2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Post Reply
User avatar
Opti
Dorkwood
Posts: 1473
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 11:21 pm
Location: On the beach

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Opti » Mon Dec 20, 2021 10:18 pm

If it was a work meeting, who's taking the minutes? Where are the laptops? Where are the tablets? Where are the files?
Do we now have government by chat?
With Yoko just sitting in?

Just Asking Questions.
Time for a big fat one.

plebian

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by plebian » Mon Dec 20, 2021 11:45 pm

Iirc Blair was a fan of "sofa governing" having informal chats to make decisions. Not to excuse the bastards one iota, but the informal meetings side is at least arguable.

purplehaze
Fuzzable
Posts: 286
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2019 12:27 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by purplehaze » Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:49 am

plebian wrote:
Mon Dec 20, 2021 11:45 pm
Iirc Blair was a fan of "sofa governing" having informal chats to make decisions. Not to excuse the bastards one iota, but the informal meetings side is at least arguable.

Did Cherie Blair attend the meetings with her baby?

Did Carrie Symonds have security clearance to attend this meeting?

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Princess POW
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Bird on a Fire » Tue Dec 21, 2021 10:10 am

During the lockdown last summer we were running some long term field research project, often requiring a small team of us to meet in a swamp from about 5am to lunchtime.

We'd sometimes hang around afterwards to eat a packed lunch, perhaps including a cold beer.

It was probably technically against the rules, but also zero additional risk and added a semblance of normality to our lives at a stressful time when we had been locked down for months.

Obviously we're not the government, so optics weren't really a consideration. But if they were all working hard together (not the Johnsons, but the rest of them) anyway a catered chat in the garden after work seems harmless pandemic-wise and helpful mental health-wise.

I think the reason to hammer the government about this is because they clearly didn't afford the same consideration to workers more generally.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.

User avatar
El Pollo Diablo
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
Location: FBPE

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by El Pollo Diablo » Tue Dec 21, 2021 12:31 pm

I think several reasons tbh.

Firstly, the amount of people who were fined or harassed by police at that stage of the pandemic for similar behaviour was pretty large.

Secondly, if you're in government, it's your job to demonstrate the proper application of the rules you created. Not to do so is the height of hypocrisy.

Thirdly, they have not once, not since this whole party sh.t started, actually admitted fault. Johnson has claimed that the video of Stratton laughing about the party that happened made him, like, super duper angry, but insists that no party took place. Raab has claimed that this garden event was both a business meeting and a post-business drinks. If they just fronted up and stopped f.cking lying, this might have blown over by now. It's the denial of obvious reality that grates the most.
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued

WFJ
Catbabel
Posts: 648
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2021 7:54 am

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by WFJ » Tue Dec 21, 2021 1:04 pm

How similar are the situations where others have been prosecuted? Are there any cases where nurses/doctors/shop staff or other key workers who had been in close contact throughout they day stayed for drinks after work and were prosecuted? If so, the garden photo is clearly indefensible. In any case the presence of Carrie in the photos is difficult to defend.

At much as I am enjoying the kicking Boris and the Tories are getting over this, and it is a perfect example of the constantly dripping damage of them not owning up and apologising, its is only really the parties that stick out as totally indefensible. This photo and the quiz much more so.

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by lpm » Tue Dec 21, 2021 1:07 pm

Plus it's an all sides thing.

The you-lock-down-far-too-late-every-f.cking-time-you-tw.t crowd hate these parties for being so cavalier.

The you-take-away-our-freedumbs-you-c.nt-it's-just-the-flu crowd hate these parties for being so hypocritical.

I'm assuming it's the freedumb morons who are leaking all this.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by lpm » Tue Dec 21, 2021 2:02 pm

Digging into ancient history from the long forgotten year of 2020...

The Number 10 garden party was on 15 May. On 16 April the police had new guidelines. They were to "stop people 'home-working' in parks or sitting on a public bench for long periods of time."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-52312560

It was a couple of months after the police had flown their drone in the Peak District searching for walkers miles from anywhere. And a few weeks after the "you can't buy Easter Eggs" thing.

At exactly the time they were cracking open another bottle BoaF posted on the Covid thread:
OTOH my mum lives alone, and runs sheltered housing for old folks. She's taking it very seriously, and hasn't seen friends or family since Portugal started lockdown two months ago (as she recognised the uselessness of the UK government's guidance, and that of the "social" housing corporation she works for). She's definitely finding it incredibly hard. I'd happily fly over there just to give her a hug but really don't want to risk spreading the virus and rendering the whole thing moot - most of the nursing homes (not quite the same thing I know) in my hometown are already post-apocalyptic wastelands and I'd rather not be responsible for my mum's gaff becoming the next one. International travel, especially to places like the UK and USA, just seems like a totally irresponsible risk in 99% of cases.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by lpm » Tue Dec 21, 2021 2:08 pm

Lol, via Suw, someone stopped by the police around that time for looking at a swan.

https://twitter.com/WhistlingDixie4/sta ... 6577947657
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

tom p
After Pie
Posts: 1876
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:14 pm
Location: the low countries

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by tom p » Tue Dec 21, 2021 3:09 pm

lpm wrote:
Tue Dec 21, 2021 2:08 pm
Lol, via Suw, someone stopped by the police around that time for looking at a swan.

https://twitter.com/WhistlingDixie4/sta ... 6577947657
I saw a comment btl on a guardian article about this. it was from an intensive care doctor who hadn't seen her kids for days. Her hubby brought the kids to the park to meet her in her lunch hour. they were threatened by a pig.

