Terrible graphs

Get your science fix here: research, quackery, activism and all the rest
User avatar
nekomatic
Dorkwood
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:04 pm

Re: Terrible graphs

Post by nekomatic » Tue Jan 24, 2023 7:39 am

Move-a… side, and let the mango through… let the mango through

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 7582
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: Terrible graphs

Post by shpalman » Tue Jan 24, 2023 9:07 am

There were those who tried to correct by image manipulation it but didn't take account of the right y-axis having tics every 100 instead of 50; the correct answer is of course to replot the data at the source:

https://twitter.com/ShangguanJiewen/sta ... 8312864769
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 4547
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Terrible graphs

Post by jimbob » Sun Feb 05, 2023 3:09 pm

AMap.

And it took me a bit too long to see what the problem was

https://twitter.com/TerribleMaps/status ... m3sH6A1vNw

I quite liked these replies to my quote tweet

https://twitter.com/JimmyLedingham/stat ... m3sH6A1vNw

https://twitter.com/Marco_Piani/status/ ... m3sH6A1vNw
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 4588
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Terrible graphs

Post by Gfamily » Sun Feb 05, 2023 3:48 pm

jimbob wrote:
Sun Feb 05, 2023 3:09 pm
AMap.
And it took me a bit too long to see what the problem was
You're not alone at the most obvious map based one, but there are multiple other problems with the data, the colours, the groups ...
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

User avatar
Fishnut
After Pie
Posts: 2078
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:15 pm
Location: UK

Re: Terrible graphs

Post by Fishnut » Sun Feb 05, 2023 4:09 pm

Any ideas what it's actually trying to show? Even beyond the obvious problems with the southern continent, it looks like it's saying there's only one species of perching bird in most of North America.
it's okay to say "I don't know"

User avatar
Martin Y
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2776
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Re: Terrible graphs

Post by Martin Y » Mon Feb 06, 2023 8:43 am

It's showing an example of a planet with between 0.5 and 1.5 perching birds in Upper Africa?

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 4547
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Terrible graphs

Post by jimbob » Mon Feb 06, 2023 11:07 am

Fishnut wrote:
Sun Feb 05, 2023 4:09 pm
Any ideas what it's actually trying to show? Even beyond the obvious problems with the southern continent, it looks like it's saying there's only one species of perching bird in most of North America.
It is possible that it's photoshopped (although the textbook does have lots of maps with overlapping bins

0-50, 50-100 etc
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

Post Reply