Science is f.cked, part 94

Get your science fix here: research, quackery, activism and all the rest
Post Reply
User avatar
sTeamTraen
Snowbonk
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm

Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by sTeamTraen » Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:51 pm

Sitting in a sleazy snackbar sucking sickly sausage rolls

User avatar
Woodchopper
Dorkwood
Posts: 1417
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by Woodchopper » Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:03 pm

Good work!

User avatar
Stupidosaurus
Bank Butt
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:11 am

Re: Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by Stupidosaurus » Wed Apr 22, 2020 12:44 pm

Congratulations on the masterly restraint and understatement used to describe this stinking sack of rotten entrails masquerading as a scientific paper.

Allo V Psycho
Clardic Fug
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2019 8:18 am

Re: Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by Allo V Psycho » Sun Apr 26, 2020 7:38 am

Just seen this. Still laughing/shaking head in dismay.

User avatar
sTeamTraen
Snowbonk
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm

Re: Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by sTeamTraen » Thu Jun 04, 2020 5:38 pm

Hooray! It's been retracted!
Sitting in a sleazy snackbar sucking sickly sausage rolls

User avatar
Martin Y
Dorkwood
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Re: Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by Martin Y » Thu Jun 04, 2020 5:52 pm

Succinctly damning description in the retraction notice: "... results described in the Article, in particular the outcomes of statistical analyses, are internally inconsistent and that some results are mathematically impossible"

User avatar
sTeamTraen
Snowbonk
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm

Re: Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by sTeamTraen » Thu Jun 04, 2020 6:10 pm

Martin Y wrote:
Thu Jun 04, 2020 5:52 pm
Succinctly damning description in the retraction notice: "... results described in the Article, in particular the outcomes of statistical analyses, are internally inconsistent and that some results are mathematically impossible"
It was nice of them to thank the person who brought the issues to their attention, too.

Oh, wait, they didn't do that. The information just landed on their desk through a stargate.
Sitting in a sleazy snackbar sucking sickly sausage rolls

Post Reply