Page 3 of 3

Re: Terrible graphs

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 7:39 am
by nekomatic

Re: Terrible graphs

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 9:07 am
by shpalman
There were those who tried to correct by image manipulation it but didn't take account of the right y-axis having tics every 100 instead of 50; the correct answer is of course to replot the data at the source:

https://twitter.com/ShangguanJiewen/sta ... 8312864769

Re: Terrible graphs

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2023 3:09 pm
by jimbob
AMap.

And it took me a bit too long to see what the problem was

https://twitter.com/TerribleMaps/status ... m3sH6A1vNw

I quite liked these replies to my quote tweet

https://twitter.com/JimmyLedingham/stat ... m3sH6A1vNw

https://twitter.com/Marco_Piani/status/ ... m3sH6A1vNw

Re: Terrible graphs

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2023 3:48 pm
by Gfamily
jimbob wrote:
Sun Feb 05, 2023 3:09 pm
AMap.
And it took me a bit too long to see what the problem was
You're not alone at the most obvious map based one, but there are multiple other problems with the data, the colours, the groups ...

Re: Terrible graphs

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2023 4:09 pm
by Fishnut
Any ideas what it's actually trying to show? Even beyond the obvious problems with the southern continent, it looks like it's saying there's only one species of perching bird in most of North America.

Re: Terrible graphs

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2023 8:43 am
by Martin Y
It's showing an example of a planet with between 0.5 and 1.5 perching birds in Upper Africa?

Re: Terrible graphs

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2023 11:07 am
by jimbob
Fishnut wrote:
Sun Feb 05, 2023 4:09 pm
Any ideas what it's actually trying to show? Even beyond the obvious problems with the southern continent, it looks like it's saying there's only one species of perching bird in most of North America.
It is possible that it's photoshopped (although the textbook does have lots of maps with overlapping bins

0-50, 50-100 etc

Re: Terrible graphs

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2023 2:20 pm
by monkey
This is a figure from a paper in Science Advances. They might well have found something out, but I haven't checked because it just looks like they're taking the piss to me.
words_words_subject_subject.jpg
words_words_subject_subject.jpg (109.3 KiB) Viewed 3494 times
Image source: clicky

Paper: clicky

Re: Terrible graphs

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2023 6:00 pm
by dyqik
jimbob wrote:
Mon Feb 06, 2023 11:07 am
Fishnut wrote:
Sun Feb 05, 2023 4:09 pm
Any ideas what it's actually trying to show? Even beyond the obvious problems with the southern continent, it looks like it's saying there's only one species of perching bird in most of North America.
It is possible that it's photoshopped (although the textbook does have lots of maps with overlapping bins

0-50, 50-100 etc
That's OK for continuous variables, where the edge of one bin is only infinitesimally distant from the next. But not for discrete values like "number of species".

Re: Terrible graphs

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:21 pm
by jimbob
https://twitter.com/shashj/status/16252 ... h_AcHicgUg
Fo4SyeQX0AQOvi7.jpeg
Fo4SyeQX0AQOvi7.jpeg (64.89 KiB) Viewed 3398 times

Re: Terrible graphs

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 11:05 pm
by dyqik
jimbob wrote:
Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:21 pm
https://twitter.com/shashj/status/16252 ... h_AcHicgUg

Fo4SyeQX0AQOvi7.jpeg
Thanks to that, I've now got some idea of how big Nelson's Column is.

Re: Terrible graphs

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2023 2:57 pm
by JQH
How well does it fly?

Re: Terrible graphs

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2023 4:28 pm
by dyqik
JQH wrote:
Wed Mar 01, 2023 2:57 pm
How well does it fly?
Depends which direction you want it to fly in.

And how many pigeons you glue to it.