Terrible graphs
Re: Terrible graphs
I don't think Excel can do that thing with the x-axis labels being in two rows. If the labels are long, you have to put up with overlapping labels or change the angle of them. You might be able to do it by putting in hard line-breaks manually, but that's hard work and definitely means it wasn't done innocently.
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10134
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Terrible graphs
Only if it recognises them as dates. If it thinks they're text they get treated as categories.Martin_B wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 9:15 amExcel handles dates better than that, though. Again, it would require sorting the data into descending order and then plottingBird on a Fire wrote: ↑Tue May 19, 2020 6:25 pmAlthough, somebody might make a graph, then sort the cells to look at the data, without realising that the graph would be automatically updated to the new order, and then not check it. Excel doesn't always handle dates well either.
It could also have been plotting, and then sorting the data.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10134
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Terrible graphs
And now, this
- Attachments
-
- dohqa8l94kb41.png (138.4 KiB) Viewed 4093 times
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Terrible graphs
That's brilliant. Well found.
They also seem pretty short - but I guess if it was women under 40, it would be higher.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
-
- Stargoon
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 2:05 pm
Re: Terrible graphs
I'm not sure I'd trust that graph - do you see some of those pink women are jumping up off the x-axis - that's cheating!
Re: Terrible graphs
The title says "females" rather than women, which I estimate would bring the average down by around 5-10 cm. But that's probably just another error in the graph.
I notice that the heights are rounded to the nearest inch, but only one of those countries still uses 18th-century units, meaning there is significant loss of precision and possibly accuracy in the data.
Also, f.ck pink.
Re: Terrible graphs
Also, if on a "per country" basis, would that mean the average for the EU would be about 2.3" (6cm) ?
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
-
- Catbabel
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2019 8:18 am
Re: Terrible graphs
I totally want to see the Latvian women's football team play India, with India providing the ball.
Re: Terrible graphs
I was too perturbed by the the sizes to actually spot those.Sciolus wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2020 10:14 amThe title says "females" rather than women, which I estimate would bring the average down by around 5-10 cm. But that's probably just another error in the graph.
I notice that the heights are rounded to the nearest inch, but only one of those countries still uses 18th-century units, meaning there is significant loss of precision and possibly accuracy in the data.
Also, f.ck pink.
And f.ck pink.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
- basementer
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm
- Location: 8024, Aotearoa
- Contact:
Re: Terrible graphs
The graphic originally came from morethanmyheight.com, a site which looks American to me, hence the inches.
It's run by a pair of tall sisters who have set up a clothing line for tall women.
It's run by a pair of tall sisters who have set up a clothing line for tall women.
Money is just a substitute for luck anyway. - Tom Siddell
Re: Terrible graphs
Well, that's disappointing. I really want to shop at a company that designs for y'all women but not one that designs quite so badly as this.basementer wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2020 8:31 pmThe graphic originally came from morethanmyheight.com, a site which looks American to me, hence the inches.
It's run by a pair of tall sisters who have set up a clothing line for tall women.

- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10134
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Terrible graphs
Heh. According to their What is MTMH section:Squeak wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2020 10:26 pmWell, that's disappointing. I really want to shop at a company that designs for y'all women but not one that designs quite so badly as this.basementer wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2020 8:31 pmThe graphic originally came from morethanmyheight.com, a site which looks American to me, hence the inches.
It's run by a pair of tall sisters who have set up a clothing line for tall women.![]()
So it sounds like designing clothes was their original interest, and the blog with graphs came second - so, hopefully, their clothing design is up to a higher standardSince 2014, we have been designing our clothing line for tall women, Amalli Talli – as well as writing style + fashion blogs for our customers.
Over time, we started hearing more and more requests from our customer base asking us for advice on confidence, body image and self-esteem… not only for themselves, but for their daughters and granddaughters, too! There’s no doubt we were both genuinely touch and inspired by what we read, and we knew this was a mission we would whole-heartedly accept!
So in 2017, More Than My Height was born to have honest and real conversations about growing up tall, and to change the narrative from ‘tall girl problems’ into one that is much more positive! We believe in tall body positivity, and are working on spread it with the hashtag #tallbopo.

We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Terrible graphs
What's up with this erectile dysfunction plot? Haven't they seen the well-known optical illusion with two curved lines next to each other where it's hard to tell which one is longer?
Re: Terrible graphs
When I saw that one I assumed that it was angle you were supposed to be comparing, not length.
But I did also think "What's wrong with a normal bar chart?", and "Why doesn't the red line go all the way to 180 deg?". I think the last one is because production would be 180 deg, but then I thought "Why isn't production on there too instead of/as well as demand?"
Re: Terrible graphs
Probably, but the larger angle has a smaller area, so you have to observe closely to see which is actually the larger quantity. (Or look at the text, but then why bother with the graphic?)
Re: Terrible graphs
One of the reasons I wondered why they didn't use a bar chart*. But if someone was making me do an "erectile disfunction chart", I would have put lines on it like clock hands to show that it's the angle you're supposed to be looking at.
*I would have done it with one bar for the demand, and a composite for the renewables/neutral, and would have included non-green production too.
Re: Terrible graphs
Here's another and someone's fix
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
- basementer
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm
- Location: 8024, Aotearoa
- Contact:
Re: Terrible graphs
Being really short can make you like that.Lydia Gwilt wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2020 8:49 amI'm not sure I'd trust that graph - do you see some of those pink women are jumping up off the x-axis - that's cheating!
(No rush, eh?)
- Boustrophedon
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 2654
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire Wolds
Re: Terrible graphs
It helped me remember how to spell fuchsia when I found out it was named after the German botanist Leonhart Fuchs.
This place is not a place of honor,
No highly esteemed deed is commemorated here,
Nothing valued is her,
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
No highly esteemed deed is commemorated here,
Nothing valued is her,
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
Re: Terrible graphs
Not to be confused with the explorer Vivian Fuchs, subject of the apocryphal headline "Dr Fuchs off to Antarctica".Boustrophedon wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 11:33 amIt helped me remember how to spell fuchsia when I found out it was named after the German botanist Leonhart Fuchs.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
- Brightonian
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1298
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:16 pm
- Location: Usually UK, often France and Ireland
Re: Terrible graphs
Just tried to find an anecdote I once read about the mispronunciation of the Antarctic explorer's surname, but failed.Gfamily wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 12:23 pmNot to be confused with the explorer Vivian Fuchs, subject of the apocryphal headline "Dr Fuchs off to Antarctica".Boustrophedon wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 11:33 amIt helped me remember how to spell fuchsia when I found out it was named after the German botanist Leonhart Fuchs.
But I did find this Brazilian footballer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argel_Fuchs
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Terrible graphs
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
Re: Terrible graphs
He wasn't the most unfortunately named Brazilian footballer: there was Rafael Scheidt* who played for Celtic.Brightonian wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 3:21 pmJust tried to find an anecdote I once read about the mispronunciation of the Antarctic explorer's surname, but failed.Gfamily wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 12:23 pmNot to be confused with the explorer Vivian Fuchs, subject of the apocryphal headline "Dr Fuchs off to Antarctica".Boustrophedon wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 11:33 am
It helped me remember how to spell fuchsia when I found out it was named after the German botanist Leonhart Fuchs.
But I did find this Brazilian footballer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argel_Fuchs
*And he was