Retracting a retraction?

Get your science fix here: research, quackery, activism and all the rest
Post Reply
Posts: 638
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm

Retracting a retraction?

Post by FlammableFlower » Thu Jan 09, 2020 1:11 pm

Actually the answer is no, but it does provide an interesting discussion on retractions: ... etraction/

User avatar
Posts: 749
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm

Re: Retracting a retraction?

Post by sTeamTraen » Thu Jan 09, 2020 2:01 pm

One of my claims to nerd fame is that it was my investigations that led to an article being retracted twice from the same journal, which I believe may be a unique historical event.
Careering along in my creosote car

Chris Preston
Sindis Poop
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:05 am

Re: Retracting a retraction?

Post by Chris Preston » Tue Jan 14, 2020 12:33 pm

On a technicality, Wakefield's paper had two retractions. A retraction of the interpretation of the paper by 10 of the authors, followed some years later by a retraction of the rest of the paper.
Here grows much rhubarb.

User avatar
Posts: 1424
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Retracting a retraction?

Post by jimbob » Sat Feb 01, 2020 11:45 pm

Almost the opposite - but a very weird rebuttal letter for calls to retract 26 papers here: ... -englisch/

Some of the work claimed that people with a "cancer-prone personality" were 121 times more likely to die of cancer than those without it, so a rather implausible biological effect - given the general cancer rate in the population.

ETA: ... 5318822045
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

Post Reply