Functioning ‘mechanical gears’ seen in nature for the first time

Get your science fix here: research, quackery, activism and all the rest
Post Reply
User avatar
Woodchopper
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3166
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Functioning ‘mechanical gears’ seen in nature for the first time

Post by Woodchopper » Sat Mar 06, 2021 7:52 pm

Read all about it and watch a video here: https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/fun ... first-time

User avatar
Grumble
After Pie
Posts: 2009
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: Functioning ‘mechanical gears’ seen in nature for the first time

Post by Grumble » Sat Mar 06, 2021 7:55 pm

Woodchopper wrote:
Sat Mar 06, 2021 7:52 pm
Read all about it and watch a video here: https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/fun ... first-time
Published
12 Sep 2013
I knew I’d seen it before! Why has this one resurfaced I wonder?
You’ve got no chutzpah, your organisational skills are lacklustre and your timekeeping is abysmal.

User avatar
jimbob
After Pie
Posts: 2479
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Functioning ‘mechanical gears’ seen in nature for the first time

Post by jimbob » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:10 pm

Grumble wrote:
Sat Mar 06, 2021 7:55 pm
Woodchopper wrote:
Sat Mar 06, 2021 7:52 pm
Read all about it and watch a video here: https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/fun ... first-time
Published
12 Sep 2013
I knew I’d seen it before! Why has this one resurfaced I wonder?
It is amazingly cool though
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
Woodchopper
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3166
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: Functioning ‘mechanical gears’ seen in nature for the first time

Post by Woodchopper » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:33 pm

Grumble wrote:
Sat Mar 06, 2021 7:55 pm
Woodchopper wrote:
Sat Mar 06, 2021 7:52 pm
Read all about it and watch a video here: https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/fun ... first-time
Published
12 Sep 2013
I knew I’d seen it before! Why has this one resurfaced I wonder?
Didn’t realise it was from seven years ago. I saw a link on Twitter, thought it was new.

Still cool though.

User avatar
Grumble
After Pie
Posts: 2009
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: Functioning ‘mechanical gears’ seen in nature for the first time

Post by Grumble » Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:53 pm

Woodchopper wrote:
Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:33 pm
Grumble wrote:
Sat Mar 06, 2021 7:55 pm
Woodchopper wrote:
Sat Mar 06, 2021 7:52 pm
Read all about it and watch a video here: https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/fun ... first-time
Published
12 Sep 2013
I knew I’d seen it before! Why has this one resurfaced I wonder?
Didn’t realise it was from seven years ago. I saw a link on Twitter, thought it was new.

Still cool though.
It is. This kind of thing happens occasionally, if you missed it first time round it’s great. It’s just a mystery as to why things suddenly become popular after years of obscurity.
You’ve got no chutzpah, your organisational skills are lacklustre and your timekeeping is abysmal.

User avatar
Gfamily
After Pie
Posts: 2483
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Functioning ‘mechanical gears’ seen in nature for the first time

Post by Gfamily » Sat Mar 06, 2021 11:02 pm

Grumble wrote:
Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:53 pm
Woodchopper wrote:
Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:33 pm
Grumble wrote:
Sat Mar 06, 2021 7:55 pm

I knew I’d seen it before! Why has this one resurfaced I wonder?
Didn’t realise it was from seven years ago. I saw a link on Twitter, thought it was new.

Still cool though.
It is. This kind of thing happens occasionally, if you missed it first time round it’s great. It’s just a mystery as to why things suddenly become popular after years of obscurity.
There are super spreaders on social media. I can tweet and get no responses, but if I reply to someone with a big following, I can get a huuuge amount of interaction.
This wasn't so much of a thing in 2014, much less earlier.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

Post Reply