The importance of references in scientific papers

Get your science fix here: research, quackery, activism and all the rest
Post Reply
User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 5602
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

The importance of references in scientific papers

Post by Gfamily » Sat Nov 09, 2024 7:16 pm

Screenshot_2024-11-09-19-14-29-51_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg
Screenshot_2024-11-09-19-14-29-51_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg (366.56 KiB) Viewed 1476 times
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 9924043957
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

Chris Preston
Snowbonk
Posts: 582
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:05 am

Re: The importance of references in scientific papers

Post by Chris Preston » Mon Nov 11, 2024 5:14 am

Not hard to guess who the reviewer was.

This is seriously poor behaviour on the part of the reviewer and the editor should have called it out.
Here grows much rhubarb.

Allo V Psycho
Catbabel
Posts: 780
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2019 8:18 am

Re: The importance of references in scientific papers

Post by Allo V Psycho » Mon Nov 11, 2024 12:42 pm

I recently sent a paper to a journal I wasn't familiar with but a colleague had mentioned it to me. I cited 8 references - it's a niche field. The editor responded that they would only send it for refereeing if I made the total number of references up to 20 (but with no suggestion that they cited a particular person). I have no idea what benefit it was to the journal to have 20 references. I withdrew the paper anyway.

User avatar
wilsontown
Clardic Fug
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:51 am

Re: The importance of references in scientific papers

Post by wilsontown » Tue Nov 19, 2024 10:55 am

Yep, editor should really be stepping in there.
"All models are wrong but some are useful" - George Box

Post Reply