Page 3 of 3
Re: Vaccine has no effect on household transmission
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:54 pm
by Woodchopper
sheldrake wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 5:59 pm
Woodchopper wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 5:28 pm
I’m trying to show you what you’d need to do if you wanted your argument to be taken seriously.
Eh? post a wall of papers I hadn't even read the abstracts from?
Well exactly. If you want to claim that the CDC's literature review shows that they are lying in favour of the pharma industry you'll need to actually do a literature review yourself.
Re: Vaccine has no effect on household transmission
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2021 7:48 pm
by jimbob
lpm wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 3:01 pm
Things look like tiny incremental improvements of questionable value when it's an improvement from, say, 86% to 92% to 94%.
But when the same numbers are flipped to risk falling from 14% to 8% to 6% it looks like a very useful improvement.
Don't lose sight of what boosters will achieve with only an incremental improvement.
Indeed. It's a huge impact on hospitalisations.
Re: Vaccine has no effect on household transmission
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2021 10:41 pm
by sheldrake
Woodchopper wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:54 pm
sheldrake wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 5:59 pm
Woodchopper wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 5:28 pm
I’m trying to show you what you’d need to do if you wanted your argument to be taken seriously.
Eh? post a wall of papers I hadn't even read the abstracts from?
Well exactly. If you want to claim that the CDC's literature review shows that they are lying in favour of the pharma industry you'll need to actually do a literature review yourself.
Are you really going to make me review *every* paper? Isnt evidence of one clear twisting of a paper’s conclusion enough to doubt other claims they make sufficient that you want to check for yourself?
Re: Vaccine has no effect on household transmission
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2021 1:47 am
by jdc
ignore. I posted the wrong draft.