Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Get your science fix here: research, quackery, activism and all the rest
Post Reply
User avatar
Brightonian
Dorkwood
Posts: 1429
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:16 pm
Location: Usually UK, often France and Ireland

Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by Brightonian » Sat Feb 15, 2020 1:56 pm

I always thought it was. Wikipedia seems to agree with me:
Wikipedia wrote:the rowlock acts as a fulcrum
But from the letters page in today's Guardian, a third of the way down:
Somebody named David Jackson in Cheshire wrote:Quick crossword No 15,527 (G2, 12 February) perpetuates a common misconception: the rowlock is not the fulcrum; it’s the load (it’s the boat that is moved). The fulcrum is the water.

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8242
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by shpalman » Sat Feb 15, 2020 2:08 pm

I think the Guardian letter writer is right and wiki has used fulcrum in the sense that the oar pivots around that point in terms of the frame of reference of the boat at least, but that's not the right sense for understanding why the boat moves.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 5180
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by Gfamily » Sat Feb 15, 2020 2:56 pm

Half the time it's a fulcrum, half the time it's the load.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

User avatar
Boustrophedon
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2860
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
Location: Lincolnshire Wolds

Re: Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by Boustrophedon » Sat Feb 15, 2020 4:05 pm

I have always found the classification of levers into the different orders to be utterly pointless; It does not aid understanding and gives no new insight into the things and dates from a time when science was in the "stamp collecting" phase. It's a beam with three point loads, end of.

Is the boat the load or is the water? It's all relative.

Short version: Who gives a feck?
Hjulet snurrar men hamstern är död.

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5276
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by jimbob » Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:01 pm

Don, your ideas intrigue me - may I subscribe to your newsletter?
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
Boustrophedon
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2860
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
Location: Lincolnshire Wolds

Re: Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by Boustrophedon » Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:59 pm

jimbob wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:01 pm
Don, your ideas intrigue me - may I subscribe to your newsletter?
There is only one edition per however long it takes, hand carved into buckboards and bound in chains.
Hjulet snurrar men hamstern är död.

User avatar
basementer
Dorkwood
Posts: 1504
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm
Location: 8024, Aotearoa
Contact:

Re: Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by basementer » Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:59 pm

Gfamily wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2020 2:56 pm
Half the time it's a fulcrum, half the time it's the load.
Exactly. While the blade is in the water and the rower is pulling, it's the load; when the rower lifts the blade out of the water to come forward, it becomes a fulcrum.
Money is just a substitute for luck anyway. - Tom Siddell

plodder
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:50 pm

Re: Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by plodder » Sun Feb 16, 2020 4:57 am

Boustrophedon wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2020 4:05 pm
It's a beam with three point loads, end of.
Nice. Also illustrates the difference between civil and mechanical engineering (the other difference being if it moves/is stuck it’s mended/broken)

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5276
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by jimbob » Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:34 pm

plodder wrote:
Sun Feb 16, 2020 4:57 am
Boustrophedon wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2020 4:05 pm
It's a beam with three point loads, end of.
Nice. Also illustrates the difference between civil and mechanical engineering (the other difference being if it moves/is stuck it’s mended/broken)
ImageIconic Architecture, Tower Bridge, London, England. by David Millican (Photoshop free zone), on Flickr
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
sTeamTraen
After Pie
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Re: Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by sTeamTraen » Wed Feb 19, 2020 12:52 am

Boustrophedon wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2020 4:05 pm
I have always found the classification of levers into the different orders to be utterly pointless; It does not aid understanding and gives no new insight into the things and dates from a time when science was in the "stamp collecting" phase. It's a beam with three point loads, end of.
So the whole discussion is a load of rowlocks?
Something something hammer something something nail

User avatar
Martin_B
After Pie
Posts: 1614
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:20 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Re: Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by Martin_B » Wed Feb 19, 2020 3:59 am

sTeamTraen wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2020 12:52 am
Boustrophedon wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2020 4:05 pm
I have always found the classification of levers into the different orders to be utterly pointless; It does not aid understanding and gives no new insight into the things and dates from a time when science was in the "stamp collecting" phase. It's a beam with three point loads, end of.
So the whole discussion is a load of rowlocks?
Possibly a load of sloblocks
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"

User avatar
Boustrophedon
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2860
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
Location: Lincolnshire Wolds

Re: Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by Boustrophedon » Wed Feb 19, 2020 11:30 pm

In my little corner of the Meccanosphere the rowlock is obviously the fulcrum because it is the obvious pivot.

But consider the jemmy, it has the applied force at one end and two close together points of contact; one right at the end, the other an inch in. You use it to lever open a gap; which is the fulcrum and which is the load, does it matter? No. Do I care over muchly? No.

Stanley Fubar, the best named tool ever and a type of jemmy.
Image
Hjulet snurrar men hamstern är död.

User avatar
Martin_B
After Pie
Posts: 1614
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:20 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Re: Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by Martin_B » Wed Feb 19, 2020 11:57 pm

Boustrophedon wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2020 11:30 pm
In my little corner of the Meccanosphere the rowlock is obviously the fulcrum because it is the obvious pivot.
It all depends on what your frame of reference is, I suppose.

If your frame of reference is just the boat, the rowlock is the fulcrum.
If your frame of reference is the boat and the river then the rowlock is the fulcrum for moving the oar once it leaves the water. But when in the water the fulcrum is the blades of the oar, which are also the point of load.
If your frame of reference is the boat, river and immediate environs, then as the blades put a load on the water, the water moves backwards, and the pivot is some distance up the blade; the skill of the oarsman is to try and keep the pivot as close to the blades as you can.
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"

plodder
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:50 pm

Re: Is a rowlock a fulcrum?

Post by plodder » Thu Feb 20, 2020 6:35 pm

This stuff matters if you want someone to design a tool or device, therefore it matters.

Post Reply