Quantized Majorana conductance

Get your science fix here: research, quackery, activism and all the rest
User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 7822
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: Quantized Majorana conductance

Post by shpalman » Thu Dec 15, 2022 8:34 pm

rps20221215_212002-01.jpeg
rps20221215_212002-01.jpeg (175.5 KiB) Viewed 374 times
Spin qubits in germanium work though.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 7822
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: Quantized Majorana conductance

Post by shpalman » Thu Feb 16, 2023 4:36 pm

NISQ Is Dead, a Dying Dead End, With No Prospects for a Brighter Future or Practical Quantum Computing

You just need "near-perfect qubits" instead. Well ok then why didn't you say.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 7822
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: Quantized Majorana conductance

Post by shpalman » Fri Mar 03, 2023 11:58 am

In addition to not existing as quasiparticles in solid state systems, Majorana fermions also do not exist as fundamental particles.

"The fact that we didn't detect anything demonstrates the feasibility of spending a whole bunch more money to not detect anything on a much bigger scale" said a particle physicist, again.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

Post Reply