Exactly 1000 years of Europeans in North America
Exactly 1000 years of Europeans in North America
New dendrochronology dating of L'Anse aux Meadows has given a date for occupation of 1021 AD.
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/vik ... wfoundland
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/vik ... wfoundland
Re: Exactly 1000 years of Europeans in North America
The exactly is doing a fair bit of work there.
Still cool though.
Still cool though.
Re: Exactly 1000 years of Europeans in North America
The paper is open access, by the way: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03972-8
Re: Exactly 1000 years of Europeans in North America
Not that much. Depending on what the wood was.
If it was a structural beam etc, it means that one building was made in 1021
Definitely cool, thanks
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
Re: Exactly 1000 years of Europeans in North America
The dating is basically ±1.5 years. The site is believed to only have been occupied for a "short" period, probably less than a decade.
Re: Exactly 1000 years of Europeans in North America
They have very precisely dated a few bits of wood to 1000 years ago in an interesting way, which is the cool bit, and it's fun that it's a nice round number. But that doesn't tell you when they arrived*, just when they did some work. All you know is an "at least" (with an error range) which doesn't fit into my definition of exactly.
*Which is the impression I got from the thread title, and what my comment was based on.
Re: Exactly 1000 years of Europeans in North America
Yeah, I know it's mainly numerology that it's interesting that it's 1000 years. But it's maybe a little more likely that it's from the first half of the <decade of occupation.monkey wrote: ↑Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:50 pmThey have very precisely dated a few bits of wood to 1000 years ago in an interesting way, which is the cool bit, and it's fun that it's a nice round number. But that doesn't tell you when they arrived*, just when they did some work. All you know is an "at least" (with an error range) which doesn't fit into my definition of exactly.
*Which is the impression I got from the thread title, and what my comment was based on.
I guess it's accurate to within a presidential term.
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Exactly 1000 years of Europeans in North America
That is very cool, thanks!
ETA I know in Iceland the Vikings made extensive use of driftwood, which complicates dating a bit, but I guess Newfoundland was better forested
ETA I know in Iceland the Vikings made extensive use of driftwood, which complicates dating a bit, but I guess Newfoundland was better forested
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Exactly 1000 years of Europeans in North America
That's the argument used in the paper! Along with the waney edge being present and not showing signs of immersion.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Thu Oct 21, 2021 6:05 pmThat is very cool, thanks!
ETA I know in Iceland the Vikings made extensive use of driftwood, which complicates dating a bit, but I guess Newfoundland was better forested
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Exactly 1000 years of Europeans in North America
sh.t, totally busted commenting without reading the full paper
It sounds fascinating - will have a proper look after dinner.
It sounds fascinating - will have a proper look after dinner.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.