Astronomy and Space

Get your science fix here: research, quackery, activism and all the rest
Post Reply
User avatar
shpalman
Light of Blast
Posts: 5438
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by shpalman » Thu Sep 09, 2021 12:08 pm

molto tricky

Al Capone Junior
Buzzberry
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2019 6:40 pm

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by Al Capone Junior » Fri Sep 10, 2021 4:05 am

Mike Brown is trying to ruin western civilization, again.

https://astronomy.com/magazine/2020/01/ ... lanet-nine

https://mikebrown.caltech.edu/

More theoretical data, but I hope he finds it. Will be awesome when he does. :D

User avatar
Grumble
After Pie
Posts: 2383
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by Grumble » Fri Sep 10, 2021 5:42 am

Al Capone Junior wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 4:05 am
Mike Brown is trying to ruin western civilization, again.

https://astronomy.com/magazine/2020/01/ ... lanet-nine

https://mikebrown.caltech.edu/

More theoretical data, but I hope he finds it. Will be awesome when he does. :D
Is there anything more recent than that? I will go for a hunt.

Edit: doesn’t seem to be. All gone a bit quiet from Mike Brown, but of course since that article was published we’ve had Covid-19, so maybe his research has been delayed?
You’ve got no chutzpah, your organisational skills are lacklustre and your timekeeping is abysmal.

User avatar
Gfamily
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2931
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by Gfamily » Fri Sep 10, 2021 8:13 am

A useful 'rule of thumb' when thinking about the size of the Solar System and the distances to the nearest stars is:
If the distance from the Earth to the Sun is 1 inch, a light year is a mile.

So, on that scale, we're 1 inch from the centre, that 'FarOut' object, is just over 10ft away, and to get to the nearest star is over 4 miles.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

User avatar
dyqik
Light of Blast
Posts: 4194
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by dyqik » Fri Sep 10, 2021 5:46 pm

Grumble wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 5:42 am
Al Capone Junior wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 4:05 am
Mike Brown is trying to ruin western civilization, again.

https://astronomy.com/magazine/2020/01/ ... lanet-nine

https://mikebrown.caltech.edu/

More theoretical data, but I hope he finds it. Will be awesome when he does. :D
Is there anything more recent than that? I will go for a hunt.

Edit: doesn’t seem to be. All gone a bit quiet from Mike Brown, but of course since that article was published we’ve had Covid-19, so maybe his research has been delayed?
The project I'm working on has Planet 9 as one of the subsidiary science items (goal is too strong a word here). We'll be scanning 70% of the sky to 1 mJy per pixel per day, for 7 years, at wavelengths across the peak of the blackbody spectrum for Kuiper and Oort cloud objects.

Al Capone Junior
Buzzberry
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2019 6:40 pm

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by Al Capone Junior » Sat Sep 11, 2021 9:14 pm

Grumble wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 5:42 am

Is there anything more recent than that? I will go for a hunt.

Edit: doesn’t seem to be. All gone a bit quiet from Mike Brown, but of course since that article was published we’ve had Covid-19, so maybe his research has been delayed?
Haha I didn't even look at the date of the paper, it came to me as a link to a "news" story that was a few weeks old. Slow news week when you're rehashing theoretical derivations of unseen planets which are perturbing Kuiper belt objects (Plutinos? Minor planets? I can't remember which is which*).

*But I know Pluto, as interesting as it is, ain't no planet. It doesn't clear its orbit. Third criterion fail.

And I'm not sure about it being the primary thing in orbit, as Charon is not that much smaller, and thus they orbit a common center of mass. Are double planets cool? Does that one have wiggle room? Or have those evil astronomers conspired against poor Pluto again?

But if you really think about it, a planetary lineup that had both Pluto and Jupiter would really just not be right. Yes, earth is dinky next to Jupiter, but you can still see it. Jupiter has side-eddies on its smallest storms that would render dinky Pluto null and void.

Actually I found the whole Pluto hullabaloo quite humorous, especially what happened to Neil Degrass tyson with the 5th grader hate mail. :shock:

Al Capone Junior
Buzzberry
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2019 6:40 pm

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by Al Capone Junior » Sun Sep 12, 2021 6:00 pm

Anyone who likes space and planetary science, especially if you also like history, should watch Parallax Nick on youtube

https://m.youtube.com/channel/UC0QdW-H7_l0zh_CoNhlwoBw

User avatar
Gfamily
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2931
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by Gfamily » Wed Sep 15, 2021 8:45 pm

Maybe surprisingly little attention has been given to the first completely private crewed orbital space mission.
Proper space tourism. Cost ~ $30 M, about $113 M raised in a raffle for charity.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... ilian-crew

A nice tweet thread from someone we know who is looking to get into sci communications.
https://twitter.com/DrJeniMillard/statu ... 87457?s=20
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

User avatar
jimbob
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by jimbob » Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:15 am

Might start a new thread as this is really Archaeology and Space.

https://theconversation.com/a-giant-spa ... dom-167678

I had come across the 2015 hypothesis (mentioned in the nature article https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-97778-3 the author links to) but this obviously has several years more evidence and analysis.

TLDR: There's evidence for a cometary airburst in the Dead Sea area around 1650 BCE. Three cities so fare have been identified as having a destruction layer at that time. With no evidence of military action and at least one was too hot to even be vulcanism.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
Gfamily
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2931
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by Gfamily » Wed Sep 22, 2021 10:39 am

jimbob wrote:
Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:15 am
Might start a new thread as this is really Archaeology and Space.

https://theconversation.com/a-giant-spa ... dom-167678

I had come across the 2015 hypothesis (mentioned in the nature article https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-97778-3 the author links to) but this obviously has several years more evidence and analysis.

TLDR: There's evidence for a cometary airburst in the Dead Sea area around 1650 BCE. Three cities so fare have been identified as having a destruction layer at that time. With no evidence of military action and at least one was too hot to even be vulcanism.
Some comments
https://twitter.com/MarkBoslough/status ... 6856282113

https://twitter.com/MarkBoslough/status ... 0497966089

https://twitter.com/MarkBoslough/status ... 0854800385
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

User avatar
shpalman
Light of Blast
Posts: 5438
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by shpalman » Wed Sep 22, 2021 11:17 am

Gfamily wrote:
Wed Sep 22, 2021 10:39 am
jimbob wrote:
Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:15 am
Might start a new thread as this is really Archaeology and Space.

https://theconversation.com/a-giant-spa ... dom-167678

I had come across the 2015 hypothesis (mentioned in the nature article https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-97778-3 the author links to) but this obviously has several years more evidence and analysis.

TLDR: There's evidence for a cometary airburst in the Dead Sea area around 1650 BCE. Three cities so fare have been identified as having a destruction layer at that time. With no evidence of military action and at least one was too hot to even be vulcanism.
Some comments
https://twitter.com/MarkBoslough/status ... 6856282113

https://twitter.com/MarkBoslough/status ... 0497966089

https://twitter.com/MarkBoslough/status ... 0854800385
Yeah as Mark Boslough eventually realizes, it's not a Nature article, it's in Scientific Reports. They publish any old sh.t.
molto tricky

Holylol
Buzzberry
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:14 am

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by Holylol » Wed Sep 22, 2021 3:32 pm

shpalman wrote:
Wed Sep 22, 2021 11:17 am
Yeah as Mark Boslough eventually realizes, it's not a Nature article, it's in Scientific Reports. They publish any old sh.t.
Ah Scientific Reports. Or as some of the people who published there call it: Nature's Scientific Reports

Post Reply