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Princess POW
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Bird on a Fire » Tue Dec 21, 2021 3:23 pm

I'd forgotten the UK went the whole hog on sending the pigs to harass people. Such a weird place.

May 2020 feels so long ago I'd forgotten where we all were on the covid timeline, so thanks for the reminder lpm.

And yeah, the gov's pathetic attempts to Big Lie / doublespeak their way out of it doesn't help. Nothing new there of course, but it's interesting that some people are finally noticing that these c.nts are indeed c.nts now that they've been inconvenienced too.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.

User avatar
Stephanie
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2896
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:38 pm
Location: clinging tenaciously to your buttocks

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Stephanie » Tue Dec 21, 2021 4:00 pm

This thread may be interesting to review viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1073
"I got a flu virus named after me 'cause I kissed a bat on a dare."

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4746
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Grumble » Tue Dec 21, 2021 4:09 pm

Stephanie wrote:
Tue Dec 21, 2021 4:00 pm
This thread may be interesting to review viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1073
Very much in my mind. Luckily my parents never did get harassed by over-zealous cops.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8241
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by shpalman » Mon Jan 10, 2022 10:42 pm

“Hi all, after what has been an incredibly busy period we thought it would be nice to make the most of the lovely weather and have some socially distanced drinks in the No 10 garden this evening. Please join us from 6pm and bring your own booze!”

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... byob-party
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

FlammableFlower
Dorkwood
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by FlammableFlower » Tue Jan 11, 2022 8:11 am

Will Johnson actually get accused of misleading parliament?

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Woodchopper » Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:00 am

FlammableFlower wrote:
Tue Jan 11, 2022 8:11 am
Will Johnson actually get accused of misleading parliament?
It wouldn't exactly be his first offence.

plodder
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:50 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by plodder » Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:13 am

Leak it on a Monday, headlines on Tuesday, PMQs and clips for the telly on Weds, opinion pieces on Thurs, fresh excuses on Friday.

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by lpm » Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:36 am

Leak it on a Monday, headlines on Tuesday, Riley Bina and DJ Chello split up on Wednesday, Riley and DJ Chello get back together on Thursday.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
El Pollo Diablo
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
Location: FBPE

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by El Pollo Diablo » Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:02 am

They chilled on Sunday.
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Princess POW
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Bird on a Fire » Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:36 am

Ruth Davidson just stuck the boot in on BBC news.

Amazing that 100 or so people have had this email for 18 months and it's only just now being leaked.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.

User avatar
headshot
Dorkwood
Posts: 1414
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 9:40 am

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by headshot » Tue Jan 11, 2022 11:31 am

Bird on a Fire wrote:
Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:36 am
Ruth Davidson just stuck the boot in on BBC news.

Amazing that 100 or so people have had this email for 18 months and it's only just now being leaked.
sh.t sticks together.

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4746
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Grumble » Tue Jan 11, 2022 11:41 am

What’s f.cking next?
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

User avatar
El Pollo Diablo
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
Location: FBPE

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by El Pollo Diablo » Tue Jan 11, 2022 12:05 pm

What I think is becoming more and more apparent to people is something I've been saying for a while - that Johnson is not a clever man. He is a stupid man.
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued

User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 5180
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by Gfamily » Tue Jan 11, 2022 12:14 pm

Bird on a Fire wrote:
Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:36 am
Ruth Davidson just stuck the boot in on BBC news.

Amazing that 100 or so people have had this email for 18 months and it's only just now being leaked.
The timings are working out quite well though - as it meant that the 'Christmas Party' could return a "I wasn't there, this was terrible, We shall investigate" response.
The 'Party on the Terrace' photo then led to a "no, no, this was just our way of working in a socially distanced manner" response

Then this. Busted

and the timing is great so that the outrage from each of the earlier incidents has allowed to subside, before coming back even stronger.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

ojno
Pop Chop
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2022 12:17 pm

Re: 2020 No. 10 Christmas Party!

Post by ojno » Tue Jan 11, 2022 12:26 pm

Bird on a Fire wrote:
Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:36 am
Amazing that 100 or so people have had this email for 18 months and it's only just now being leaked.
Gfamily wrote:
Tue Jan 11, 2022 12:14 pm
and the timing is great so that the outrage from each of the earlier incidents has allowed to subside, before coming back even stronger.
It seems clear to me that no one who was there or involved in any way actually gave a sh.t. The evidence was merely filed away for later. Just in case.

The most likely explanation for this "drip, drip" that I can see is that the "grey men in grey suits" have decided that Johnson has outlived his usefulness, and are (tacitly) encouraging these leaks to happen in order that he is forced out.

Post Reply