## Space-time

### Space-time

Did Einstein really mean that energy occupying intergalactic space and unbounded energy traversing through intergalactic space was actually indistinguishable from the space in transparent nature , rather than space and time being an interwoven ''fused'' fabric ?

Given any given coordinate point of space , (x0,y0,z0,) , that given point cannot displace , be created or destroyed .

Given the same coordinate spatial point of a Quantum field , (x0,y0,z0,) , that point can displace relative to the static point . (Proven by the Earths Magnetic poles displacement ) .

Thank you for reading .

Given any given coordinate point of space , (x0,y0,z0,) , that given point cannot displace , be created or destroyed .

Given the same coordinate spatial point of a Quantum field , (x0,y0,z0,) , that point can displace relative to the static point . (Proven by the Earths Magnetic poles displacement ) .

Thank you for reading .

### Re: Space-time

No, Einstein did not postulate that.

### Re: Space-time

Space-time is any mathematical model that fuses the 3 dimensions of space and time !

You are incorrect in saying Einstein did not propose this or there wouldn't be a model on space-time curvature . Einsteins propsed this in his attempt to explain gravity which of course is incorrect . He explained orbits , not how gravity works .

Did you even give any thought to what I wrote about indistinguishable ?

Did you actually consider what the questions asks ?

Did Einstein really mean etc ...

### Re: Space-time

I suggest you write a proper blogpost putting a coherent proposition and then see if anyone's interested rather than taking the approach you have done here.

My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct

ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn

Meta? I'd say so!

ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn

Meta? I'd say so!

### Re: Space-time

Or if you are simply picking this stuff up from some pseudo-science new physics seller on the internet, and garbling it selectively at us, perhaps you can just provide a link to the source. Maybe we can locate a ready-prepared complete and coherent debunking explanation that you desire.

### Re: Space-time

Doesn't space have 3 dimensions anyway? Wouldn't space-time therefore be 4 dimensions?Untangled wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 8:45 pmSpace-time is any mathematical model that fuses the 3 dimensions of space and time !

You are incorrect in saying Einstein did not propose this or there wouldn't be a model on space-time curvature . Einsteins propsed this in his attempt to explain gravity which of course is incorrect . He explained orbits , not how gravity works .

Did you even give any thought to what I wrote about indistinguishable ?

Did you actually consider what the questions asks ?

Did Einstein really mean etc ...

And if so, how does that explain the 5D movie I saw in the summer?

### Re: Space-time

That isn't what Dyqik denied. He denied what you actually wrote the first time.Untangled wrote: ↑Tue Feb 22, 2022 8:45 pmSpace-time is any mathematical model that fuses the 3 dimensions of space and time !

You are incorrect in saying Einstein did not propose this or there wouldn't be a model on space-time curvature . Einsteins propsed this in his attempt to explain gravity which of course is incorrect . He explained orbits , not how gravity works .

These are well-known rhetorical methods.

On another forum, I once wrote a catalogue and typology of debate methods used by creationists, pseudo-scientists, fake-news peddlars, conspiracy theorists, etc. The fact that you are using their methods doesn't mean you are one, of course, that would be a logical fallacy.

### Re: Space-time

That makes sense.

But just to be sure, perhaps Untangled might want to give us a diagram. I find things are easier to understand with a diagram