bit of space but they are not lined up. The JW one is rotated about 1/6 of a turn anticlockwise and zoomed in a bit.plodder wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 8:53 amThe slidey thing here: https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... axy-images
It's not lined up right, right? These are two different bits of space?
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
Re: Astronomy and Space
Or the goalie holding a tennis ball, if you want a purely sports* analogy.Gfamily wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 9:06 amFor an idea of the scale, imagine the photo on your phone's screen.
Now imagine you're a goalkeeper and the other goalkeeper is showing you this image from their goalline (I don't know why they have your phone, but bear with me). That's the area of the image* on the sky.
*Appx 7cm at 100 metres.
Which is really big compared to one bit of what I do, which is more like a tennis ball on the moon. Or 7cm at 380,000,000 meters. This is the size of the ring in the EHT images.
And really small compared to the other bit if what I do, which is like 7cm at 10cm for the field of view (45° on the sky, sine rather than tangent because we're working on a sphere). This is roughly the size of the full map that makes up Gfamily's avatar.
Although the main thing I do has about the same image sizes as JWST.
*A sport with goals 100m apart that uses tennis balls. Or we could go to cricket, I guess.
- Stranger Mouse
- After Pie
- Posts: 1727
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: Astronomy and Space
Someone here has done a nice Webb / Hubble overlay https://twitter.com/luckytran/status/15 ... e2L1NRD_bQ
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works
Re: Astronomy and Space
Anyone got one of these self-assembly brass orreries? They look rather nice, but at 60 cm across I'm not sure where I'd put it.
(If anyone's tempted, there's a widely advertised code for £100 off.)
(If anyone's tempted, there's a widely advertised code for £100 off.)
Re: Astronomy and Space
Missed the Perseids last night (OK, I forgot) and only remembered the Big Moon this morning. Still looked pretty big, though it's hard to tell from a photograph.
I take it this counts as 'Astronomy and Space'?

I take it this counts as 'Astronomy and Space'?
Some people call me strange.
I prefer unconventional.
But I'm willing to compromise and accept eccentric.
I prefer unconventional.
But I'm willing to compromise and accept eccentric.
Re: Astronomy and Space
The moon would have reduced the visibility of the Perseids, so it wouldn't have been a great display. They are spread over a longish period though, so keep looking while it's clear. The moon will be rising about 45 minutes later each evening, so you'll soon be able to get some dark skies before n it rises and spoils things.
The talk of the s****moon is mostly bollocks, each year we'll inevitably get one full moon where it's nearer than any other (and thus seemingly larger). However, unless you were told, you wouldn't know which full moon it is by looking at it.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
- Trinucleus
- Catbabel
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
Re: Astronomy and Space
I really can't see how people can say 'look how big the supermoon is' in pictures taken with a telephoto lens
Re: Astronomy and Space
That's why I included the chimney stack.Trinucleus wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 8:35 amI really can't see how people can say 'look how big the supermoon is' in pictures taken with a telephoto lens
Some people call me strange.
I prefer unconventional.
But I'm willing to compromise and accept eccentric.
I prefer unconventional.
But I'm willing to compromise and accept eccentric.
Re: Astronomy and Space
That does not help. Without knowing exactly how far away the chimney stack is, and how large the stack really is, such a photo leaves you as confused as Father Dougal. It is easy to make E.T.-style huge moon silhouette pictures just by being far enough away from the comparison object.Aitch wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 8:55 amThat's why I included the chimney stack.Trinucleus wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 8:35 amI really can't see how people can say 'look how big the supermoon is' in pictures taken with a telephoto lens
I suppose you could work out what angle you are looking up to the stack at, make an assumption about how many floors the building has, and work out the distance from that. Or work out the distance from the paralax on the three pairs of pipes. But the uncertainty in all of that as well as the uncertainty in the actual size of the stack far outweighs any apparent change of the size of the moon in the sky.
Jaap's Page: https://www.jaapsch.net/
Re: Astronomy and Space
The full moon always looks big as it rises - it's an optical illusion thingy - probably because the brain knows that clouds near to the horizon look smaller than clouds overheard (because they are further away), so it scales them up accordingly, and the same applies when judging the size of the Moon near to the horizon.
In addition, across the summer months, the moon stays nearer to the horizon overnight, and we're more likely to be sitting out under a moonlit night in the summer.
Don't get me started on the stupid names they give to the full moon each month either - the acorn moon and the screwfix moon or whatever.
In addition, across the summer months, the moon stays nearer to the horizon overnight, and we're more likely to be sitting out under a moonlit night in the summer.
Don't get me started on the stupid names they give to the full moon each month either - the acorn moon and the screwfix moon or whatever.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
- Trinucleus
- Catbabel
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
Re: Astronomy and Space
But is it a supermoon at 30x zoom or an ordinary moon at 32x?Aitch wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 8:55 amThat's why I included the chimney stack.Trinucleus wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 8:35 amI really can't see how people can say 'look how big the supermoon is' in pictures taken with a telephoto lens
Re: Astronomy and Space
The most fun thing about the moon illusion is that the effect disappears if you look at it through your legs.Gfamily wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:53 amThe full moon always looks big as it rises - it's an optical illusion thingy - probably because the brain knows that clouds near to the horizon look smaller than clouds overheard (because they are further away), so it scales them up accordingly, and the same applies when judging the size of the Moon near to the horizon.
Re: Astronomy and Space
As does your dignity.monkey wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 2:02 pmThe most fun thing about the moon illusion is that the effect disappears if you look at it through your legs.Gfamily wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:53 amThe full moon always looks big as it rises - it's an optical illusion thingy - probably because the brain knows that clouds near to the horizon look smaller than clouds overheard (because they are further away), so it scales them up accordingly, and the same applies when judging the size of the Moon near to the horizon.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!